• Journal of Service Research and Studies
• /
• v.1 no.1
• /
• pp.91-101
• /
• 2011

A lecture evaluation is an important factor to validate student's level and improve a reformation of the college evaluation as well. Therefore, this paper researches into the lecture evaluation to apply a better objective method and a fair assessment of all lectures. These researches are analyzed by each subject, based on the lecture assessment performed in K College. First, if a student absent more than 4 weeks, they cannot be participated in the lecture evaluation. Second, the lecture evaluation date takes place when the next class registrations start. Third, the connection between the number of students and the teaching assessment should be considered. Finally, various types of the teaching assessment tools, including the lecture evaluation method such as multiple choices or writing questions need to be applied. Finally lecture evaluation results must be reflected in the next lesson.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Computer Information Conference
• /
• 2021.07a
• /
• pp.465-466
• /
• 2021

본 논문에서는 강의평가 시스템을 이용하여 주된 이용자인 학생들에게 수업에 앞서 강의에 대한 전반적인 학습 분위기와 강의를 들었던 학생들의 평점을 제안한다. 이 시스템은 강의평가를 효율적으로 보여주어 수강 신청의 접근성을 최대화하고, 각 강의의 안내와 정보를 취득하는 데 도움을 준다. 또한, 이 시스템은 네 가지의 평점을 부여하여 이를 바탕으로 종합적인 평점을 할당한다. 이때 강의평가에 대한 평가를 곁들이면서, 평점을 제시하여 강의평가를 보려는 다른 이들에게 뚜렷한 정보력과 어떤 강의가 좋은지 잘 보여준다. 본 논문에서는 동적 웹 페이지를 사용하여 가시성이 뛰어난 강의평가 시스템을 제공하는 면에서 우수함을 보인다.

• Journal of the Korea Institute of Information and Communication Engineering
• /
• v.17 no.5
• /
• pp.1233-1238
• /
• 2013

The course evaluation is used in faculty evaluation model even the grade of course evaluation has a big gap in absolute value with the characteristics of subjects. It is important to obtain the reliability of course evaluation because the result of course evaluation is fed to instructor to assure the quality of instruction. The purpose of this paper are to analyze the relation of attendance rate and course evaluation to improve the reliability of course evaluation.

• Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods
• /
• v.18 no.1
• /
• pp.35-45
• /
• 2011

Some researchers insist that many students respond to the course evaluation surveys without sincerity and even without reading the questions. To analyze the pattern of student responses, the results of course evaluations for five semesters at Jeonbuk National University are reviewed. In mandatory course evaluations, 20% of the students marked the same option numbers to all questions regarding their lectures. In addition, consistent responses were over 50%. These results show that the university administration should reform the current course evaluation system in all respects.

• Journal of Engineering Education Research
• /
• v.8 no.4
• /
• pp.52-63
• /
• 2005

National competitiveness is related directly to the strength of educational competitiveness of universities. Seoul National University (SNU) has been taking efforts to improve its competitiveness in University education in variety of ways and the classroom assessment is one key example of those. The current classroom assessment system practiced at universities is being used to evaluate courses and professors in charge by the university administration or evaluation committee. The classroom assessment system is not intended to put students and professors as the subject of the evaluation. In this case, the evaluation is intended wrongfully to rank the courses and evaluate professors' achievement by assigning grades on the lectures. Instead, a proper classroom assessment system should be targeted to improve the quality of lectures by encouraging communication among professor and students in the classroom. In this study, it was intended to investigate a suitable classroom assessment system to enhance the effectiveness of education, not to rank the courses and evaluate professors' achievement. For this purpose, research has been carried out to investigate opinions of professors at SNU on the criteria of classroom assessment and to analyze the criteria of classroom assessment at other domestic universities in Korea. The inquiries for feedback on the lecture by the student in the class was analyzed. The current classroom assessment system at SNU was reviewed and an improvement plan was devised to evaluate liberal art courses of engineering and science schools at SNU. In this research, the problems in the classroom assessment system was reviewed and improvement points were searched to utilize the classroom assessment system more effectively for the improvement of lecture quality.

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.13 no.11
• /
• pp.5033-5043
• /
• 2012

The purpose of this study is to complement the problem of lecture evaluation items and to improve the lecture evaluation items to fit to original purpose of lecture evaluation to enhance the lecture's quality. For this, meanings of good teaching, lecture evaluation domains and elements of preceding study, the contents and problems of lecture evaluation tools in A college were searched, and in this foundation, an improved lecture evaluation tool was suggested. As the result of this study, important features of the improved tool are followed: First, the compositions of evaluation domains, evaluation elements, and evaluation items were reconstituted. Second, to acquire the important information for the better lecture, the items were devised according to the features of good teaching in colleges. Third, the items concerned of evaluation elements which is commonly suggested by the lecture evaluation tools of preceding study were developed. Forth, if there is the information which is required for the enhancement of the lecture quality, the items were developed though the result could not be presented in the arithmetical means. Fifth, evaluation items to improve the problems of lecture evaluation tools which had been carried out in A college were developed.

• Journal of the Korean Data and Information Science Society
• /
• v.21 no.1
• /
• pp.87-98
• /
• 2010

This research deals the method to assess the validity and reliability of students' evaluation for lectures. Most papers for student's evaluation have focused the procedures for controlling the external effects, but this paper is trying to answer for "How reliable is the student rating?" An empirical study shows that the evaluations in Jeonju University have the fair validity and reliability. The generalizability theory is suggested to obtain the more comprehensive results rather than Cronbach's alpha to examine internal consistency.

• Journal of Digital Convergence
• /
• v.14 no.11
• /
• pp.101-106
• /
• 2016

A number of non-structured data associated with lectures in the field of university education have been generated and it is an important consideration of the students's written comments lecture evaluation. The purpose of this study is to find student interaction factors associated with the student evaluation of teaching at universities, and to provide some insights into improving the student evaluation program based on the results. So, this study consists of three steps that create interaction score, collect student's written comments satisfaction, and analyze an individual professor score. There are a number of limitations to this study. The limitation is that the study was conducted on a narrow sample of the overall student population.

• The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education
• /
• v.19 no.3
• /
• pp.55-66
• /
• 2016

This study explored the rating tendency of online university learners in their course evaluations and its effects on the course evaluation results. Data including the subjects' demographic information, learning activities, rating tendency, and course evaluation results were collected from 1,098 learners in an online university in the spring semester of 2015. There were three main findings. First, the subjects showed distinctive rating tendencies in participation rates for course evaluation and rating consistency. The participation rates went from one extreme (0%) to the other (100%), and the rating consistency among the test items was highly related to that among the courses as a whole. Second, the subjects showed different tendencies in terms of course evaluation period, rating consistency, and course evaluation results according to demographic information and learning activities. Third, course evaluation results were independently affected by demographic information, learning activities, and rating consistency. The study was meaningful in that it explored learners' rating tendencies concretely and suggested that such tendencies should be considered in analyzing course evaluation results.

• Communications of Mathematical Education
• /
• v.24 no.4
• /
• pp.909-922
• /
• 2010

This paper deals with disparities in course evaluation between general and major courses of mathematics education. We provide concrete evidences which verify the mismanagement of the evaluation system and can be an impetus to a more rational one. We indicate the direction to which professors of mathematics education should head. Also those statistics obtained from the author's teaching of mathematics education and related subjects for twelve years are provided for the fact-finding of and improving the erroneous evaluation system.