DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Primary endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy for biliary drainage prior to pancreatoduodenectomy: a retrospective study in Japan

  • Nozomi Okuno (Department of Gastroenterology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital) ;
  • Kazuo Hara (Department of Gastroenterology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital) ;
  • Seiji Natsume (Department of Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital) ;
  • Masataka Okuno (Department of Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital) ;
  • Shin Haba (Department of Gastroenterology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital) ;
  • Tomonari Asano (Department of Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital) ;
  • Takamichi Kuwahara (Department of Gastroenterology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital) ;
  • Hiroki Koda (Department of Gastroenterology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital) ;
  • Yasuhiro Shimizu (Department of Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital)
  • 투고 : 2024.08.18
  • 심사 : 2024.09.16
  • 발행 : 2025.07.30

초록

Background/Aims: Malignant lesions of the pancreatic head can cause obstructive jaundice requiring biliary drainage. However, the effect of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis and metal stents on surgical resection remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of primary endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) performed prior to pancreatoduodenectomy, excluding patients with biliary duct cancer. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy at our institution between January 2019 and December 2022. The patients were divided into three groups: without biliary drainage (n=130), endoscopic biliary stenting (EBS) (n=57), and primary EUS-HGS (n=20). Results: The positivity rate of the intraoperative bile juice culture was significantly higher in the EBS group (p<0.001). No significant difference was observed among the groups in terms of postoperative adverse events (Clavien-Dindo grade 3 or higher, p=0.784) or the positive rate of peritoneal lavage cytology (p=0.984). Seven patients in the EBS group (12.3%) experienced early adverse events related to biliary drainage (post-ERCP pancreatitis, n=3; acute cholecystitis, n=3; bile duct perforation, n=1), whereas none in the EUS-HGS group experienced adverse events. Conclusions: Primary EUS-HGS is technically feasible as a preoperative procedure and has no short-term postoperative disadvantages.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. van der Gaag NA, Rauws EA, van Eijck CH, et al. Preoperative biliary drainage for cancer of the head of the pancreas. N Engl J Med 2010;362:129–137. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0903230
  2. Gao Z, Wang J, Shen S, et al. The impact of preoperative biliary drainage on postoperative outcomes in patients with malignant obstructive jaundice: a retrospective analysis of 290 consecutive cases at a single medical center. World J Surg Oncol 2022;20:7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-021-02476-z
  3. Matsumoto K, Noma H, Fujita K, et al. Prognostic factors for severe-to-fatal post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: a multicenter prospective cohort study. J Clin Med 2024;13:1135. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13041135
  4. Park DH, Jang JW, Lee SS, et al. EUS-guided biliary drainage with transluminal stenting after failed ERCP: predictors of adverse events and long-term results. Gastrointest Endosc 2011;74:1276–1284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2011.07.054
  5. Okuno N, Hara K, Mizuno N, et al. Efficacy of the 6-mm fully covered self-expandable metal stent during endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy as a primary biliary drainage for the cases estimated difficult endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a prospective clinical study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018;33:1413–1421. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.14112
  6. Isayama H, Nakai Y, Itoi T, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for safe performance of endoscopic ultrasound/ultrasonography-guided biliary drainage: 2018. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2019;26:249–269. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.631
  7. Paik WH, Park DH. Outcomes and limitations: EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy. Endosc Ultrasound 2019;8:S44–S49. https://doi.org/10.4103/eus.eus_51_19
  8. Okuno N, Hara K, Mizuno N, et al. B2 puncture with forward-viewing EUS simplifies EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy (with video). Endosc Ultrasound 2022;11:319–324. https://doi.org/10.4103/EUS-D-21-00154
  9. Ishikawa S, Hara K, Okuno N, et al. Safety and efficacy of novel oblique-viewing scope for B2-endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy. Clin Endosc 2024;57:527–533. https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2023.129
  10. Okuno N, Hara K, Mizuno N, et al. Risks of transesophageal endoscopic ultrasonography-guided biliary drainage. Gastrointest Interv 2017;6:82–84. https://doi.org/10.18528/gii170008
  11. Okuno N, Hara K, Mizuno N, et al. Stent migration into the peritoneal cavity following endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy. Endoscopy 2015;47 Suppl 1 UCTN:E311. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1392314
