DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Factors affecting anastomosis failure in microvascular fibula flap reconstruction of the maxillofacial region: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Elahe Tahmasebi (Research Center for Prevention of Oral and Dental Diseases, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Samira Hajisadeghi (Research Center for Prevention of Oral and Dental Diseases, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Shervin Shafiei (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Hamidreza Moslemi (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Reza Tabrizi (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Mohammad Hosein Kalantar Motamedi (Research Center for Prevention of Oral and Dental Diseases, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences)
  • Received : 2023.06.28
  • Accepted : 2023.11.20
  • Published : 2025.02.28

Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the contributory factors and failure rates in anastomosis during microvascular fibula flap reconstruction in maxillomandibular regions. A comprehensive search strategy was employed across databases including MEDLINE, Web of Science, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochraneʼs CENTRAL, as well as grey literature sources, and manual searches of noteworthy journals, covering studies from inception up to April 2023. The inclusion criteria targeted retrospective or prospective cohort and clinical studies that investigated functional and dental rehabilitation outcomes in human subjects undergoing maxillofacial reconstruction using microvascular fibula flaps. Exclusion criteria encompassed case-control studies, alternative reconstruction method research, and animal-based investigations. The studyʼs findings revealed a cumulative vascular failure rate of 6%. Subsequent analysis delineated the primary causes of this failure, attributing 3% to venous thrombosis, 1% to arterial thrombosis, and less than 1% to blood vessel compression due to hematoma. However, notable heterogeneity across the studies indicates substantial variability in vascular failure rates reported. These results of our review and meta-analysis underscore the intricate factors impacting anastomosis success, such as anastomosis technique, recipient vessel quality, the choice between couplers.

Keywords

References

  1. van Gemert J, Holtslag I, van der Bilt A, Merkx M, Koole R, Van Cann E. Health-related quality of life after segmental resection of the lateral mandible: free fibula flap versus plate reconstruction. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2015;43:658-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2015.03.018
  2. Prakash P, Bahri R, Bhandari SK. Maxillofacial defects: impact on psychology and esthetics. In: Levine MP, Santos JS, eds. Beauty- cosmetic science, cultural issues and creative developments. IntechOpen; 2021.
  3. Cho AM, Lopez J, Teven CM, Pourtaheri N, Do NTK, Jazayeri HE, et al. Outcomes in pediatric maxillofacial reconstruction with vascularized fibular flaps: a systematic review. J Craniofac Surg 2022;33:1346-51. https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000008511
  4. Pitak-Arnnop P, Hemprich A, Dhanuthai K, Pausch NC. Fibular flap for mandibular reconstruction: are there old tricks for an old dog? Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac Chir Orale 2013;114:15-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stomax.2012.05.001
  5. Bueno de Vicente A, Almeida F, Nuñez JA, Picon M, Acero J. Intraoral anastomosis in maxillary microvascular reconstruction after oncological excision. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2021;50:1161-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2021.01.008
  6. Umezawa H, Ogawa R, Nakamizo M, Yokoshima K, Hyakusoku H. A comparison of microsurgical venous anastomosis techniques. J Nippon Med Sch 2015;82:14-20. https://doi.org/10.1272/jnms.82.14
  7. Pafitanis G, Nicolaides M, O'Connor EF, Raveendran M, Ermogenous P, Psaras G, et al. Microvascular anastomotic arterial coupling: a systematic review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2021;74:1286-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2020.12.090
  8. Chatterjee D, Rahman Z, Harsha KN, Sharma J, Rai R, Menon A. Reconstruction of complex oro-mandibular defects by four different modifications of free fibula osteomyocutaneous flap: a prudent alternative to multiple flaps. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2022;75:3346-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2022.04.060
  9. Schultz BD, Sosin M, Nam A, Mohan R, Zhang P, Khalifian S, et al. Classification of mandible defects and algorithm for microvascular reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015;135:743e-754e. https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000001106
  10. Li R, Zhang R, He W, Qiao Y, Li W. The use of venous coupler device in free tissue transfers for oral and maxillofacial reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015;73:2225-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2015.06.153
  11. Assoumane A, Wang L, Liu K, Shang ZJ. Use of couplers for vascular anastomoses in 601 free flaps for reconstruction of defects of the head and neck: technique and two-year retrospective clinical study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017;55:461-4. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2016.10.001
  12. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021;372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
