한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육 (Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education)

  • 제43권4호
  • /
  • Pages.476-492
  • /
  • 2024
  • /
  • 1598-3099(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2733-8436(eISSN)
한국초등과학교육학회 (The Korean Elementary Science Education Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

예비 교사의 과학 교수-학습 역량 지표 요인 검증과 모의 수업 실연이 역량에 미치는 효과

Validation of Indicators for Science Teaching-Learning Competency of Pre-service Teachers and the Effect of Simulated Teaching

  • 투고 : 2024.07.26
  • 심사 : 2024.08.23
  • 발행 : 2024.10.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

이 연구는 예비 교사들의 과학 교수-학습 역량을 측정하기 위한 지표의 요인 구조를 검증하고, 모의 수업 실연이 예비 교사들의 과학 교수-학습 역량에 미치는 효과를 분석하고자 하였다. 연구 대상으로는 과학 교수-학습 역량 지표의 요인 구조 검증에 175명의 예비 교사들의 응답 데이터를 활용하였으며, 모의 수업 실연에 따른 과학 교수-학습 역량에 미치는 효과에는 3개 학과 73명이 응답한 데이터를 활용하였다. 과학 교수-학습 역량의 요인 구조 검증을 위한 분석은 현장 초등교사 5인의 내용 타당도 지수 산출과 사교회전(프로맥스)을 활용한 주축 요인 분석 및 신뢰도 분석을 실시하였다. 그리고 모의 수업 실연에 따른 과학 교수-학습 역량 비교는 대응 표본 t-test를 통해 분석하였다. 연구 결과는 다음과 같다. 과학 교수-학습 역량 지표는 5요인 30문항으로 수정·보완하였으며 내용 타당도 지수는 .94로 분석되었고, 탐색적 요인 분석에서는 30개 문항이 모두 의도한 요인에 적재된 것을 확인할 수 있었으며, 지표의 신뢰도는 .953 (.829~.918)로 분석되었다. 대응 표본 t-test 결과에서는 모의 수업 전과 후 예비 교사들의 과학 교수-학습 역량에는 유의미한 향상이 나타났다. 이 연구를 통해 모의 수업 실연이 예비 교사들의 과학 교수-학습 역량에 미치는 유의미한 효과를 검증할 수 있었으며, 예비 교사 교육과정에서 학교 수업 현장성 반영을 위해 앞으로도 모의 수업 실연이 이루어질 필요성이 제기된다. 또한 교수-학습 역량 측정과 관련하여 자기 보고식 척도 외에 타자 평가용 척도의 개발 필요성도 제안한다.

This study validated the factor structure of the indicators for measuring pre-service teachers' science teaching-learning competency and analyzed the effects of simulated teaching practice on these competencies. Furthermore, it used response data from 175 pre-service teachers to verify the factor structure of the science teaching-learning competency indicators, and the data from 73 respondents from three departments to examine the effects of simulated teaching practice. To analyze the factor structure of science teaching-learning competency, the content validity index was calculated by five elementary school teachers, and the principal axis factoring with the Promax rotation and reliability analysis were conducted. Moreover, using, a paired sample t-test, the comparison of science teaching-learning competencies before and after simulated teaching practice was analyzed. The study results are as follows. The science teaching-learning competency indicators were revised and supplemented by 30 items under five factors, with a content validity index of .94. The exploratory factor analysis confirmed that 30 items were loaded onto the intended factors, and the reliability of the indicators was found to be .953 (in the sub-factor .829-.918). The paired sample t-test results revealed significant improvement in the pre-service teachers' science teaching-learning competencies before and after the simulated teaching practice. Furthermore, this study verified the significant effect of the simulated teaching practice on the pre-service teachers' science teaching-learning competencies and explained the need for continued implementation of the simulated teaching practice to reflect the specifics of school teaching in the pre-service teacher education curriculum. Moreover, it suggests the necessity of developing evaluation scales for the observer-rated scale, in addition to the self-report scales, to measure the teaching-learning competencies.

키워드

과제정보

이 논문은 2024년도 대구교육대학교 학술연구비 지원에 의하여 연구되었음.

