Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia

World Association for Triple Helix and Future Strategy Studies (세계트리플헬릭스미래전략학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Teun A. Van Dijk's Critical Discourse Analysis on Page Three of the Parliamentary Bulletin Edition 1200-1210

  • Published : 2024.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The government utilizes communication to share messages within the internal environment and society. The People's Representative Council of the Republic of Indonesia (DPR RI) employs the Parliamentary Bulletin for this purpose, recognizing its effectiveness in fostering positive community relations. This study tries to elucidate the text's tactical maneuvers for reshaping political players' public personas in Parliamentary Bulletins and dismantling societal structures in speeches. This study examines the DPR's communication techniques in Parliamentary Bulletins using Teun A. Van Dijk's theory, which describes deliberate activities that weaken social institutions and influence political actors' opinions. The study investigates Puan Maharani's persistent presence on page three using Van Dijk's analysis from the 1200-1210 edition and qualitative approaches. In reality, 575 DPR RI members from 9 factions in 80 electoral districts can be sources of information. These findings show that media texts strategically portray political figures in the public sphere, influencing perceptions based on Berlo's image theory and Habermas' communicative ratio. Puan dominates the display of titles, profile introductions, and news stories. The discourse's social structure is divided into three levels: macrostructure, superstructure, and microstructure. This study focuses on the relationship between media representation, deliberative democracy, and public access to comprehensive information.

