한국운동역학회지 (Korean Journal of Applied Biomechanics)

  • 제35권3호
  • /
  • Pages.175-183
  • /
  • 2025
  • /
  • 1226-2226(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2093-9752(eISSN)
한국운동역학회 (Korean Society of Applied Biomechanics)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

시지각 능력이 퍼팅 얼라인먼트에 미치는 영향

Capability of Visual Perception Affecting Putting Alignment

  • Jae-Hu Jung (Department of Physical Education, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Woen-Sik Chae (Department of Physical Education, Kyungpook National University)
  • 투고 : 2025.07.09
  • 심사 : 2025.07.25
  • 발행 : 2025.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objective: The purpose of this research was to analyze the effect of providing an aiming line according to visual perception capabilities on putting alignment during golf putting address position. Method: In the current study, healthy 70 males were recruited with no golf experience and musculoskeletal disorders. To assess visual perception capabilities, vernier acuity, and pseudoneglect test was performed. Based on the tests, total 44 participants were distinguished into four groups: (1) vernier acuity high + pseudoneglect high (VHPH, n = 11), (2) Vernier acuity high + pseudoneglect low (VHPL, n = 11), (3) vernier acuity low + pseudoneglect high (VLPH, n = 11), and (4) vernier acuity low + pseudoneglect low (VLPL, n = 11). In this study, four different aiming lines were provided: (1) without an aiming line (WO), (2) with one aiming line (W1), (3) with three aiming lines (W3), and (4) with a vertical aiming line (WV) during the putting address task. Participants performed 3 trials of putting address task for each different aiming line condition. Kinematic data were used to analyze the alignment angles between the target line and the putter face, and the alignment angles between the target line and the stances. We used IBM SPSS program to conduct statistical analyses. Two-way mixed ANOVA (4 × 4, Group × Condition) was performed to examine the difference between the four groups and the four aiming line conditions based on visual perception capabilities. Bonferroni's pair-wise comparisons were conducted for the post hoc analysis on interaction effect and all statistical significance levels were set as .05. Results: The study results showed that VHPH group had significantly reduced alignment angles as compared with VLPH and VLPL groups, and VHPL group had significantly reduced alignment angles in comparison to VLPL group for both WO and W1 conditions. For the W3 condition, the VHPH group had significantly reduced alignment angles as compared with VLPL group. Additionally, W1 condition showed lower alignment angles than WV condition within VHPH group. Conclusion: In conclusion, individuals with high visual perception capabilities had superior alignment performance regardless of the aiming line conditions. For those with low visual perception capabilities, providing aiming lines enhanced putting alignment performance. Taken together, our findings provide quantitative data on the effectiveness of visual aids in improving putting alignment and in developing visual aids based on visual perception capabilities.

키워드

과제정보

This work was supported by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2021S1A5A2A01073562).

