Purpose: This study examined how technology, industry, and policy keywords have been discussed and structurally co-occurred in Korean medical device research over the past three decades, providing an empirical basis for health technology assessment (HTA) policy and industrial strategy. Methods: A cross-sectional bibliometric analysis was performed on 447 papers from the Korea Research Information Service (RISS), with 1994-2024 as the main analytical period (final search: July 15, 2025; 24 partial-year 2025 papers included with caution). Four complementary text mining techniques were applied-TF-IDF, network and CONCOR cluster analysis, LDA topic modeling, and Sentence-BERT (SBERT) semantic similarity analysis. Results: TF-IDF revealed a differentiated discourse: 'surgery' (174.61) and 'robot' (151.45) formed specialized domains, whereas 'insurance' showed high frequency but low TF-IDF, functioning as a broad cross-cutting element. CONCOR yielded seven clusters, the largest (G.7, 26 keywords) bringing technology, industry, and policy/regulatory terms into a single cluster. LDA identified four optimal topics with K=4 selected based on the maximum Coherence Score (0.3356); one topic was insurance-centered (19.2%), while the remaining three (combined 80.7%) addressed digital technology, convergence-device industrialization, and tele-medicine/AI services. SBERT showed that device-related terms were semantically proximate to both innovation/ therapeutic terms (medical_device ↔ innovative_medical_device: 0.87; medical_device ↔ therapeutic_medical_device: 0.87) and legal/regulatory terms (medical_industry ↔ medical_law: 0.88), indicating semantic adjacency among device, innovation, and regulatory dimensions. Conclusion: All four methods consistently showed structural co-occurrence of technology, industry, and policy in Korean medical device discourse. These results offer an empirical basis for HTA policy design and industrial strategy.