• Proceedings of the KHEEA Conference
• /
• 2002.08a
• /
• pp.5-19
• /
• 2002

재한국, 1995년제일차출대국가제정적가정과교육과정. 지후, 한국적가정과교육과정경마료7차적수정여개혁과정. 재차과정중, 가정과정불단지추극출신, 기과목명칭재변화, 필수자선 등 선과성질야재변화, 과치함축, 여기술과정합. 이차, 가정과변위남녀생공수적과목, 저취순응료사회발전적수요. 종한국적교육과정래간, 1년급도10년급시국민공용기본교육계단, 11년급도12년급시자선교육계단. 거차, 가정과교육과정적접배위여하 : 소학(5~6학년)위실과, 중학화고중(7~10학년)위"기술.가정", 고중(11~12학년)위"가전과학". 장종2003년개시실시적가정과과시안배위여하 : 소학각2과시, 7~12학년시각2.3.3.3과시, 11~12학년위6개등차. 최근, 청소년문제, 교육환경, 상시인성, 가정파양, 소비과잉, 학대아동, 등사회문제도근가정생활유착밀절적연계, 인차, 재반지교육중, 가정교육응수중시. 단시, 실제상병불시여차. 작위교육주체적교사화부모도몰유인식도저개실정. 인차, 가정학자여교사유심요주근지거연구가정교육. 우기시, 유필요근중국, 일본, 등저사아주국가호상교류화합작적과정중거탐색가정교육적안정발전. 하면파미래가정학육발전적방향건의여하 : 1) "가정" 과시이가정과위연구대상적가정학적독립적연구요영역. 가정경적연구감상시 "가정", 타이가정생활질량적제고위기연구목적. 인차, 재가정교육중, 과목적명칭명명위 "기술. 가정", "가정일반". "가사" 시부합리적. 이응위 "가정" 2) 가정교육웅사중시성각색적변환, 직업적인직변고적각도출발, 사소학도고중분개위필수화선수과, 유남녀생공수. 3) 가정과과시재축점축단. 도시유우교육과정적축단이인기적피면불료적현상. 단시고 여가정과시실천, 실험성과목응보장기최저적과시, 최기마필수유지현재적과시. 4) 향래, 한국적가정교육과정기이가정과위기본철학배경화리념, 우급시파국가교육과정적배경화이념, 가정학적발전동태반영재교육과정중, 즉강조즘요교. 단시, 경력료반복적변혁지후, 최근, 각중시즘양거배양학생적십 요 양적능력여가치. 인차, 가정교육파교육목라방재즘루거제고가정생활적질량, 즘루거호조화가정생활화직업생활, 즘양거개발합리지해결화실천가정생활적가치관. 5) 최근, 가정교육파교육방향화목라방재거배양학생작위독립적개인, 작위가족적성원, 작위사회성원래주인생도로적능력. 인차, 가정교육이인적생활위중심. 우거섭급학생재성장과정중소우도적문제,재거포괄재가정화사회생활중소우도적문제. 즉거배양해결가정생활중소우도적소유적 문종적종합능력. 6) 가정과재교학방법화교학평개상, 응채용실험, 실습, 관찰 등방식, 응반체험성, 실천성경험. 위차, 응필편기험적실험, 실습설비. 7) 확정교육과정편제적치후, 응제고일반교육학자적참여율, 가정교육학자응적극참여 제정교청정책적유관교육적각종위원회. 재제정정책적과정중각진소능, 적극제출건고성적의황. 8) 한, 중, 일 삼국권원층립가정교육과정도작사, 위삼국교육과정적량호발전주공헌.