참고문헌

  1. Bae, H., Lee, S., Choi, J., Koo, J., & Lee, S. (2024). A new educational approach to citizenship in school emphasizing neutrality in public education. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation research report CRC 2024-1. 
  2. Borphy, J., & Good, T. L. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. Wittrock(Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching, 328-375. New York: Macmillan. 
  3. Cho, D., Kwak, D., & Lee, J. (2007). Reflective teacher education: practice and theory. Seoul: Hakjisa. 
  4. Choi, J., Kim, K., Jang, S., Lee, K. (2008). A study on the core competency analysis of elementary school teachers. Seoul: Korean School Institute of Educational Curriculum and Evaluation.
  5. Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic press. 
  6. Fehring, R. J. (1987). Methods to validate nursing diagnoses. Heart and Lung, 16(6), 625-629. 
  7. Fraenkel, J., Wallen, N., & Hyun, H. (2023). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education 10th ed. McGraw-Hill Education. 
  8. Guerriero, S. (Ed.). (2017). Pedagogical knowledge and the changing nature of the teaching profession. Paris: OECD. 
  9. Guerriero, S., & Revai, N. (2017). Knowledge-based teaching and the evolution of a profession. In S. Guerriero, (Ed.). Pedagogical knowledge and the changing nature of the teaching profession (pp. 253-269). Paris: OECD. 
  10. Hetherington, L., Chappell, K., Ruck Keene, H., Wren, H., Cukurova, M., Hathaway, C., & Bogner, F. (2020). International educators' perspectives on the purpose of science education and the relationship between school science and creativity. Research in Science & Technological Education, 38(1), 19-41. 
  11. Hwang, E., & Baek, S. (2008). A Comparative Research on the Results between Self-reported Evaluation and Experts' Evaluation of Practical Teaching Competence in Secondary School. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 21(2), 53-74. 
  12. IBSTPI(revised Ed.) (2004). Instructor competency: the standards, Batavia. IL: International Board of Standards for Training Performance and Instruction.
  13. Jeong, H., & Hong, E. (2024). A Qualitative Case Study on the Process of Beginning Elementary Teachers'View on Teaching, The Journal of Elementary Education, 37(2), 217-240. 
  14. Jin, S. & Rha, I. (2009). A Framework of Teaching Competencies and Comparison of the Perception: between Pre-service and In-service Elementary School Teachers in Korea. The Journal of Elementary Education, 22(1), 343-368. 
  15. Kim, D., & Sohn, W. (2020). The Student Evaluations of Instruction Quality Scale(SEIQs): Construction and Validation for Primary Education. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 33(3), 577-602. 
  16. Kim, G., Kim, J., Kim, D., Kim, Y., Nam, S., & Lee, E. (2009). Analysis of the current status of teacher training curriculum: Focusing on the curriculum experienced. Seoul: Korea Educational Development Institute. 
  17. Kim, H. (2013). Development of creative teaching ability test tool for early childhood teachers for the improvement of kindergarten classroom teaching. The Journal of Korea Open Association for Early Childhood Education, 18(4), 377-396. 
  18. Kim, H., & Ha, S. (2023). Exploring the Impact of Open Inquiry and Simulation Laboratory Teaching Experiences on the Perception of Pre-service Physics Teachers. New Physics: Sae Mulli, 73(4), 350-361. 
  19. Kim, H., Kim, M., Lee, D., Lee, M., & Lim Y. (2023). The Exploration of Direction for Curriculum Innovation in Preparation for the Intelligence Information Society. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation research report RRC 2023-3. 
  20. Kim, J., & Lee, G. (2005). Logical Investigation on the Teachers' Self-Evaluation Strategy of Instructional Competence for Improving Quality of Instruction. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 18(3), 19-38. 
  21. Kim, M. (2003). A study on the introduction of a certification system for classroom skills. Seoul: Ministry of Education and Human Resources Development. 
  22. Kim, M., & Cho, H. (2017). The Structural Equation Modeling of the Relationship among Achievement Goal Orientation, Emotions, Class Participation and Quality of Instruction of Elementary School Teachers. The Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 31(1), 163-193. 
  23. Kim, S., Hong, S., & Jeong, Y. (2017). The Exploration of Problems and Improvement of Elementary Teacher Employment Examination : Focused on 'K' Office of Education's Improvement on the Second-round Examination. Educational Culture Research, 23(2), 259-284. 
  24. Kim, Y., & Lee, J. (2019). A Study on validation of the evaluation scale for teaching competencies of early childhood teachers. The Journal of Korea Open Association for Early Childhood Education, 24(3), 169-195. 
  25. Klieme, E., Pauli, C., & Reusser, K. (2009). The Pythagoras study: Investigating effects of teaching and learning in Swiss and German classrooms. In T. Janik, & T. Seidel (Eds.), The power of video studies in investigating teaching and learning in the classroom. Munster, Germany: Waxmann. 