  12. Fujisawa T, Isayama H, Ishii S. "ClipFlap" anchoring method for endoscopic ultrasonography-guided hepaticogastrostomy with a covered self-expandable metallic stent. Dig Endosc 2020;32:628. https://doi.org/10.1111/den.13621
  13. Cotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L, et al. A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc 2010;71:446–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2009.10.027
  14. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240:205–213. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae
  15. Isayama H, Hamada T, Yasuda I, et al. TOKYO criteria 2014 for transpapillary biliary stenting. Dig Endosc 2015;27:259–264. https://doi.org/10.1111/den.12379
  16. Artifon EL, Aparicio D, Paione JB, et al. Biliary drainage in patients with unresectable, malignant obstruction where ERCP fails: endoscopic ultrasonography-guided choledochoduodenostomy versus percutaneous drainage. J Clin Gastroenterol 2012;46:768–774. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0b013e31825f264c
  17. Lee TH, Choi JH, Park do H, et al. Similar efficacies of endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural and percutaneous drainage for malignant distal biliary obstruction. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016;14:1011–1019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2015.12.032
  18. Sharaiha RZ, Khan MA, Kamal F, et al. Efficacy and safety of EUS-guided biliary drainage in comparison with percutaneous biliary drainage when ERCP fails: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2017;85:904–914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2016.12.023
  19. Bang JY, Navaneethan U, Hasan M, et al. Stent placement by EUS or ERCP for primary biliary decompression in pancreatic cancer: a randomized trial (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2018;88:9–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2018.03.012
  20. Paik WH, Lee TH, Park DH, et al. EUS-guided biliary drainage versus ERCP for the primary palliation of malignant biliary obstruction: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Am J Gastroenterol 2018;113:987–997. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41395-018-0122-8
  21. Park JK, Woo YS, Noh DH, et al. Efficacy of EUS-guided and ERCP-guided biliary drainage for malignant biliary obstruction: prospective randomized controlled study. Gastrointest Endosc 2018;88:277–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2018.03.015
  22. Fabbri C, Fugazza A, Binda C, et al. Beyond palliation: using EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy with a lumen-apposing metal stent as a bridge to surgery. A case series. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis 2019;28:125–128.
  23. Gaujoux S, Jacques J, Bourdariat R, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy following endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy with electrocautery-enhanced lumen-apposing stents an ACHBT: SFED study. HPB (Oxford) 2021;23:154–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2020.06.001
  24. Koutlas NJ, LePage EM, Lucioni T, et al. Preoperative endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy facilitates decompression and diagnosis in patients with suspected malignant biliary obstruction: a case series. Cureus 2022;14:e23209. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.23209
  25. Mukai S, Itoi T, Tsuchiya T, et al. Clinical feasibility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage for preoperative management of malignant biliary obstruction (with videos). J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2023;30:983–992. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.1292
  26. Sundaram S, Mane K, Patil P, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided antegrade stent placement in patients with failed ERCP as a modality of preoperative and palliative biliary drainage. Dig Dis Sci 2023;68:1551–1558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-022-07655-w
  27. Tyberg A, Sarkar A, Shahid HM, et al. EUS-guided biliary drainage versus ERCP in malignant biliary obstruction before hepatobiliary surgery: an international multicenter comparative study. J Clin Gastroenterol 2023;57:962–966. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000001795
  28. Jacques J, Privat J, Pinard F, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy with electrocautery-enhanced lumen-apposing stents: a retrospective analysis. Endoscopy 2019;51:540–547. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0735-9137
  29. Tsuchiya T, Teoh AY, Itoi T, et al. Long-term outcomes of EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy using a lumen-apposing metal stent for malignant distal biliary obstruction: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2018;87:1138–1146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2017.08.017
  30. Akashi M, Nagakawa Y, Hosokawa Y, et al. Preoperative cholangitis is associated with increased surgical site infection following pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2020;27:640–647. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.783
  31. Darnell EP, Wang TJ, Lumish MA, et al. Preoperative cholangitis is an independent risk factor for mortality in patients after pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer. Am J Surg 2021;221:134–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.07.025
  32. Kawakubo K, Isayama H, Kato H, et al. Multicenter retrospective study of endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage for malignant biliary obstruction in Japan. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2014;21:328–334. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.27