Keywords

References

  1. Allen, R. J., & Pardo, M. S. (2019). Relative plausibility and its critics. International Journal of Evidence and Proof, 23(1-2), 5-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365712718813781
  2. Arjanto, D. (2022, August). Capres 2024: Simak Peringkat Ganjar Pranowo dalam 3 Survei. Tempo Nasional. https://Nasional.Tempo.Co/Read/1626254/Capres-2024-Simak-Peringkat-Ganjar-Pranowo-Dalam-3-Survei
  3. Benoit, W. L. (1997). Image repair discourse and crisis communication. Public Relations Review, 23(2), 177-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(97)90023-0
  4. Berlo, D. K. (1977). Communication as Process: Review and Commentary. Annals of the International Communication Association, 1(1), 7-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.1977.11923667
  5. Buehlmaier, M. (2012). The Role of Media in Takeovers: Theory and Evidence. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1673164
  6. De Angelis, G. (2021). Habermas, democracy and the public sphere: Theory and practice. European Journal of Social Theory, 24(4), 437-447. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310211038753
  7. Dijk, J. Van. (2010). Review of Manuel Castells (2009) Communication power. Communications, the European Journal of Communication Research, 35(2), 247-250.
  8. Feteris, E. T. (2017). Habermas's discourse theory and the rationality of legal discourse. In Argumentation Library (Vol. 1, pp. 77-93). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1129-4_5
  9. Getty, J. M., & Thompson, K. N. (1994). A Procedure for Scaling Perceptions of Lodging Quality. Hospitality Research Journal, 18(2), 75-88. https://doi.org/10.1177/109634809401800206
  10. Goffman, E. (2001). Characteristics of Total Institutions Erving Goffman. Wire. 
  11. Goidel, K., Davis, N. T., & Goidel, S. (2021). Changes in perceptions of media bias. Research and Politics, 8(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168020987441
  12. Gramsci, A. (2021). Tva anteckningar ur "Amerikanism och fordism". Arkiv. Tidskrift For Samhallsanalys, 13(4), 100-113. https://doi.org/10.13068/2000-6217.13.4
  13. Gulley, H. E., & Berlo, D. K. (1956). Effect of intercellular and intracellular speech structure on attitude change and learning. Speech Monographs, 23(4), 281-286. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637755609375186
  14. Gyollai, D. (2022). The sociocognitive approach in critical discourse studies and the phenomenological sociology of knowledge: intersections. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 21(3), 539-558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-020-09704-z
  15. Habermas, J. (1989). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere (Translated Massachusetts Institute of Technology). In Contemporary Sociology (Issue 2), 89-101.
  16. Habermas, J. (2010). The Public Sphere: An Encyclopedia Article (1974). In Crime and Media: A Reader. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367809195-3
  17. Habermas, J. (2020). The Tasks of a Critical Theory of Society. In Critical Theory and Society: A Reader. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003059509-31
  18. Habermas, J. (2021). A political constitution for the pluralist world society? Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 34(3), 383-400. https://doi.org/10.1163/15406253-03403003
  19. Habermas, J., Hardiman, F. B., Barbaza, R. E., & Barbaza, A. F. (2000). Discourse Theory and Its Context: Democratic States-Under-the-Rule-of-Law, Reform Movement and Cultural Diversity in East Asia. Humanitas Asiatica, 1(1), 5-20.
  20. Horkheimer, M. (1996). Theorie traditionnelle et theorie critique. In Collection Tel ; 277.
  21. Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. W. (2002). A industria cultural: o iluminismo como mistificacao de massas. Teoria Da Cultura de Massa.
  22. Humaira, H. W. (2018). Analisis Wacana Kritis (AWK) Model Teun a. Van Dijk Pada Pemberitaan Surat Kabar Republika. Jurnal Literasi, 2(1), 32-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.25157/literasi.v2i1.951
  23. Hutajulu, M. A. (2022, October). Survei IPS: Elektabilitas Prabowo Tembus 30%, Ganjar 20% dan Anies 17%. Detik News. https://News.Detik.Com/Pemilu/d-6356769/Survei-Ips-Elektabilitas-Prabowo-Tembus-30-Ganjar-20-Dan-Anies-17
  24. Irmayani, & Rahmi Usman. (2022). Critical Discourse Analysis of Van Dijk on Voi News of Formula E "Jakarta E-Prix" in Political Issues. JLE: Journal of Literate of English Education Study Program, 3(1), 32-46. https://doi.org/10.47435/jle.v3i01.1081
  25. Jorgensen, M., & Phillips, L. (2012). Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. In Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208871
  26. Kentikelenis, A., & Rochford, C. (2019). Power asymmetries in global governance for health: a conceptual framework for analyzing the political-economic determinants of health inequities. Globalization and Health, 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-019-0516-4
  27. Lukacs, G. (2000). A defence of history and class consciousness: Tailism and the dialectic (E. Leslie, Ed. & Trans.). London: Verso.
  28. Marcuse, H. (2012). Eros and Civilization. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203714607
  29. Mcquail, D. (1987). Teori Komunikasi Massa Suatu pengantar. Jakarta: Erlangga.
  30. McQuail, D. (1985). Sociology of mass communication. Annual Review of Sociology, 11, 93-111. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.11.1.93
  31. McQuail, D. (1992). Media performance: mass communication and the public interest. Choice Reviews Online, 30(4), 30-1900. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.30-1900
  32. McQuail, D. (1994). The rise of media of mass communication. In Mass Communication Theory: An Introduction (pp.1-35). Sage.
  33. Mead, G. H. (2022). 8. Play, the Game, and the Generalized Other. In Theories of Social Order (pp. 183-202). Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503627116-013
  34. Poernomo, M. I. (2021). Komunikasi elit politik. Sidoarjo: Nizamia Learning Center.
  35. Prahassacitta, V. (2017). Citizen Journalism in Cyber Media: Protection and Legal Responsibility Under Indonesian Press Law. Humaniora, 8(1), 45-56. https://doi.org/10.21512/humaniora.v8i1.3695
  36. Rasmussen, D. (2012). Critical theory: Horkheimer, Adorno, Habermas. In Twentieth-Century Continental Philosophy. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203826386
  37. Safrudin, I. (2004). Etika Emansipatoris Jurgen Habermas : Etika Paradigmatik di Wilayah Praksis. Mediator, 5(1), 1-13.
  38. Seran, A. (2010). Kritik Atas Ekonomi Pasar Bebas. Respons, 15(2), 105-121.
  39. Sujatmiko, S. (2020). Van Dijk Modelling on Critical Discourse Analysis (A Study on Mata Najwa Program 'Gara-Gara Tagar' In Trans 7 In September 5th 2018). ELTICS : Journal of English Language Teaching and English Linguistics, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.31316/eltics.v5i1.533
  40. Van Dijk, T. A. (2009). Society and discourse: How social contexts influence text and talk. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511575273
  41. Varnava, A. (2018). Review of "The Greek Cypriot Nationalist Right in the Era of British Colonialism: Emergence, Mobilisation and Transformations of Right-Wing Party Politics." Reviews in History. https://doi.org/10.14296/rih/2014/2264
  42. Weber, M. (2002). Sociologia da imprensa: um programa de pesquisa. Lua Nova: Revista de Cultura e Politica, 55-56. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-64452002000100008
  43. Zhan, E. (2022, September). Charta Politika Rilis Hasil Survei Elektabilitas Capres 2024, Ganjar, Prabowo, & Anies Unggul!. Kompas TV. https://Www.Kompas.Tv/Article/331151/Charta-Politika-Rilis-Hasil-Survei-Elektabilitas-Capres-2024-Ganjar-Prabowo-Anies-Unggul