• 국제학술발표논문집
• /
• The 9th International Conference on Construction Engineering and Project Management
• /
• pp.25-32
• /
• 2022

As a project delivery method, Design-Build (DB) has provided owner, architect, and contractor groups with a process of early design and rapid construction for the past three decades. Although there are many benefits to using standard DB, dissatisfaction has arisen due to limitations to innovate, limited owner involvement during design, and often lengthy procurement. Progressive Design-Build (PDB) has become an appealing alternative providing benefits not seen with standard DB. This paper investigates how PDB impacts a project and how it compares against standard DB; it also presents a proposed framework for evaluating the owner's responsibility and assessment of a project, which we named the "Four Pillars of Project Success". The four pillars are defined with respect to an owner's responsibility and assessment of a project, including project predictability, project risk, project schedule, and project cost. We conducted a literature review, examined several public project case studies, analyzed PDB project information collected by the Design-Build Institute of America (DBIA), and held stakeholder interviews with owners, contractors, and architects who have used both PDB and standard DB. This paper offers insight into PDB's structure and outcomes so an owner group can make an informed decision when considering PDB as their next construction contracting method.

• 국제학술발표논문집
• /
• The 5th International Conference on Construction Engineering and Project Management
• /
• pp.332-337
• /
• 2013

Various project delivery methods have been utilized by owners over the years to maximize project performance. The design-build delivery method is being increasingly used due to the advantages it can offer to an engineering construction industry. Numerous studies have advocated the use of design/build over the traditional design/bid/build delivery approach. This study represents comprehensive analysis of 40 projects from the construction industry and shows that design/build method may not provide all the benefits to project performance. This study found timesaving was a definitive advantage of design/build project delivery, but the positive effects of cost changes was not convincing. Based on the results of the study, the project management expertise and experience of the contractor may have a greater impact on project performance outcomes than focusing on project delivery strategy only.

• 국제학술발표논문집
• /
• The 9th International Conference on Construction Engineering and Project Management
• /
• pp.669-677
• /
• 2022

In this paper, different types of traditional project delivery methods in the construction industry were explored and a comparative analysis against Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) were performed. The advantages of IPD method for all parties, owner/engineer/architect/general contractor, were explored by reviewing the most recent literature. The literature suggests that IPD method should be the dominating project delivery method and diluting the conventional methods such as Design-Bid-Build due to more collaborative and mutually beneficial ways of doing construction; IPD is newer and a more comprehensive method to capture the intrinsic values of project collaboration. This paper presents a comparison of the commonly used methods of project delivery, Design-bid-build, CMAR, & Design-Build and addresses their advantages and disadvantages in differing project scopes and sizes. Several industry leaders with experience in the four types of project delivery addressed were surveyed. The survey results show an overwhelming desire for future projects to go toward IPD from the contractor/owner/RDP. The biggest obstacle facing a project from using IPD appears to be trust.

• 한국건축시공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건축시공학회 2011년도 춘계 학술논문 발표대회 1부
• /
• pp.207-209
• /
• 2011

Numerous reports show that alternative project delivery systems (PDSs) such as design-build (DB), construction management at risk (CMR), and design-build-maintain (DBM) are increasingly used in many countries. This study compared characteristics of each PDS (design-bid-build (DBB), DB, CMR, or DBM) by analyzing quantitative data from 9 research articles. In order to compare characteristics between DBB and alternative PDSs, the study is based on principal 3 factors - Time, Cost, and Quality. DB shows the best performance in the time part and also the cost performance depending on facility type and project size. The performance of quality has minor difference among different PDSs. These results support the fact that using an appropriate PDS by the characteristic of a project makes high value of efficiency and productivity.

• 한국건설관리학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건설관리학회 2004년도 제5회 정기학술발표대회 논문집
• /
• pp.242-245
• /
• 2004

공공 건설사업 발주 정책의 변화 및 대형화, 복잡화되고 있는 건축 프로젝트의 특성에 따라 향후 건설시장은 디자인 빌드 방식의 건설사업이 더욱 증가할 것으로 예상된다. 그러나 디자인 빌드의 증가와 더불어 운영관리 측면에서의 문제점이 나타나고 있다. 디자인 빌드 방식은 일괄사업자가 설계와 시공에 대한 책임을 전담하게 되므로 많은 리스크 요인이 존재하며, 기본설계에서 실시설계를 거쳐 시공단계에 이르는 업무 프로세스가 명확히 규명되어 있지 않아 사업의 진행에 따른 사업 수행자의 일관되고 체계적인 관리가 어려운 실정이다. 이에 본 연구에서는 디자인 빌드 프로젝트의 효과적인 수행을 위한 프로세스 모델을 개발하고, 관련지식의 체계적인 축적 및 활용을 위한 데이터베이스의 구축방안을 제시하고자 한다.