  13. Abramowicz S, Goudy SL, Mitchell CE, Prickett K, Marchica C, Austin TM, et al. A protocol for resection and immediate reconstruction of pediatric mandibles using microvascular free fibula flaps. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2021;79:475-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2020.08.020
  14. Aksoyler D, Losco L, Bolletta A, Ercan A, Chen SH, VelazquezMujica J, et al. Three salvage strategies in microvascular fibula osteocutaneous flap for mandible reconstruction with vascular compromise and establishment of an algorithm. Microsurgery 2021;41:223-32. https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.30720
  15. Gaggl A, Bürger H, Virnik SA, Chiari FM. An intraoral anastomosing technique for microvascular bone flaps in alveolar ridge reconstruction: first clinical results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;38:921-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2009.03.722
  16. González-García R, Naval-Gías L, Rodríguez-Campo FJ, Martínez-Chacón JL, Gil-Díez Usandizaga JL. Vascularized fibular flap for reconstruction of the condyle after mandibular ablation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;66:1133-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2007.06.680
  17. Han Z, Li J, Li H, Su M, Qin L. Single versus dual venous anastomoses of the free fibula osteocutaneous flap in mandibular reconstruction: a retrospective study. Microsurgery 2013;33:652-5. https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.22176
  18. Johal KS, Chen HC. Interpositional vein grafting for significant size discrepancy: the important role for short, sequential grafts in step-up and step-down microvascular anastomoses. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2022;75:659-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2021.09.012
  19. Pohlenz P, Blessmann M, Blake F, Li L, Schmelzle R, Heiland M. Outcome and complications of 540 microvascular free flaps: the Hamburg experience. Clin Oral Investig 2007;11:89-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-006-0073-0
  20. Ritschl LM, Niu M, Pippich K, Schuh P, Rommel N, Fichter AM, et al. Superficial temporal artery and vein as alternative recipient vessels for intraoral reconstruction with free flaps to avoid the cervical approach with the resulting need for double flap transfer in previously treated necks. Front Oncol 2022;12:879086. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.879086
  21. Rosenthal E, Carroll W, Dobbs M, Scott Magnuson J, Wax M, Peters G. Simplifying head and neck microvascular reconstruction. Head Neck 2004;26:930-6. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.20076
  22. Schardt C, Schmid A, Bodem J, Krisam J, Hoffmann J, Mertens C. Donor site morbidity and quality of life after microvascular head and neck reconstruction with free fibula and deep-circumflex iliac artery flaps. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2017;45:304-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2016.11.014
  23. Vernier-Mosca M, Feuvrier D, Obert L, Mauvais O, Loisel F, Pluvy I. [Use of coupler for venous anastomoses in cervico-facial reconstruction. Retrospective study on 51 free flaps]. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 2020;65:236-43. French. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anplas.2019.06.011
  24. Mücke T, Rau A, Merezas A, Kanatas A, Mitchell DA, Wagenpfeil S, et al. Changes of perfusion of microvascular free flaps in the head and neck: a prospective clinical study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014;52:810-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2014.07.001
  25. Senthil Murugan M, Ravi P, Mohammed Afradh K, Tatineni V, Krishnakumar Raja VB. Comparison of the efficacy of venous coupler and hand-sewn anastomosis in maxillofacial reconstruction using microvascular fibula free flaps: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018;47:854-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2018.01.016
  26. Parise GK, Guebur MI, Ramos GHA, Groth AK, da Silva ABD, Sassi LM. Evaluation of complications and flap losses in mandibular reconstruction with microvascularized fibula flap. Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018;22:281-4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-018-0701-
  27. Shimbo K, Kawamoto H, Koshima I. Venous end-to-side anastomosis for free-flap reconstruction in the extremities: a case series and meta-analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2023;83:4-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2023.05.004
  28. Shimbo K, Shinomiya R, Sunagawa T, Okuhara Y, Adachi N. Analysis of anastomotic venous factors in traumatic lower extremity injuries reconstructed by free flap. Cureus 2022;14:e20978. https:// doi.org/10.7759/cureus.20978
  29. Uchibori T, Takanari K, Nakamura R, Kambe M, Ebisawa K, Nakamura Y, et al. Multiple thrombi during microvascular anastomosis caused by decreased antithrombin activity: a case report. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2020;8:e2872. https://doi.org/10.1097/gox.0000000000002872
  30. Biglioli F, Rabagliati M, Gatti S, Brusati R. Kinking of pedicle vessels and its effect on blood flow and patency in free flaps: an experimental study in rats. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2004;32:94-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2003.12.001
  31. Abe T, Kitada H, Sato J, Yamazaki Y, Notani K, Yamaguchi T, et al. Successful total mandibular reconstruction using a fibular graft with long-term follow-up: a case report. Asian J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;23:196-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajoms.2011.04.003
  32. Portinho CP, Jungblut CF, Bonilha LZ, Berteli JR, Collares MVM. [Microsurgical reconstruction of mandible with free fibula flap]. Rev AMRIGS 2015;59:39-54. Portuguese.
