• Title/Summary/Keyword: $2^n-1$ Times Of Unit Matrix Operations

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.016 seconds

A New Function Embedding Method for the Multiple-Controlled Unitary Gate based on Literal Switch (리터럴 스위치에 의한 다중제어 유니터리 게이트의 새로운 함수 임베딩 방법)

  • Park, Dong-Young
    • The Journal of the Korea institute of electronic communication sciences
    • /
    • v.12 no.1
    • /
    • pp.101-108
    • /
    • 2017
  • As the quantum gate matrix is a $r^{n+1}{\times}r^{n+1}$ dimension when the radix is r, the number of control state vectors is n, and the number of target state vectors is one, the matrix dimension with increasing n is exponentially increasing. If the number of control state vectors is $2^n$, then the number of $2^n-1$ unit matrix operations preserves the output from the input, and only one can be performed the unitary operation to the target state vector. Therefore, this paper proposes a new method of function embedding that can replace $2^n-1$ times of unit matrix operations with deterministic contribution to matrix dimension by arithmetic power switch of the unitary gate. The proposed function embedding method uses a binary literal switch with a multivalued threshold, so that a general purpose hybrid MCU gate can be realized in a $r{\times}r$ unitary matrix.

Implementation and Performance Evaluation of the Faddev-Leverrier Algorithm using GPGPU (GPGPU를 이용한 파데브-레브리어 알고리즘 구현 및 성능 분석)

  • Park, Yong-Hun;Kim, Cheol-Hong;Kim, Jong-Myon
    • IEMEK Journal of Embedded Systems and Applications
    • /
    • v.8 no.3
    • /
    • pp.171-178
    • /
    • 2013
  • In this paper, we implement the Faddev-Leverier algorithm using GPGPU (General-Purpose Graphics Processing Unit) to accelerate singular value decomposition. In addition, we compare the performance of the algorithm using CPU and CPU plus GPGPU for eleven ${\times}n$ matrix sizes in order to decompose singular values, where =4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, 512, 1,024, 2,048, and 4,096. Experimental results indicate that CPU achieves better performance than CPU plus GPGPU for $n{\leq}64$ because of a large number of read and write operations between CPU and GPGPU. However, CPU plus GPGPU outperforms CPU exponentially in the execution time for $n{\geq}64$.