• Journal of Korean Electronics
• /
• v.18 no.6
• /
• pp.14-19
• /
• 1998

• Communications of the Korean Institute of Information Scientists and Engineers
• /
• v.19 no.3
• /
• pp.6-13
• /
• 2001

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Broadcast Engineers Conference
• /
• 1999.06b
• /
• pp.407-450
• /
• 1999

• Communications of the Korean Institute of Information Scientists and Engineers
• /
• v.24 no.1 s.200
• /
• pp.19-26
• /
• 2006

• Communications of the Korean Institute of Information Scientists and Engineers
• /
• v.16 no.2
• /
• pp.12-16
• /
• 1998

• Journal of the korean veterinary medical association
• /
• v.46 no.9
• /
• pp.801-804
• /
• 2010

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Broadcast Engineers Conference
• /
• 2001.11a
• /
• pp.421-445
• /
• 2001

• Magazine of korean Tunnelling and Underground Space Association
• /
• v.25 no.3
• /
• pp.98-99
• /
• 2023

• Korean Architects
• /
• s.666
• /
• pp.42-45
• /
• 2024

• MALSORI
• /
• no.43
• /
• pp.11-23
• /
• 2002

In this paper, speech style is divided into two - read speech and dialogue. In the experiment, read speech and dialogue use the same sentence to control discrepancy from different sentence. While the number of AP in read speech is less than in dialogue, the number of IP in read speech is more than in dialogue. The number of syllables which consist of AP is more various in dialogue. Intonational patterns of the first AP in IP make a difference. In dialogue, there is a pattern which has many high tones - LHH. The FO range in dialogue is wider than in read speech.