Animal Bioscience

Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (아세아태평양축산학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Dietary supplementation of protease and organic acid in poultry by-product meal-based diet in broilers

  • Received : 2024.03.05
  • Accepted : 2024.06.18
  • Published : 2024.12.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective: This study investigated the impact of supplementation of protease and organic acid on growth performance and other biological parameters in broilers fed poultry by-product meal (PBM) based diet. Methods: Five hundred 1-day-old broiler chicks (Ross 308) were distributed into five treatments with 5 replicates, each pen having 20 birds, and fed each group one of five isocaloric and isonitrogenous diets in two phases: stater phase (1 to 21 days) metabolizable energy (ME) 3000 kcal/kg; crude protein (CP) 22%, and a finisher phase (22 to 35 days) ME 3,200 kcal/kg; CP 19.5%. The dietary treatments were: i) standard broiler ration (Cont); ii) The control diet with 25% of the soybean meal replaced by PBM on an equivalent protein basis (PBM); iii) PBM diet supplemented with 0.5 g/kg of protease (PBMP); iv) PBM diet supplemented with 1 g/kg organic acid (PBMO); and v) PBM diet addition with 0.5 g/kg protease and 1 g/kg organic acid (PBMPO). Results: The overall data showed that feed conversion ratio was improved (p<0.05) in the PBMP group. Apparent CP digestibility was higher (p<0.05) in both Cont and PBMP groups. Jejunal villus height increased (p<0.05) in PBMP and PBMPO groups, while only the PBMO group exhibited a higher (p<0.05) crypt depth. Lipase activity was increased (p<0.05) in the PBMP, PBMO, and PBMPO dietary treatments. However, trypsin activity showed a significant increase (p<0.05) in the PBMP and PBMO groups. Serum biochemistry increased (p<0.05) globulin and total protein levels in the PBMP group. Conclusion: PBM could partially replace the soybean meal with supplementation of either protease or organic acid in broiler diets without impairing overall growth performance. Furthermore, careful optimization must be considered when combining protease and organic acids.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Dr. Shahzad Ashraf from Ghazi Brothers Pvt. Ltd., Lahore, Pakistan, was acknowledge for providing the product for this experimental trial.

