The Journal of Korean Physical Therapy

  • 제36권5호
  • /
  • Pages.177-183
  • /
  • 2024
  • /
  • 1229-0475(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-156X(eISSN)
대한물리치료학회 (The Korean Society of Physical Therapy)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Immediate Effects of Warm-Up Protocols, Including Dynamic Stretching on Explosive Strength of Knee Extensors

  • Jeongwoo Jeon (Digital Healthcare Institute, College of Health Sciences, Sunmoon University)
  • 투고 : 2024.09.20
  • 심사 : 2024.10.21
  • 발행 : 2024.10.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose: Variables, such as torque and power, have been measured to evaluate the muscle function. This study examined the effects of a warm-up protocol, including dynamic stretching (DS), on the explosive strength of knee extensors, as well as torque and power. Methods: Twenty-nine healthy young adults participated in this study. Three warm-up protocols, including DS of knee extensors, were used as interventions: (1) DS, (2) DS combined with antagonist muscle static stretching (AMSS), and (3) DS combined with repetitive passive movements (RPM). The outcome measures were the following variables of the knee extensors evaluated using an isokinetic dynamometer: rate of torque and velocity development (RTD and RVD), isometric and isokinetic peak torque (PT), and average power (AP). Results: The results of the two-way (warm-up and time) repeated-measures ANOVA revealed a main effect of time for isometric PT (p=0.001). Post-hoc analysis revealed a significant increase in isometric PT in the post-test compared to the pre-test regarding the DSAMSS (p=0.001) and DS-RPM (p=0.047) warm-up protocols. Conclusion: The three warm-up protocols (DS, DS-AMSS, and DS-RPM) do not appear to influence explosive strength and isokinetic strength at a rapid angular velocity. Considering the relatively high volume of DS used in this study, this may be due to the influence of muscle fatigue. These findings suggest that tailored warm-up protocols for fast muscle contraction and joint acceleration, unlike isometric PT corresponding to static contraction, may require a different approach from existing methods.

키워드

과제정보

This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (RS-2023-00249155).