  33. Head LK, McKay DR. Economic comparison of hand-sutured and coupler-assisted microvascular anastomoses. J Reconstr Microsurg 2018;34:71-6. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1606540
  34. Chaput B, Vergez S, Somda S, Mojallal A, Riot S, Vairel B, et al. Comparison of single and double venous anastomoses in head and neck oncologic reconstruction using free flaps: a meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016;137:1583-94. https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000002087
  35. Heidekrueger P, von Fritschen U, Moellhoff N, Germann G, Giunta R, Zeman F, et al. Comparison of venous couplers versus handsewn technique in 4577 cases of DIEP-flap breast reconstructions - a multicenter study. Microsurgery 2022;42:5-12. https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.30686
  36. Rysz M, Kissin F. Differences in free flaps' reconstructions with and without coupling device for venous anastomosis. Otolaryngol Pol 2021;76:6-12. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.3207
  37. Erdmann D, Meade RA, Lins RE, McCann RL, Richardson WJ, Levin LS. Use of the microvascular free fibula transfer as a salvage reconstruction for failed anterior spine surgery due to chronic osteomyelitis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;117:2438-45; discussion 2446-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000219077.73229.af
  38. Weitz J, Wolff KD, Kesting MR, Nobis CP. Development of a novel resection and cutting guide for mandibular reconstruction using free fibula flap. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2018;46:1975-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2018.09.007
  39. de Vicente JC, Rodríguez-Santamarta T, de Villalaín L, Ruiz-Ranz M, Rodríguez-Torres N, Cobo JL. Risk factors associated with fixation-related complications in microsurgical free flap reconstruction of the mandible. Microsurgery 2023;43:27-38. https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.30888
  40. Handschin AE, Guggenheim M, Calcagni M, Künzi W, Giovanoli P. Factor V Leiden mutation and thrombotic occlusion of microsurgical anastomosis after free TRAM flap. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 2010;16:199-203. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076029608325546
  41. Rothweiler RM, Metzger MC, Zieger B, Huber-Schumacher S, Schmelzeisen R, Kalbhenn J. The role of von Willebrand factor in microvascular surgery in severely injured patients. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2021;9:e3836. https://doi.org/10.1097/gox.0000000000003836
  42. Ritschl LM, Niu M, Wolff CT, Schwarz M, Roth M, Wolff KD, et al. Blood flow analyses by intraoperative transit-time flow measurements of free flaps for head and neck reconstructions: a prospective single-center study. Microsurgery 2023;43:99-108. https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.30967
  43. Ettinger KS, Alexander AE, Arce K. Computed tomographic angiography perforator localization for virtual surgical planning of osteocutaneous fibular free flaps in head and neck reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018;76:2220-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2018.04.002
  44. Schuderer JG, Meier JK, Klingelhöffer C, Gottsauner M, Reichert TE, Wendl CM, et al. Magnetic resonance angiography for free fibula harvest: anatomy and perforator mapping. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2020;49:176-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2019.09.005
  45. Battaglia S, Maiolo V, Savastio G, Zompatori M, Contedini F, Antoniazzi E, et al. Osteomyocutaneous fibular flap harvesting: computer-assisted planning of perforator vessels using computed tomographic angiography scan and cutting guide. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2017;45:1681-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2017.07.017