• Korean Journal of Human Ecology
• /
• v.10 no.1
• /
• pp.1-13
• /
• 2001

본 연구는 가정과 교사교육자(전국 국 사립 대학의 가정교육과에 재직하고 있는 교수)들의 교육과정 관점을 조사함으로써 실천적 비판 중심 가정과 교육과정 개발을 위한 기초자료와 교사교육자들을 위한 세미나 프로그램 개발을 위한 유용한 자료를 제공하고자 한다. 본 연구의 결과는 다음과 같다. (1) 가정과 교사교육자들은 하나의 두드러진 교육과정 관점을 선호하지는 않았지만 인지과정중심 교육과정에 가장 높은 선호도를 보였다. (2) 석사과정에서 가정학 세부영역을 전공한 교사교육자는 가정교육학을 전공한 교사교육자보다 학문중심 교육과정과 기술중심 교육과정을 가정과 교육을 위한 적절한 관점으로 인식하였다. (3) 박사과정에서 가정교육학을 전공한 교사교육자는 가정학 세부영역을 전공한 교사교육자보다 개인중심교육과정을 가정과 교육을 위한 적절한 관점으로 인식하였다. (4) 가정교육학 관련 교과목을 가르치는 교사교육자는 가정학 세부영역 관련 교과목을 가르치는 교사교육자보다 기술중심 교육과정을 가정과 교육을 위한 적절한 관점으로 인식하였다.

• Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association
• /
• v.32 no.2
• /
• pp.19-42
• /
• 2020

The purposes of this study were to analyze the home economics(hereafter HE) curriculum in Victoria State, Australia, and to derive the implications for the HE curriculum in Korea. To accomplish the purposes, the contents of the curriculum were analyzed through the relevant web pages, and the actual conditions of the HE curriculum implementation were identified through e-mail and interviews with HE teachers and administrator. The results of this study were as follows. First, the HE curriculum for F-10 was one of the cross-curriculum resources based on the content descriptions and achievement standards of 'Design and Technologies' and 'Health and Physical Education' curriculum. Because the HE curriculum is competency-based curriculum and did not stipulate what was to be taught then, HE teachers had lots of autonomy in organizing and operating the curriculum, which led to the need for professionalism. Second, VCE subjects, both 'Food Studies' and 'Health and Human Development', which are HE elective curriculum for 11th and 12th graders, require students to take written tests produced by the VCAA. Because there are no specific details to be taught in the curriculum, the HE teacher had the need to devise and operate various classes to foster problem-solving skills, critical thinking skills, etc. Third, HE teachers had the discretion to create all the subject names, contents to deal with, and evaluations to prepare for the school curriculum, and thus were exerting their professionalism. This was due to the fact that the system was well equipped and VCE subjects were audited, even though teachers' performances were related to their individual competencies.

• Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association
• /
• v.29 no.3
• /
• pp.49-75
• /
• 2017

The purpose of this study is to provide the justification of the subject through review and alternatives example on the internal consistency of Home Economics curriculum components focused to the clothing & textiles area based on the beliefs and values inherent in the Home Economics curriculum. For this purpose, we examined the perspective of the assumptions about the five components of the curriculum - family, society, objective, subject matter, method in education - from the revised curriculum in 2007 to in 2015, and suggests an example of subject matter based on the result. The results of this study are summarized as follows. First, the clothing & textiles area of the revised curriculum from in 2007 to in 2015, family, society, objective, subject matter and method in education, excluding subject matter, were taken from a critical science perspective. In order for Home Economics curriculum components to be internally consistent, assumptions about the subject matter should be transformed to deal with the clothing & textiles as a family work. And needed to complement assumptions about family, objective and method in education. Second, based on the discussion, suggested an alternative example to the clothing & textiles area based on the internal consistency of Home Economics curriculum components.

• Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association
• /
• v.36 no.2
• /
• pp.33-50
• /
• 2024

This study examined the trends in home economics education research across different curriculum periods and journals. A total of 374 papers related to the 2009, 2015, and 2022 revised curricula were selected and analyzed using network analysis from four journals. First, research trends were analyzed by curriculum period. Keyword frequency analysis revealed that articles on the 2009 and 2015 revised curricula primarily focused on analyzing the curriculum to develop textbooks or programs. In contrast, papers on the 2022 revised curriculum explored broader directions. Topic modeling results highlighted the prominent topics for each period: 'environmental education' in the 2009 revised curriculum, 'safety and health education' in the 2015 revised curriculum, and 'ecological transition' in the 2022 revised curriculum. Second, research trends were analyzed by journal. Keyword frequency analysis by journal exposed specific research tendencies. For example, in the Journal of Home Economics Research, 'perceptions of practical classes' and 'analysis of safety textbooks' were major topics for the 2009 revised curriculum, while 'teaching and learning plans for competence development' dominated research on the 2015 revised curriculum. This study demonstrates that the concepts and goals emphasized in curriculum revisions are reflected in the corresponding research.

• Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association
• /
• v.35 no.4
• /
• pp.61-79
• /
• 2023

This study was approached as a method of reflective observation to build practical knowledge about home economics by reevaluating the experience of participating in the national development of the 2022 revised home economics curriculum through self-questioning, review, and reflection. The results are as follows: First, "all learners will still live in an unpredictable future society and choose the best actions to better themselves, their surroundings, and the world." Second, the value of home and education in the overall curriculum structure is "home economics education are life lessons that help future generations develop the competence necessary to lead a better life." Third, "in order to ensure the sustainability of all humanity and the world in the future society, the area of intentional learning that helps young people choose and lead better lives should be the core, and home economics education should focus on 'Good life Literacy'.

• Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association
• /
• v.4 no.1
• /
• pp.97-99
• /
• 1992

• Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association
• /
• v.22 no.2
• /
• pp.81-99
• /
• 2010

This study was motivated by the fact that the educational curriculum needs revising as the contemporary society undergoes dramatic changes; this change demonstrates that Korea society now turns into a multicultural community. In this vein, this study aims to examine how the national Home economics curriculum (revised in 2007) incorporated the essence of multicultural education program and that of international understanding program into the coursebook, and to suggest which part of the coursebook needs revising to enhance its validity. To attain this goal, this research was conducted to analyze how two programs are implemented in secondary school, and to propose how those programs should be developed to address the immediate needs of the current society. To illustrate, this study examines a variety of theories and methodology on how multicultural education program should be implemented along with the current situation of Korea society. In addition, quantitative research was conducted to acquire empirical data from 6 coursebooks the frequencies of statements and visual aids that are considered to be directly reflect the essence of two programs. The results demonstrate that two programs are relegated into a lesser position compared to other programs; furthermore, they lack materials to deepen students' understanding about multicultural society and international relations. Therefore, the considerable revision needs to be conducted to embrace the essence of multicultural society and international understanding programs, and sensitize students to the immediate needs of the current society.

• Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association
• /
• v.35 no.4
• /
• pp.81-98
• /
• 2023

The purpose of this study is to develop the global citizenship education program content system in the context of the 2022 revised home economics curriculum, recognizing the need for global citizenship education. The study is grounded in practical problem-based program. In the analysis stage, the educational trend requiring global citizenship education in the national curriculum was elucidated by analyzing the 2022 revised curriculum documents and future education documents related to global citizenship education. A framework for global citizenship education goals within home economics curriculum was designed. Accordingly, the educational goal of this curriculum, "Cultivation of family competencies linked to global citizenship competencies," was established by posing the perennial question, "As a global citizen, what actions should I take for sustainable choices related to the living environment?" In the design stage, four key ideas in the "Living Environment and Sustainable Choices" domain of the 2022 revised home economics curriculum for elementary school were analyzed to derive practical problems. In the development stage, content elements were derived based on four criteria. This study is significant in analyzing the need for global citizenship education within home economics context by analyzing documents related to global citizenship competencies for the future and examining the 2022 revised curriculum's general framework and home economics education curriculum.

• Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association
• /
• v.35 no.3
• /
• pp.151-167
• /
• 2023

The advent of the carbon neutrality era has led to a paradigm shift in education toward ecological transition education. It is time to understand the concept and practice of ecological transition education pursued in the 2022 revised curriculum and prepare for changes to the main life education covered in home economics education. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to explore the role of home economics education for carbon neutrality for future generations who will have to live in the era of rapidly changing climate crisis, and to propose a practice plan for ecological transition education in the main living area based on the educational contents of the 2022 revised curriculum. To achieve these objectives, this study reviewed previous research on carbon neutrality and ecological transition education, analyzed the curriculum for main life from the first curriculum to the 2022 revised curriculum, and proposed the direction of main life education for ecological transition education. Through this study, the importance of carbon neutrality and ecological transition can be emphasized in home economics education, and it is expected that it can be used as a basis for realizing ecological transition education in actual education sites.