• Title/Summary/Keyword: $BMD^(R)$

Search Result 92, Processing Time 0.015 seconds

Cross-calibration of Bone Mineral Density between Two Different Dual X-ray Absorptiometry Systems: Hologic QDR 4500-A and Lunar EXPERT-XL (서로 다른 이중에너지 방사선흡수기계 기종(Hologic QDR 4500-A와 Lunar EXPERT-XL) 간의 골밀도 교차 보정)

  • Jo, Jin-Man;Kim, Jae-Seung;Kim, Ghi-Su;Kim, Sang-Wook;Shin, Jung-Woo;Moon, Dae-Hyuk;Lee, Hee-Kyung
    • The Korean Journal of Nuclear Medicine
    • /
    • v.33 no.3
    • /
    • pp.282-288
    • /
    • 1999
  • Purpose: A cross-calibration equation is needed to compare bone mineral density measured by different dual X-ray absoptiometry systems. We performed this study to establish appropriate cross-calibration equations between two different dual X-ray absorptiometry systems. Materials and Methods: Bone mineral density of anterior-posterior lumbar spine (L2-4 level) and femoral neck were measured in 109 women ($55{\pm}11yr$) using two different dual X-ray absorptiometry systems (Lunar EXPERT-XL and Hologic QDR 4500-A). Bone mineral density values measured by two systems, including area, bone mass content, bone mineral density and percentile of young normals were compared and cross-calibration equations between two systems derived. Results: The bone mineral density values of 109 women measured by Lunar system were $0.958{\pm}0.17g/cm^2$ at L2-4 and $0.768{\pm}0.131g/cm^2$ at femur neck, which were significantly higher ($13{\pm}6%$ at L2-4 and $19{\pm}7%$ at femur neck, p<0.001) than those ($0.851{\pm}0.144 g/cm^2$ at L2-4 and $0.649{\pm}0.108 g/cm^2$ at femur neck) by Hologic system. Bone mineral content and percentile of young normals measured by Lunar system were also significantly higher than those by Hologic system (p<0.001), whereas there was no difference in area (p>0.05). There was a high correlation between bone mineral density values of L2-4 and femoral neck obtained with both dual X-ray absortiometry systems (r=0.96 and 0.95, respectively). Cross-calibration equations relating the bone mineral density were Lunar= 1.1287${\times}$Hologic -0.0027 for L2-4 and Lunar= 1.1556${\times}$Hologic+0.0182 for femoral neck. Conclusion: We obtained cross-calibration equations of bone mineral density between Lunar EXPERT-XL and Hologic QDR 4500-A. These equations can be useful in comparing bone mineral density obtained by different dual X-ray absorptiometry systems.

  • PDF

Relationship between Intake of Milk and Milk Products and Bone Health by Sex and Age-Group in Koreans - Using Data from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2008~2011 (성별, 연령별에 따른 우유·유제품 섭취와 골 건강과의 관련성 - 2008~2011 국민건강영양조사 자료를 이용하여)

  • Baek, Sang Woo;Lee, Heon Ok;Kim, Hyun Ja;Won, Eun Sook;Ha, Young Sik;Shin, Yong Kook;Om, Ae Son
    • Journal of the Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition
    • /
    • v.46 no.4
    • /
    • pp.513-522
    • /
    • 2017
  • This study was conducted to examine the relationships between milk and milk product intake and bone health. The data from the 2008~2011 Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) were used for data analysis. Subjects included 4,626 men and 6,144 women aged 19 to 64 years. Daily intake frequency of milk and milk products was obtained using a food frequency questionnaire and divided into two categories: less than one serving per day and more than one serving per day. Bone mineral density (BMD) values of total femur, femoral neck, and lumbar spine were compared based on daily intake frequency, and relationships between milk and milk product daily intake frequency and osteoporosis risk were evaluated based on logistic regression. In men aged 30~39, BMDs of total femur and femoral neck were significantly higher in the group that consumed milk more than one serving per day (P<0.05). Intake frequency of milk and milk products was also significantly related to both BMDs of total femur and femoral neck. The odds ratio (OR) for milk intake frequency (more than one serving per day) compared to intake frequency less than one serving per day was 0.36 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.21~0.62], and the OR for milk and milk products intake frequency (more than one serving per day) was 0.49 (95% CI 0.28~0.86) in women aged 50~64. These results indicate that increased consumption of milk and its products is associated with reduced risk of bone health disease, and adequate intakes of milk and milk products might play an important role in maintaining optimum bone health. Further research on the causal relationship and dose-response association between milk intake and bone heath using prospective cohort data is required prior to applying the observed results to programs that prevent bone health problems.