• 한국건설관리학회논문집
• /
• 제6권1호
• /
• pp.109-116
• /
• 2005

공공 건설사업 발주 정책의 변화 및 대형화, 복잡화되고 있는 건축 프로젝트의 특성에 따라 향후 건설시장은 디자인 빌드 방식의 건설사업이 더욱 증가할 것으로 예상된다. 그러나 디자인 빌드의 증가와 더불어 운영관리 측면에서의 적지 않은 문제점이 나타나고 있다. 디자인 빌드 방식은 일괄사업자가 설계와 시공에 대한 책임을 전담하게 되므로 많은 리스크 요인이 존재하며, 기본설계에서 실시설계를 거쳐 시공단계에 이르는 업무 프로세스가 명확히 규명되어 있지 않아 사업의 진행에 따른 사업수행자의 일관되고 체계적인 관리가 어려운 실정이다. 이에 본 연구에서는 디자인 빌드 프로젝트의 효과적인 수행 및 관리를 지원하기 위한 프로세스 모델을 개발하고, 관련지식의 체계적인 축적 및 활용을 위해 디자인 빌드 프로젝트의 데이터베이스 구축 및 활용 방안을 제시하고자 한다.

• Journal of Construction Engineering and Project Management
• /
• 제6권2호
• /
• pp.16-23
• /
• 2016

The use of inappropriate procurement methods to deliver construction projects has long been acknowledged as a major source of poor project performance and is particularly problematic for the Libyan Construction Industry. Poor procurement method selection has been recognised as a major contributory factor to frequent time and cost overruns. This paper offers a way of selecting specific procurement methods to maximize successful project performance. The methodology involves an intensive review of relevant literature, followed by a semi-structured questionnaire survey. The key findings of the study reveal that 11 out of its 12 common selection criteria exhibit a significant contribution to one or more project performance criteria (time, cost and quality). Project clients should therefore prioritise these criteria when selecting a design-bid-build method. Knowledge of the criteria that contribute positively to project performance will also enable clients to work out, prior to and during construction, the best measures and provisions for successful project outcomes.

• 국제학술발표논문집
• /
• The 1th International Conference on Construction Engineering and Project Management
• /
• pp.974-979
• /
• 2005

Effective communication flow is a fundamental for the success of any construction projects. The key role of communications among project parties is even more critical in the case of Design-Build (DB) projects. Previous research has shown that these projects have an environment where integration between different project team members and schedule constraints increase channels of communication, and require faster communication flows. This paper summarizes the findings from research analyzing organizational structures and communication flow of the Texas State Highway 130 (SH130) project. Awarded in 2002, the SH130 project, totaling $1.3 billion USD, constitutes the "pilot" application for the DB approach in the state of Texas. A set of observations pertaining to team organization and communication issues in the design-build environment is included.

• 한국건설관리학회논문집
• /
• 제6권4호
• /
• pp.91-100
• /
• 2005

건설 전체 프로세스를 하나의 주체가 단일 책임하에 수행하는 일괄입찰방식은 설계와 시공의 연계로 인한 기술력확보, 공기단축, 사업비절감, 품질확보 등의 예상효과로 인해 적용이 확대되리라 예상되는 발주방식의 하나이다. 한편, 국내 일괄입찰방식의 낙찰자 결정방법은 일괄입찰방식으로 수행되는 모든 프로젝트에 동일한 배점기준을 적용하도록 되어 있어, 일괄사업자 선정시 발주자의 목적과 프로젝트의 특성을 반영하기 어려운 것이 현실이다. 이에 본 연구에서는 일괄사업자 선정에 있어서 발주자의 목적과 프로젝트의 특성을 반영할 수 있는 일괄입찰방식의 적격심사 분야별 배점 결정모델을 제안함으로써, 발주자가 당해 프로젝트에 최적인 일괄사업자를 합리적으로 선정하는 것을 돕고자 하였다.

• 한국건축시공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건축시공학회 2011년도 추계 학술논문 발표대회
• /
• pp.95-97
• /
• 2011

The purpose of this study is to suggest the development direction and performance analysis of design review system in design-build project. As a result of surveys, the fairness and transparency of design review system was abruptly increased. But local government has not fairness and transparency. Therefore this research has proposed the integration management and joint application of design review organization in design-build project. So, we expect that the transparency is raised in management of design review committee.