The standard deviation and standard score shown in the results of various tests are the most common way to interpret test results. In existing research, the main focus has been on surveying students' satisfaction with CBT(computer-based tests), and little research has been done on the discrimination power and distribution of CBT. This study is about the impact of CBT on standard deviation and normal distribution. CBT is highly efficient in terms of manpower, time, and cost, particularly in printing, grading, and result analysis, compared to PBT(paper-based tests), and the result analysis is processed through a program, so test takers can know the results immediately. In most tests, the larger the standard deviation, the higher the discriminatory power, and the more normal the distribution, the better the questions are. The average score of the CBT takers was 12.190 points, the standard deviation was 4.903, and the variance was 24.038, and the average score according to the test method was approximately 3.293 points higher for CBT takers. The fact that CBT scores were high indicates that, in terms of the population, students are in an environment where monitors are more familiar than paper. As a result of normal distribution analysis, it was found that CBT was theoretically and statistically unbiased, appropriate, reliable, and statistically significant.