한국가스학회지 (Journal of the Korean Institute of Gas)

  • 제28권3호
  • /
  • Pages.21-35
  • /
  • 2024
  • /
  • 1226-8402(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6922(eISSN)
한국가스학회 (The Korean Institute of GAS)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

HyRAM+, PHAST 그리고 ITALY LUP을 이용한 수소충전소 위험성 평가

Risk Assessment of Hydrogen Charging Stations using HyRAM+, PHAST and Italy LUP

  • 김태호 (아주대학교 환경공학과) ;
  • 정승호 (아주대학교 환경안전공학과)
  • Tae-ho Kim (Dept. of Environmental Engineering, Ajou University) ;
  • Seungho Jung (Dept. of Environmental and Safety Engineering, Ajou University)
  • 투고 : 2024.05.16
  • 심사 : 2024.06.25
  • 발행 : 2024.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

기후변화로 인해 수소, 태양열, 풍력 등 오염물질을 방출하지 않는 에너지원들이 전 세계적으로 주목을 받고 있다. 대한민국에서는 2019년 '수소 경제 활성화 로드맵'을 통해 친환경 에너지원인 수소에 관한 관심을 높이고 있다. 이에 맞추어 수소 동력 보급을 적극적으로 추진하고 있어 수소충전소의 안전한 운영 및 위험관리 관련 연구가 필요하다. 본 연구에서는 미국 국립연구소 Sandia National Laboratory(SNL)의 report 값을 기반으로 위험성 평가 프로그램인 HyRAM+과 HyRAM+과 PHAST v8.7을 활용하여 위험성 평가를 시행하였다. 그 결과 HyRAM+을 활용하여 실시한 Jet fire 시나리오는 튜브 트레일러에서 40m의 가장 큰 영향범위를 도출했다. PHAST v8.7을 이용한 Catastrophic rupture 결과 튜브 트레일러에서 1psi의 영향범위는 240m로 가장 큰 영향범위를 도출했다. 추가로 ITALY의 Land Use Planning(LUP)를 사용하여 수소충전소의 위치 적합성을 판단한 결과 LUP 기준 F 지역으로 수소충전소는 적합한 위치인 것을 확인했다.

Due to climate change, energy sources that do not emit pollutants such as hydrogen, solar power, and wind power are attracting attention worldwide. In Korea, interest in hydrogen, an eco-friendly energy source, is increasing through the 'Roadmap to Revitalize the Hydrogen Economy' in 2019. In line with this, the supply of hydrogen is actively being promoted, so research related to the safe operation and risk management of hydrogen charging stations is needed. In this study, risk assessment was conducted using HyRAM+ and PHAST v8.7, which are risk assessment programs, based on the report value of the US National Laboratory Sandia National Laboratory (SNL). As a result, the Jet fire scenario conducted using HyRAM+ derived the greatest impact range of 40m in the tube trailer. As a result of Catastrophic rupture using PHAST v8.7, the greatest impact range of 1 psi in the tube trailer was derived with 240m. In addition, as a result of determining the location of the hydrogen charging station using ITALY's Land Use Planning (LUP), it was confirmed that the hydrogen charging station was an appropriate location as F area based on LUP.

키워드

과제정보

본 연구는 2024년도 산업통상자원부의 재원으로 한국산업기술진흥원의 산업혁신인재성장사업(과제번호 P0012787)으로 수행되었음.

참고문헌

  1. Ministry of Economy and Finance, 2018, Innovative Growh, https://www.moef.go.kr/.
  2. Ministry of Trade and Industry, Roadmap for activating hydrogen economy, (2019)
  3. Department of Employment and Labor, Hydrogen Safety Manual for Worker Safety, (2022)
  4. Ahn, B.J., Rhim, J.K., "Consequence Analysis of Hydrogen Filling Stations based on Cascade Compressing Systems", JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN INSTITUTE OF GAS, 25(2), 13-21, (2021)
  5. Park, W.I., Kang, S. K., Lee, I.W., Yang, Y.Y., Yu, C.H., "A Study on the Safety of Liquefied Hydrogen Refueling Station through Quantitative Risk Assessment. JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN INSTITUTE OF GAS, 27(4), 116-122, (2023)
  6. UNECE, Guidance on Land-Use Planning, the Siting of Hazardous Activities and related Safety Aspects, 43-47, (2017)
  7. Groth, K. M., Hecht, E. S., Reynolds, J. T. , "Methodology for assessing the safety of hydrogen systems: HyRAM 1.0 technical reference manual", Sandia Report, SAND2015-10216, (2015)
  8. Kim, H.S., Jeon, B.H., "Analysis of Impact Zone of Quantitative Risk Assessment based on Accident Scenarios by Meteorological Factors", Journal of Korean Society of Environmental Engineers, 39(12), 685-688, (2017)
  9. Park, S.W., Jung, S.H., "Recommended Evacuation Distance for Offsite Risk Assessment of Ammonia Release Scenarios", Journal of the Korean Society of Safety , 31(3), 156-161, (2016).
  10. Lim, J.Y., Kwon, D.H., Choi, S.K., Yu, C.H., "A Study on Quantitative Risk Analysis of Hydrogen Refueling Station Using HyRAM 3.0", Journal of Energy Engineering, 31(1), 38-46, (2022)
  11. SEO, D. H., KIM, T. H., RHIE, K. W., & CHOI, Y. E., "A Study on FTA of Off-Site Packaged Hydrogen Station" Transctions of the Korean Hydrogen and New Energy Society, 31(1), 73-81, (2020)
  12. Ministry of public administration and security, Resident registration population by administrative district (Eup-myeon-dong)/5 years old, 2023.01, (current status of resident registration population) (2011~)
  13. Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency, 2020, Technical Guidelines on the Selection of Accident Scenarios(P-107-2020).
  14. Jeffrey LaChance, William Houf, Bobby Middleton, and Larry Fluer, Analyses to Support Development of Risk-Informed Separation Distances for Hydrogen Codes and Standards, SANDIA REPORT (SAND2009-0874).
  15. Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency, 2012, Technical Guidelines for the Establishment of Measures to Minimize Damage to Chemical Factories(P-110-2012)
  16. Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency, 2021, Technical Guidelines for the Accident Damage Prediction Techniques(P-102-2021)
  17. Health and Safety Executive, 2001, Guidance on ALARP Decisions in COMAH, https://www.hse.gov.uk/foi/internalops/hid_circs/permissioning/spc _perm_37/.