DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Coupled effects of corrosion and fault-crossing ground motions on continuous rigid frame bridges: Nonlinear dynamic response and failure mechanisms

  • Hongyu Jia (State Key Laboratory of Bridge Intelligent and Green Construction, Southwest Jiaotong University) ;
  • Jiahao Hou (School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University) ;
  • Hao Bai (Sichuan Expressway Construction & Development Group Co., Ltd.) ;
  • Zhi Xu (Shudao Investment Group Co., Ltd.) ;
  • Kang Jia (Sichuan Chengdu Construction Engineering Group Co., Ltd.) ;
  • Shixiong Zheng (State Key Laboratory of Bridge Intelligent and Green Construction, Southwest Jiaotong University)
  • Received : 2026.02.04
  • Accepted : 2026.05.01
  • Published : 2026.06.10

Abstract

Bridges traversing active faults in aggressive environments (such as coastal or reservoir regions) face the coupled risks of chloride-induced corrosion and fault-crossing seismic excitations. The failure mechanisms governing continuous rigid frame bridges (CRFBs) under such coupled degradation-seismic conditions remain poorly understood. This study develops an integrated analytical framework comprising: (i) time-dependent deterioration models accounting for chloride-induced reinforcement section loss, yield-strength reduction, and concrete cover softening; and (ii) a refined 3D nonlinear finite element model (FEM) incorporating fiber beam-column elements, a soil-structure interaction system (SSIS), bearings, and pounding effects. (iii) Synthetic fault-crossing ground motions are generated by superimposing low-frequency fling-step pulses onto spectrum-matched high-frequency records. These synthetic motions are then applied to the bridge model via multi-support excitation. Comparative analyses demonstrate that fault-crossing motions shift the structural response from an inertia-dominated amplification mode to a quasi-static forced displacement mode. This mode shift imposes significantly larger and more asymmetric kinematic demands compared to standard near-fault scenarios. Structural responses exhibit a nonlinear dependence on permanent ground rupture displacement (PGRD), typically plateauing at an observed peak of 0. 6 m for the examined cases. This phenomenon is attributed to a force-limiting mechanism: the yielding of foundation soil and the premature plastic hinging of corroded piers restrict the inertial force transmission to the superstructure. Furthermore, the fault-crossing angle (FCA) governs the demand distribution, exhibiting an 'M-shaped' sensitivity; deviation from orthogonality amplifies pier-base curvature by up to three orders of magnitude due to longitudinal locking effects. A frequency-decoupling mechanism is also identified: low-frequency pulses dictate global pier drifts and permanent bearing offsets, whereas high-frequency components control local cyclic damage. Crucially, corrosion accelerates pier yielding and exacerbates the accumulation of plastic damage, thereby substantially amplifying the collapse probability under the extreme forced displacements induced by fault rupture.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

The research for this paper was supported partially by Sichuan Science and Technology Program (No. 2026YFHZ0008), National Science Foundation of China (No. 52178169, No. U21A20154, and No. 2021YFB1600300) and the Scientific Research and Development Project of China Railway Group Limited (2022-Special-01). The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to all the sponsors for the financial support.

References

  1. Tong, L., Wang, D., Zou, Y., Shi, F., Sun, Z. (2024). Seismic performance and damage control of large-span prestressed concrete rigid-frame bridges with high piers crossing strike-slip faults. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 177, 108412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2023.108412.
  2. Jia, H., Cheng, W., Kang, W., Zhai, Y., Zheng, S., Hui, Y. (2024). BPNN-predicted fault permanent dislocation and seismic response analyses of long-span suspension bridges crossing dip-slip faults. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 182, 108712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2024.108712.
  3. Yang, S., Mavroeidis, G.P. (2018). Bridges crossing fault rupture zones: A review. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 113, 545-571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.03.027.
  4. Yang, S., Mavroeidis, G.P., Ucak, A. (2020). Analysis of bridge structures crossing strike-slip fault rupture zones: A simple method for generating across-fault seismic ground motions. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 49, 1281-1307. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3290.