참고문헌

  1. Bishop D. Warm up I: potential mechanisms and the effects of passive warm up on exercise performance. Sports med. 2003;33(6):439-54.
  2. Behm DG, Chaouachi A. A review of the acute effects of static and dynamic stretching on performance. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2011;111(11):2633-51.
  3. Norris CM. The complete guide to stretching. United Kingdom, A & C Black Ltd, 1999:23-76.
  4. Ayala F, Croix MDS, De Baranda PS et al. Acute effects of two different stretching techniques on isokinetic strength and power. Rev Andal Med Deport. 2015;8(3):93-102.
  5. Matsuo S, Iwata M, Miyazaki M et al. Changes in flexibility and force are not different after static versus dynamic stretching. Sports Med Int Open. 2019;3(3):E89-95.
  6. Opplert J, Babault N. Acute effects of dynamic stretching on muscle flexibility and performance: an analysis of the current literature. Sports Med. 2018;48(2):299-325.
  7. Walsh GS. Effect of static and dynamic muscle stretching as part of warm up procedures on knee joint proprioception and strength. Hum Mov Sci. 2017;55:189-95.
  8. Ce E, Coratella G, Doria C et al. No effect of passive stretching on neuromuscular function and maximum force-generating capacity in the antagonist muscle. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2021;121(7):1955-65.
  9. Miranda H, Maia MDF, Paz GA et al. Acute effects of antagonist static stretching in the inter-set rest period on repetition performance and muscle activation. Res Sports Med. 2015;23(1):37-50.
  10. Serefoglu A, Sekir U, Gur H et al. Effects of static and dynamic stretching on the isokinetic peak torques and electromyographic activities of the antagonist muscles. J Sports Sci Med. 2017;16(1):6-13.
  11. Shahtout J, Henry S, Ito D et al. The acute effects of antagonist stretching on agonist movement economy. Int J Exerc Sci. 2020;13(4):1295-304.
  12. Osawa Y, Studenski SA, Ferrucci L. Knee extension rate of torque development and peak torque: associations with lower extremity function. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2018;9(3):530-9.
  13. Rodriguez-Rosell D, Pareja-Blanco F, Aagaard P et al. Physiological and methodological aspects of rate of force development assessment in human skeletal muscle. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2018;38(5):743-62.
  14. Maffiuletti NA, Aagaard P, Blazevich AJ et al. Rate of force development: physiological and methodological considerations. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016;116(6):1091-116.
  15. Brown LE, Sjostrom T, Comeau MJ et al. Kinematics of biophysically asymmetric limbs within rate of velocity development. J Strength Cond Res. 2005;19(2):298-301.
  16. Osawa Y, Studenski SA, Ferrucci L. Knee extension rate of velocity development affects walking performance differently in men and women. Exp Gerontol. 2018;112:63-7.
  17. Thompson BJ, Conchola EC, Palmer TB et al. Effects of aging on maximal and rapid velocity capacities of the leg extensors. Exp Gerontol. 2014;58:128-31.
  18. Crone C, Nielsen J. Spinal mechanisms in man contributing to reciprocal inhibition during voluntary dorsiflexion of the foot. J Physiol. 1989;416(1):255-72.
  19. Hirabayashi R, Edama M, Kojima S et al. Enhancement of spinal reciprocal inhibition depends on the movement speed and range of repetitive passive movement. Eur J Neurosci. 2020;52(8):3929-43.
  20. Geertsen SS, Lundbye-Jensen J, Nielsen JB. Increased central facilitation of antagonist reciprocal inhibition at the onset of dorsiflexion following explosive strength training. J Appl Physiol. 2008;105(3):915-22.
  21. Hirabayashi R, Edama M, Kojima S et al. Effects of repetitive passive movement on ankle joint on spinal reciprocal inhibition. Exp Brain Res. 2019;237(12):3409-17.
  22. Ju Y, Liu Y, Cheng HK et al. Rapid repetitive passive movement improves knee proprioception. Clin Biomech. 2011;26(2):188-93.
  23. Tsuiki S, Sasaki R, Pham MV et al. Repetitive passive movement modulates corticospinal excitability: effect of movement and rest cycles and subject attention. Front Behav Neurosci. 2019;13:38.
  24. Behm DG, Blazevich AJ, Kay AD et al. Acute effects of muscle stretching on physical performance, range of motion, and injury incidence in healthy active individuals: a systematic review. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2016;41(1):1-11.
  25. Vieira DCL, Opplert J, Babault N et al. Acute effects of dynamic stretching on neuromechanical properties: an interaction between stretching, contraction, and movement. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2021;121(3):957-67.
  26. Niespodzinski B, Kochanowicz A, Mieszkowski J et al. Relationship between joint position sense, force sense, and muscle strength and the impact of gymnastic training on proprioception. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018(1):5353242.
  27. Luc-Harkey BA, Blackburn JT, Ryan ED et al. Quadriceps rate of torque development and disability in persons with tibiofemoral osteoarthritis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2018;48(9):694-703.
  28. Wang X, Ma Z, Teng X. Isokinetic strength test of muscle strength and motor function in total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Surg. 2020;12(3):878-89.
  29. Grbic V, Djuric S, Knezevic OM et al. A novel two-velocity method for elaborate isokinetic testing of knee extensors. Int J Sports Med. 2017;38(10):741-6.
  30. Sekir U, Arabaci R, Akova B et al. Acute effects of static and dynamic stretching on leg flexor and extensor isokinetic strength in elite women athletes. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2010;20(2):268-81.
  31. Fukaya T, Matsuo S, Iwata M et al. Acute and chronic effects of static stretching at 100% versus 120% intensity on flexibility. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2021;121(2):513-23.
  32. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. United Kingdom, Routledge, 2013:8-13.
  33. Ye X, Beck TW, Wages NP. Influence of prolonged static stretching on motor unit firing properties. Muscle Nerve. 2016;53(5):808-17.
  34. Sasaki R, Tsuiki S, Miyaguchi S et al. Repetitive passive finger movement modulates primary somatosensory cortex excitability. Front Hum Neurosci. 2018;12:332.
  35. Turki O, Chaouachi A, Behm DG et al. The effect of warm-ups incorporating different volumes of dynamic stretching on 10-and 20-m sprint performance in highly trained male athletes. J Strength Cond Res. 2012;26(1):63-72.
  36. Costa PB, Herda TJ, Herda AA et al. Effects of dynamic stretching on strength, muscle imbalance, and muscle activation. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013;46(3):586-93.
  37. Quinlan JI, Maganaris CN, Franchi MV et al. Muscle and tendon contributions to reduced rate of torque development in healthy older males. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2018;73(4):539-45.
  38. Thorstensson A, Grimby G, Karlsson J. Force-velocity relations and fiber composition in human knee extensor muscles. J Appl Physiol. 1976;40(1):12-6.
  39. Westerblad H, Bruton JD, Katz A. Skeletal muscle: energy metabolism, fiber types, fatigue and adaptability. Exp Cell Biol. 2010;316(18):3093-9.
  40. Bojsen-Moller J, Magnusson SP, Rasmussen LR et al. Muscle performance during maximal isometric and dynamic contractions is influenced by the stiffness of the tendinous structures. J Appl Physiol. 2005;99(3):986-94.