DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of Effective Dose and Image Quality According to Arm height angle(AHA) during Chest Lateral Radiography : Retrospective Research

흉부 측면 방사선 검사 시 팔 높이 각도(AHA)에 따른 유효선량과 화질 평가 : 후향적 연구

  • Kang-Min Lee (Department of Radiology, Korea University Anam Hospital)
  • 이강민 (고려대학교 안암병원 영상의학과)
  • Received : 2024.11.07
  • Accepted : 2024.11.30
  • Published : 2024.11.30

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the effects of Arm Height Angle (Arm Heiht Angle : AHA) on patient effective dose and image quality in lateral chest radiography, and to propose the optimal arm positioning for minimizing radiation exposure while ensuring diagnostic efficacy. Using consistent X-ray equipment with Automatic Exposure Control (AEC), examinations were performed on 10 patients at AHA settings of 90°, 120°, and 150°. For each angle, Dose-Area Product (DAP) values were measured, and effective dose was calculated using the Monte Carlo simulation-based software PCXMC 2.0. The findings revealed a 53% increase in effective dose when AHA was adjusted from 150° to 120°, although this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.3). However, setting the AHA to 90° resulted in an approximately 140% increase in effective dose, a statistically significant change (p=0.00). Quantitative assessment showed no statistically significant differences in image quality metrics across the 90°, 120°, and 150° groups, as measured by TT SNR (p=0.1), TT CNR (p=0.6), AA SNR (p=0.2), AA CNR (p=0.8), LA SNR (p=0.2), and LA CNR (p=0.8). Visual assessments indicated that the 150° AHA setting received the highest scores, suggesting that an arm height angle of 150° or greater may optimize image quality while reducing patient radiation exposure. Based on these results, this study recommends an AHA of 150° or higher as the optimal positioning for lateral chest radiography, providing an effective balance between radiation dose minimization and diagnostic image quality.

본 연구는 흉부 측면 X선 촬영에서 팔 높이 각도 (Arm Height Angle : AHA)가 환자의 유효선량과 영상 화질에 미치는 영향을 평가하고, 최적의 팔 위치를 제안하기 위해 수행되었다. 동일 X선 장비와 자동 노출제어(AEC) 시스템을 이용하여 10명의 환자를 대상으로 AHA를 90°, 120°, 150°로 설정하여 촬영을 진행하였다. 각도 별 DAP 값을 측정하고, 몬테카를로 시뮬레이션 기반 컴퓨터 프로그램인 PCXMC 2.0을 통해 유효선량을 계산하였다. 연구 결과, AHA를 150°에서 120°로 변경했을 때 유효선량이 약 53% 증가하였으나 통계적으로 유의미한 차이는 없었다(p=0.3). 반면, AHA를 90°로 설정했을 때 유효선량이 약 140% 증가하며 통계적으로 유의미한 차이를 보였다(p=0.00). 정량적 분석 결과는 TT SNR (p=0.1), TT CNR (p=0.6), AA SNR (p=0.2), AA CNR (p=0.8), LA SNR (p=0.2), LA CNR (p=0.8) 통계적 분석에서 90°, 120°, 150° 그룹 간 유의미한 차이는 나타나지 않았으며 그룹 간 영상 화질 차이는 없었다. 시각적 평가 결과에서는 AHA 150°가 가장 높은 점수를 받아 팔 높이 각도 150° 이상이 진단적 화질을 유지하면서 환자의 방사선 노출을 줄이는 데 유리한 조건임을 시사한다. 본 연구 결과는 흉부 측면 X선 촬영에서 AHA 150° 이상의 팔 높이가 최적의 조건임을 제안하며 방사선량 감소와 진단적 영상 화질의 균형을 효과적으로 제공할 수 있을 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. M. J. Kim, K. H Do, K. P. Kim, J. Y. Hwang, H. J. Choi, S. K. Kim. "A study on the radiation dose management system and plan for patients", Korea Health & Medical Research Institute, pp. 1-155, 2014.
  2. J. S. Lee, S. J Ko, S. S Kang, J. H. Kim, D. H. Kim, C. S. Kim, "Quantitative Evaluation of Image Quality using Automatic Exposure Control Sensitivity in the Digital Chest Image", The Korea Contents Association, Vol. 13, No. 8, pp. 275-283, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2013.13.08.275
  3. H. W. Kang, J. C. Park, H. S. Kang, I. J Lee, H. S. Shin, J. Huh, "The Evaluation of Chest Radiographic System", Journal of radiological science and technology, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 31-35, 1987.
  4. S. U. Kim, C . H. Lim, Y. C . Joo, S. Y. Yu, "Effects of Change in Patient Position on Radiation Dose to Surrounding Organs During Chest Lateral Radiography with Auto Exposure Control Mode", Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology, Vol. 17, No. 6, pp. 903-909, 2023. https://doi.org/10.7742/jksr.2023.17.6.903
  5. J. H. Hwang, J. H. Jeong, H. S. Kim, K. B. Lee, "Study on the Change of Absorbed Dose and Image Quality according to X-ray Condition of Detector in Digital Radiography(DR)", The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, Vol. 17, No. 9, pp. 99-106, 2017. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2017.17.09.099
  6. S. M. R. Rizzo, M. K. Kalra, B. Schmidt, "Automatic Exposure Control Techniques for Individual Dose Adaptation", Radiology, Vol. 235, No. 1, pp. 335-337, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2351041751
  7. D. U Seong, "A study on patient dose history management in the field of radiology", Ministry of Food and Drug Safety research report, Vol. 111, No. 72, pp. 852, 2013.
  8. ICRP, "1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection", International Commission on Radiological Protection, Vol. 21, No. 1-3, pp. 1-201, 1991.
  9. ICRP, "The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103", International Commission on Radiological Protection, Vol. 37, No. 2-4, pp. 1-332, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icrp.2007.10.003
  10. https://www.auntminnie.com/clinical-news/article/15559130/mastering-ap-and-lateral-positioning-for-chest-xray
  11. P. Doyle, D. Gentle, C. J. Martin, "Optimising automatic exposure control in computed radiography and the impact on patient dose", Radiation Protection Dosimetry, Vol. 114, No. 1-3, pp. 236-239, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/nch548