  5. Garini, E., Gazetas, G., Anastasopoulos, I. (2017). Evidence of significant forward rupture directivity aggravated by soil response in an Mw6 earthquake and the effects on monuments. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 46, 2103-2120. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2895.
  6. Fadaee, M., Hashemi, K., Farzaneganpour, F., Anastasopoulos, I., Gazetas, G. (2020). 3-storey building subjected to reverse faulting: Analysis and experiments. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 138, 106297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106297.
  7. Gao, Q.H., Monti, G., Chang, Z.W., Wang, R., Li, Z. (2025). A novel approach for classifying acceleration-pulses and non-acceleration-pulses without any filtering techniques. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 29(11), 2262-2279. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2025.2505440.
  8. Liu, Z. (2025). Near-fault ground motion identification method based on local mean decomposition. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 29(11), 2303-2360. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2025.2505976.
  9. Goel, R.K., Qu, B., Tures, J., Rodriguez, O. (2014). Validation of fault rupture-response spectrum analysis method for curved bridges crossing strike-slip fault rupture zones. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 19(5), 06014002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000602.
  10. Yang, S., Mavroeidis, G.P., Tsopelas, P. (2022). Validation of the fault rupture-response spectrum analysis method for ordinary and seismically isolated bridges crossing strike-slip fault rupture zones. Engineering Structures, 273, 115026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115026.
  11. Jia, H., Wu, W., Xu, L., Zhou, Y., Zheng, S., Zhao, C. (2024). Numerical simulation and damaged analysis of a simply-supported beam bridge crossing potential active fault. Engineering Structures, 301, 117283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.117283.
  12. Zhang, F., Li, S., Wang, J., Zhang, J. (2020). Effects of fault rupture on seismic responses of fault crossing simply-supported highway bridges. Engineering Structures, 206, 110104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.110104.
  13. Park, S.W., Ghasemi, H., Shen, J., Somerville, P.G., Yen, W.P., Yashinsky, M. (2004). Simulation of the seismic performance of the Bolu Viaduct subjected to near-fault ground motions. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 33, 1249-1270. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.395.
  14. Dey, A., Sil, A. (2021). Advanced corrosion-rate model for comprehensive seismic fragility assessment of chloride affected RC bridges located in the coastal region of India. Structures, 34, 947-963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. istruc.2021.08.045.
  15. Afsar Dizaj, E., Salami, M.R., Kashani, M.M. (2023). Seismic vulnerability analysis of irregular multi-span concrete bridges with different corrosion damage scenarios. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 165, 107678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107678.
  16. Ma, H., Yang, Y., He, Z., Zhang, Y., Ji, F. (2019). Experimental study on mechanical properties of steel under extreme cyclic loading considering pitting damage. Ocean Engineering, 186, 106091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. oceaneng.2019.05.073.
  17. Xie, H., Yu, N., Qin, M., Zhang, Q., Kang, Y. (2025). Coupled evolution analysis of pitting behavior and corrosion-induced stress of X80 steel in the marine environment. Ocean Engineering, 334, 121547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2025.121547.
  18. Wei, Y., Jiang, C., Zeng, F., Guo, S., Zhang, Y., Cheng, B. (2025). Time-variant non-probabilistic ellipsoidal reliability analysis of offshore monopiles under lateral loads considering non-uniform corrosion effects. Ocean Engineering, 341, 122617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2025.122617.
  19. Su, J., Li, J., Wu, D., Lu, G., Wang, L., Ma, J., Li, Z.X. (2025). Lifetime seismic damage evolution and resilience assessment of offshore bridges under height-varying corrosion and scour. Ocean Engineering, 326, 120883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2025.120883.
  20. Lin, Y., Zong, Z.H., Tian, S.Z., Lin, J. (2018). A new baseline correction method for near-fault strong motion records based on the target final displacement. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 114, 27-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. soildyn.2018.06.036.
  21. Lin, Y., Zong, Z., Lin, J., Li, Y., Chen, Y. (2021). Across-fault ground motions and their effects on some bridges in the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake. Advances in Bridge Engineering, 2, 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43251-020-00028-1.