References

  1. Raza A, Bashir S, Tabassum R. An update on carbohydrases: growth performance and intestinal health of poultry. Heliyon 2019;5:e01437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01437 
  2. Parisi G, Tulli F, Fortina R, et al. Protein hunger of the feed sector: the alternatives offered by the plant world. Ital J Anim Sci 2020;19:1204-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2020.1827993 
  3. Sauvant D, Perez JM, Tran G, Ponter A. Tables of composition and nutritional value of feed materials. In: Sauvant D, Perez JM, Tran G, editors. Wageningen, Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers; 2004. https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-668-7 
  4. Parrini S, Aquilani C, Pugliese C, Bozzi R, Sirtori F. Soybean replacement by alternative protein sources in pig nutrition and its effect on meat quality. Animals 2023;13:494. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13030494 
  5. Aimiuwu OC, Lilburn MS. Protein quality of poultry byproduct meal manufactured from whole fowl co-extruded with corn or wheat. Poult Sci 2006;85:1193-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/85.7.1193 
  6. Rostagno HS, Albino LF, Donzele JL, et al. Brazilian tables for poultry and swine: composition of feedstuffs and nutritional requirements. 3rd ed. Vicosa, MG, Brazil: Departamento de Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Vicosa; 2011. 
  7. Ruzic-Muslic D, Petrovic MP, Petrovic MM, et al. Protein source in diets for ruminant nutrition. Biotechnol Anim Husb 2014;30:175-84. https://doi.org/10.2298/BAH1402175R 
  8. Hassanabadi A, Amanloo H, Zamanian M. Effects of substitution of soybean meal with poultry by-product meal on broiler chickens performance. J Anim Vet Adv 2008;7:303-7. 
  9. Hosseinzadeh MH, Ebrahimnezhad Y, Janmohammadi H, Ahmadzadeh AR, Sarikhan M. Poultry byproduct meal: influence on performance and egg quality traits of layers. Int J Agric Biol 2010;12:547-50. 
  10. Bhargava KK, O'Neil JB. Composition and utilization of poultry by-product and hydrolyzed feather meal in broiler diets. Poult Sci 1975;54:1511-8. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0541511 
  11. Jafari M, Ebrahimnezhad Y, Janmohammadi H, Nazeradl K, Nemati M. Evaluation of protein and energy quality of poultry by-product meal using poultry assays. Afr J Agric Res 2011;6:1407-12. 
  12. Wang JJ, Garlich JD, Shih JCH. Beneficial effects of versazyme, a keratinase feed additive, on body weight, feed conversion, and breast yield of broiler chickens. J Appl Poult Res 2006;15:544-50. https://doi.org/10.1093/japr/15.4.544 
  13. Fru-Nji F, Kluenter AM, Fischer M, Pontoppidan K. A feed serine protease improves broiler performance and increases protein and energy digestibility. J Poult Sci 2011;48:239-46. https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.011035 
  14. Jabbar A, Tahir M, Khan RU, Ahmad N. Interactive effect of exogenous protease enzyme and dietary crude protein levels on growth and digestibility indices in broiler chickens during the starter phase. Trop Anim Health Prod 2020;53:23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-020-02466-5 
  15. Kamel NF, Naela, Ragaa M, El-Banna RA, Mohamed FF. Effects of a monocomponent protease on performance parameters and protein digestibility in broiler chickens. Agric Agric Sci Procedia 2015;6:216-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaspro.2015.08.062 
  16. Dibner JJ, Buttin P. Use of organic acids as a model to study the impact of gut microflora on nutrition and metabolism. J Appl Poult Res 2002;11:453-63. https://doi.org/10.1093/japr/11.4.453 
  17. Adil S, Banday T, Bhat GA, Mir MS, Rehman M. Effect of dietary supplementation of organic acids on performance, intestinal histomorphology, and serum biochemistry of broiler chicken. Vet Med Int 2010;2010:479485. https://doi.org/10.4061/2010/479485 
  18. Hassan HMA, Mohamed MA, Youssef AW, Hassan ER. Effect of using organic acids to substitute antibiotic growth promoters on performance and intestinal microflora of broilers. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2010;23:1348-53. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2010.10085 
  19. Mohamed MA, El-Daly EF, Abd El-Azeem NA, Youssef AW, Hassan HMA. Growth performance and histological changes in ileum and immune related organs of broilers fed organic acids or antibiotic growth promoter. Int J Poult Sci 2014;13:602-10. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2014.602.610 
  20. Arshad MA, Bhatti SA, Hassan I, Rahman MA, Rehman MS. Effects of bile acids and lipase supplementation in low-energy diets on growth performance, fat digestibility and meat quality in broiler chickens. Braz J Poult Sci 2020;22:1-8. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2020-1258 
  21. AOAC, BAM. Association of official analytical chemists. Official methods of analysis. 12th ed. Washington, DC, USA: AOAC; 1990. 
  22. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 1951;193:265-75. 
  23. Xu ZR, Hu CH, Xia MS, Zhan XA, Wang MQ. Effects of dietary fructooligosaccharide on digestive enzyme activities, intestinal microflora and morphology of male broilers. Poult Sci 2003;82:1030-6. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/82.6.1030 
  24. Gwak MG, Park HS, Kim BK, Park HB, Kim JH. Effects of feeding enzyme-hydrolyzed poultry by-product meal on productivity and blood biochemical characteristics in broilers. Korean J Poult Sci 2021;48:133-42. https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2021.48.3.133 
  25. Sahraei M, Lotfollahian H, Ghanbari A. Effect of poultry by product meal on performance parameters, serum uric acid concentration and carcass characteristics. Iran J Appl Anim Sci 2012;2:73-7. 
  26. Mahmood T, Mirza MA, Nawaz H, Shahid M, Athar M, Hussain M. Effect of supplementing exogenous protease in low protein poultry by-product meal based diets on growth performance and nutrient digestibility in broilers. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2017;228:23-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2017.01.012 
  27. Elkin RG. Nutritional components of feedstuffs: a qualitative chemical appraisal of protein. In: McNab JM, Boorman KN, editors. Poultry feedstuffs: supply, composition and nutritive value. Wallingford, UK: CABI publishing; 2002. pp. 57-86. https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851994642.0057 
  28. Xu KL, Gong GX, Liu M, et al. Keratinase improves the growth performance, meat quality and redox status of broiler chickens fed a diet containing feather meal. Poult Sci 2022;101:101913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2022.101913 
  29. Freitas DM, Vieira SL, Angel CR, Favero A, Maiorka A. Performance and nutrient utilization of broilers fed diets supplemented with a novel mono-component protease. J Appl Poult Res 2011;20:322-34. https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2010-00295 
  30. Emami NK, Samie A, Rahmani HR, Ruiz-Feria CA. The effect of peppermint essential oil and fructooligosaccharides, as alternatives to virginiamycin, on growth performance, digestibility, gut morphology and immune response of male broilers. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2012;175:57-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2012.04.001 
  31. Yaqoob MU, Yousaf M, Imran S, et al. Effect of partially replacing soybean meal with sunflower meal with supplementation of multienzymes on growth performance, carcass characteristics, meat quality, ileal digestibility, digestive enzyme activity and caecal microbiota in broilers. Anim Biosci 2022;35:1575-84. https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.21.0553 
  32. Cenesiz AA, Yavas I, Ciftci I, Ceylan N, Taskesen HO. Guanidinoacetic acid supplementation is favourable to broiler diets even containing poultry by-product meal. Br Poult Sci 2020;61:311-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2020.1720909 
  33. Saleh AA, Dawood MM, Badawi NA, Ebeid TA, Amber KA, Azzam MM. Effect of supplemental serine-protease from Bacillus licheniformis on growth performance and physiological change of broiler chickens. J Appl Anim Res 2020;48:86-92. https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2020.1732986 
  34. Hafeez A, Shah SAA, Khan RU, Ullah Q, Naz S. Effect of diet supplemented with phytogenics and protease enzyme on performance, serum biochemistry and muscle histomorphology in broilers. J Appl Anim Res 2020;48:326-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2020.1789648