  26. Lee, D., & Kim, S. (2012). The Development and Validation of the Evaluation Indicators for Teaching Competency of Elementary Teachers. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 25(4), 581-604. 
  27. Lee, H. (2023). Enhancing Science Self-efficacy and Science Intrinsic Motivation through Simulated Teaching-learning for Pre-service Teachers. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 42(4), 560-576. 
  28. Lee, H., Jeon, J., & Lee, H. (2018). Development of Framework and Rubric for Measuring Students' Level of Systems Thinking. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 38(3), 355-367. 
  29. Lee, H., Jeon, J., & Lee, H. (2019). Verification the Systems Thinking Factor Structure and Comparison of Systems Thinking Based on Preferred Subjects about Elementary School Students'. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 39(2), 161-171. 
  30. Lee, H., Park, B., Jeon, J., & Lee, H. (2024). Validation of the Revised Systems Thinking Measuring Instrument(Re_STMI) for High School Students. Brain, Digital, & Learning, 14(1), 1-19. 
  31. Lipowsky, F., Rakoczy, K., Pauli, C., Drollinger-Vetter, B., Klieme, E., & Reusser, K. (2009). Quality of geometry instruction and its short-term impact on students' understanding of the Pythagorean Theorem. Learning and Instruction, 19(6), 527-537. 
  32. Mezza, A. (2022). Reinforcing and innovating teacher professionalism: Learning form other professions. Paris: OECD. 
  33. Ministry of Education (MOE), & Korea Educational Development Institute(KEDI). (2024). Handbook for Competency Assessment of Teacher Training Institutions in 2024. Ministry of Education: Sejong. 
  34. MOE(Ministry of Education) (2022a). General overview of elementary, middle, and high school curriculum. Ministry of Education Notification No. 2022-33 [Supplementary Volume 1]. 
  35. MOE(Ministry of Education) (2022b). Announcement of confirmation of 2022 revised elementary, middle, and high school and special education curriculum - Ministry of Education press release (2022.12.22.) 
  36. Neumann, K., Kauertz, A., & Fischer, H. (2012). Quality of instruction in science education. Second international handbook of science education, 247-258. 
  37. OECD (2018). The future of education and skills: Education 2030. Paris: OECD. 
  38. OECD (2020). Back to the future of education: Four OECD scenarios for schooling. Educational Research and Innovation. Paris: OECD. 
  39. Oh, J., & Kim, S. (2024). Preservice Biology Teachers' Peer Evaluation on Simulated Instruction - Focused on Semantic Network Analysis -. Biology Education, 52(1), 102-113. 
  40. Park, M., & Sohn, W. (2016). Validation of the Korean Version of Assessment For Learning Questionnaire (AFL-Q). Journal of Educational Evaluation, 29(1), 101-121. 
  41. Park, S., Kim, G., Kim, B., Kim, E., Joo, Y., Joo, H., Jeon, J., & Hwang, J. (2023). Basic research to promote teacher training program advancement support project. Chungbuk: Korea Educational Development Institute. 
  42. Park, S., Kim, G., Kim, J., Sang, K., Yu, E., Jeong, Y., & Cho, B. (2023). Research on development of minimum achievement standards according to the 2022 revised curriculum(I). Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation research report CRI 2023-7. 
  43. Rickards, F., Hattie, J., & Reid, C. (2021). The turning point for the teaching profession: Growing expertise and evaluative thinking. New York: Routledge.
  44. Rust, J., & Golombok, S. (2014). Modern psychometrics: The science of psychological assessment. Routledge.
  45. Scriven, M. (1998). Duty-based teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1(4), 319-334. 
  46. Seo, B., & Park, J. (2013). Development of Evaluation Scale for the Inclusive Instruction in Preschool. Korean Journal of Early Childhood Special Education, 13(3), 271-303. 
  47. Song, J. (2010). Statistical analysis methods required for writing SPSS/AMOS. Seoul; 21st century. 
  48. Sotiriou, S. A., & Bogner, F. X. (2020). education sciences How Creativity in STEAM Modules Intervenes with Self-E fficacy and Motivation. 
  49. Taut, S., & Rakoczy, K. (2016). Observing instructional quality in the context of school evaluation. Learning and Instruction, 46, 45-60. 
  50. Tigelaar, D., Dolmans, D., Wolfhagen, I., & Van der Vleuten, C. (2004). The development and validation of a framework for teaching competencies in higher education. Higher Education, 48(2), 253-268. 
  51. Ulferts, H. (Ed.). (2021). Teaching as a knowledge profession: Studying pedagogical knowledge across education systems. Paris: OECD. 
  52. Voss, T., Kunter, M., & Baumert, J. (2011). Assessing teacher candidates' general pedagogical/psychological knowledge: Test construction and validation, Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(4), 952-969. 
  53. Yang, E. (2010). Development of a diagnostic inventory for teaching competency. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Ewha Women University, Seoul, Korea.