  22. Hu, S., Wang, Z.Y., Guo, Y., Xiao, G. (2021). Life-cycle seismic fragility assessment of existing RC bridges subject to chloride-induced corrosion in marine environment. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2021, 9640521. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9640521.
  23. Zeng, C., Jiang, H., Bai, X.Y., Song, G.S. (2023). Study on the multi-criteria seismic mitigation optimization of a single pylon cable-stayed bridge across strike-slip fault rupture zones. Engineering Structures, 275, 115228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115228.
  24. Jia, H., Chen, S., Guo, D., Zheng, S., Zhao, C. (2024). Track-bridge deformation relation and interaction of long-span railway suspension bridges subject to strike-slip faulting. Engineering Structures, 300, 117216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.117216.
  25. Herrera, D., Tolentino, D. (2023). Fragility assessment of RC bridges exposed to seismic loads and corrosion over time. Materials, 16(3), 1100. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16031100.
  26. Ni Choine, M., Kashani, M.M., Lowes, L.N. (2016). Nonlinear dynamic analysis and seismic fragility assessment of a corrosion damaged integral bridge. International Journal of Structural Integrity, 7(2), 227-239. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSI-09-2014-0045.
  27. Cui, F., Zhang, H., Ghosn, M., Xu, Y. (2018). Seismic fragility analysis of deteriorating RC bridge substructures subject to marine chloride-induced corrosion. Engineering Structures, 155, 61-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.10.067.
  28. Xu, J.G., Cai, Z.K., Feng, D.C. (2021). Life-cycle seismic performance assessment of aging RC bridges considering multi-failure modes of bridge columns. Engineering Structures, 244, 112818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112818.
  29. Li, C., Hao, H., Li, H., Bi, K. (2016). Seismic fragility analysis of reinforced concrete bridges with chloride induced corrosion subjected to spatially varying ground motions. International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics, 16(5), 1550010. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219455415500108.
  30. De Domenico, D., Messina, D., Recupero, A. (2023). Seismic vulnerability assessment of reinforced concrete bridge piers with corroded bars. Structural Concrete, 24(1), 56-83. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.202200378.
  31. Zaghian, S., Martín-Perez, B., Almansour, H. (2023). Finite element modelling of bridge piers subjected to eccentric load combined with reinforcement corrosion. Engineering Structures, 283, 115822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.115822.
  32. Wang, H., Li, A. (2023). Effects of mixed corrosion damage on constitutive relation and ductile fracture behavior of butt-welded joints under cyclic loading. Structures, 55, 2341-2357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2023.07.028.
  33. Du, Y.G., Clark, L.A., Chan, A.H.C. (2005). Residual capacity of corroded reinforcing bars. Magazine of Concrete Research, 57(3), 135-147. https://doi.org/10.1680/macr.2005.57.3.135.
  34. Kashani, M.M., Crewe, A.J., Alexander, N.A. (2017). Structural capacity assessment of corroded RC bridge piers. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Bridge Engineering, 170(1), 28-41. https://doi.org/10.1680/jbren.15.00023.
  35. Lin, M., Dai, F., Li, J. (2017). Nonlinear stress-strain behavior of corrosion-damaged reinforcing bars including inelastic buckling. Advanced Engineering Research, 136, 288-291. https://doi.org/10.2991/icadme-17.2017.56.
  36. Zhang, Q., Kang, X.Q., Zhu, J.C., Hu, D.K., Zhao, H.T., Gong, J.X. (2025). Study on hysteretic model of flexure-shear critical reinforced concrete columns including the non-linear degradation effects of cyclic loading. Structures, 73, 108350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2025.108350.
  37. Zhang, Q., Guo, X., Zhao, H., Hu, D., Gu, X., Li, R. (2025). A probabilistic stress-strain relationship model for steel bars including the non-uniform corrosion effects in chloride environments. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 22, e04262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2025.e04262.
  38. Zhang, Q., Zheng, N.H., Gu, X.L., Wei, Z.Y., Zhang, Z. (2022). Study of the confinement performance and stress-strain response of RC columns with corroded stirrups. Engineering Structures, 266, 114476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114476.