참고문헌

  1. Abdel-Aziz, Y. & Karara, H. M. (1971). Direct linear transformation from comparator coordinates in object-space coordinates in object-space coordinates in close range photogrammetry. Proceedings of the ASP Symposium of Close-Range Photogrammetry. Urbana, IL.
  2. Alexander, D. L. & Kern, W. (2005). Drive for show and putt for dough?: an analysis of the earnings of PGA Tour golfers. Journal of Sports Economics, 6(1), 46-60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527002503260797
  3. Beslow, S. & Evans, F. (2011). Truth In Numbers. Using the most recent PGA Tour stats and data gathered at the world's largest amateur tournament, SIGOLF+ shatters three putting myths. Sports Illustrated Vault, 114.
  4. Bowers, D. & Heilman, K. M. (1980). Pseudoneglect: effects of hemispace on a tactile line bisection task. Neuropsychologia, 18(4-5), 491-498. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(80)90151-7
  5. Dewhurst, P. (2015). The science of the perfect swing. Oxford University Press.
  6. Farnsworth, C. L. (1997). See it & sink it: mastering putting through peak visual performance. Harper Collins Publishers.
  7. Farnsworth, C. L. (2009). The putting prescription: the putt doctor's proven method for a better stroke. Wiley.
  8. Har, D. H. & Cho, D. H. (2015). The kinematic analysis of change of putter head on putting accuracy. Korean Journal of Physical Education, 54(6), 617-624.
  9. Johnston, A., Benton, C. P. & Nishida, S. Y. (2003). Golfers may have to overcome a persistent visuospatial illusion. Perception, 32(9), 1151-1154. https://doi.org/10.1068/p5056
  10. Karlsen, J., Smith, G. & Nilsson, J. (2008). The stroke has only a minor influence on direction consistency in golf putting among elite players. Journal of Sports Sciences, 26(3), 243-250. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410701530902
  11. Kim, J. H., Lim, K. H. & Kim, Y. T. (2020). A novel method for hyperacuity measurement. Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society, 61(2), 175-182. https://doi.org/10.3341/jkos.2020.61.2.175
  12. Kim, Y. J., Jin, Y. G., Koo, B. Y., Jang, J. U. & Mah, K. C. (2020). The effects on the putting alignment with golf balls and putters aiming lines. The Korean Journal of Vision Science, 22(4), 515-527. https://doi.org/10.17337/JMBI.2020.22.4.515
  13. Leadbetter, D. & Simmons, R. (2002). David leadbetter 100% golf: unlocking your true golf potential. Harper Resource.
  14. Lee, M. Y. & Lee, H. J. (2019). Analysis of inclination of amateur golfer putting stroke face angle and club path. Korean Journal of Sport Science, 28(2), 1121-1127.
  15. Mangum, G. (2008). Optimal putting: brain science, instincts, and the four skills of putting. Axess Book Printing.
  16. McCourt, M. E., Garlinghouse, M. & Reuter-Lorenz, P. A. (2005). Unilateral visual cueing and asymmetric line geometry share a common attentional origin in the modulation of pseudoneglect. Cortex, 41(4), 499-511. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70190-4
  17. Park, J. (2001). A kinematic analysis for putter's in putting stroke. Korean Journal of Sport Biomechanics, 11(2), 319-331, 2001.
  18. Pelz, D. (2000). Dave Pelz's putting bible: the complete guide to mastering the green (Vol. 2). Doubleday.
  19. Pelz, D. & Frank, J. A. (2000). Dave Pelz's putting bible. Doublday.
  20. Roberts, R. & Turnbull, O. H. (2010). Putts that get missed on the right: investigating lateralized attentional biases and the nature of putting errors in golf. Journal of Sports Sciences, 28(4), 369-374. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410903536467
  21. Shim, J., Miller, G. & Lutz, R. (2012). Use of ball line as an alignment aid in putting. International Journal of Golf Science, 1(2), 71-80. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijgs.1.2.71
  22. Son, Y., Na, D. L., Kwon, H. M., Kang, Y., Adair, J. C. & Heilman, K. M. (2001). Line quadrisection errors in normal subjects. Cortex, 37(5), 665-670. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70612-9
  23. Stenner, B. & Buckley, J. (2014). Use of a ball alignment mark improves putting performance in golf. International Journal of Golf Science, 3(2), 145-150. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijgs.2014-0020
  24. Sung, K. R. (1997). Measurement of vernier acuity using computer programs. Master's thesis, Ulsan University.
  25. van Lier, W. H., van der Kamp, J. & Savelsbergh, G. J. (2011). Perception and action in golf putting: skill differences reflect calibration. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 33(3), 349-369. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.33.3.349
  26. Williams, A. M., Janelle, C. M. & Davids, K. (2004). Constraints on the search for visual information in sport. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 2(3), 301-318. https://doi.org/10.1080/1612197X.2004.9671747
  27. Wiren, G. (1992). Golf: building a solid game. Prentice-Hall.