  39. Li, H., Yu, Z., Mao, J., Jiang, L. (2020). Nonlinear random seismic analysis of 3D high-speed railway track-bridge system based on Opensees. Structures, 24, 87-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.01.003.
  40. Jia, H.Y., Lan, X.L., Zheng, S.X., Li, L.P., Liu, C.Q. (2019). Assessment on required separation length between adjacent bridge segments to avoid pounding. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 120, 398-407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.01.031.
  41. Jia, H., Liu, Z., Xu, L., Bai, H., Bi, K., Zhang, C., Zheng, S. (2023). Dynamic response analyses of long-span cable-stayed bridges subjected to pulse-type ground motions. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 164, 107591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107591.
  42. Mander, J.B., Priestley, M.J.N., Park, R. (1988). Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete. Journal of Structural Engineering, 114(8), 1804-1826. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804).
  43. Muthukumar, S., DesRoches, R. (2006). A hertz contact model with non-linear damping for pounding simulation. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 35, 811-828. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.557.
  44. Li, S., Zhang, F., Wang, J.Q., Alam, M.S., Zhang, J. (2017). Seismic responses of super-span cable-stayed bridges induced by ground motions in different sites relative to fault rupture considering soil-structure interaction. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 101, 295-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.07.016.
  45. Tong, L., Wang, R., Wang, D. (2021). Seismic cracking mechanism and control for pre-stressed concrete box girders of continuous rigid-frame bridges: Miaoziping bridge in Wenchuan earthquake as an example. Advances in Bridge Engineering, 2, 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43251-021-00040-z.
  46. Tong, L., Wang, D., Sun, Z., Chen, L., Shi, F. (2023). Seismic uplift effect at end spans of long-span rigid-frame bridges subjected to near-fault and far-fault ground motions. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 28(7), 05023001. https://doi.org/10.1061/JBENF2.BEENG-6023.
  47. Liu, C., Fang, D. (2021). Separation of long-period components of ground motion and its impact on seismic response of long-period diagrid structures. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 150, 106942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106942.
  48. Abrahamson, N.A. (2002). Velocity pulses in near-fault ground motions. Proceedings of the UC Berkeley-CUREE Symposium in Honor of Ray Clough and Joseph Penzien, Berkeley, CA, USA.
  49. Makris, N., Chang, S.P. (2000). Effect of viscous, viscoplastic and friction damping on the response of seismic isolated structures. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 29(1), 85-107. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(200001)29:1<85::AID-EQE902>3.0.CO;2-N.
  50. Mavroeidis, G.P., Papageorgiou, A.S. (2003). A mathematical representation of near-fault ground motions. Bulletin of The Seismological Society of America, 93(3), 1099-1131. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120020100.
  51. Burks, L.S., Baker, J.W. (2016). A predictive model for fling-step in near-fault ground motions based on recordings and simulations. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 80, 119-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.10.010.
  52. Xu, C., Xiang, N.L., Li, J.Z., Guan, Z.G. (2022). Influence of near-fault pulse-like motion characteristics on seismic performance of tall pier bridges with fragility analysis. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 26(4), 2001-2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2020.1751345.
  53. Zhong, J., Wei, Y.Y., Shao, Y.H., Yang, T., Liu, X.X. (2024). An efficient method for predicting the residual displacement of UBPRC columns under near-fault ground motions. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 28(5), 1451-1473. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2023.2234500.
  54. Xu, S., Liu, J., Yin, X., Xu, Q. (2025). Seismic performance analysis of concrete dams considering the coupled effects of wavelet asymmetry and incident direction under near-fault ground motions. Engineering Structures, 327, 119670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.119670.
  55. Bi, K., Hao, H. (2011). Influence of irregular topography and random soil properties on coherency loss of spatial seismic ground motions. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 40(9), 1045-1061. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1077.
  56. Konakli, K., Der Kiureghian, A. (2012). Simulation of spatially varying ground motions including incoherence, wave-passage and differential site-response effects. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 41(3), 495-513. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1141.