DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Sensitivity analysis of self-centering rocking steel braced frames to far-field and near-field earthquakes

  • Masoomeh Naraghi (Department of Civil Engineering, Arak Branch, Islamic Azad University) ;
  • S. Mohammad Mirhosseini (Department of Civil Engineering, Arak Branch, Islamic Azad University) ;
  • Hossein Rahami (School of Engineering Science, College of Engineering, University of Tehran) ;
  • Abdolreza S. Moghadam (International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology)
  • Received : 2024.05.12
  • Accepted : 2024.09.18
  • Published : 2024.10.25

Abstract

Identifying the location of earthquake-induced damage in buildings and mitigating its impact, especially in low-damage systems such as rocking frames, is a significant challenge for structural engineers. Therefore, it is crucial to investigate the sensitivity and type of damage of buildings exposed to severe earthquakes to concentrate damage in predefined locations that can be repaired easily. This paper explores the seismic responses of a Self-Centering Rocking Steel Braced Frame (SCR-SBF) under far-field and near-field ground motions. This earthquake-resistant system includes components such as post-tensioning cables to provide frame self-centering, eliminate residual drift in the system, and replaceable fuses to concentrate the earthquake-induced damage. While previous studies have examined far and near-field earthquakes, their comparative influence on the seismic behavior of structures with a rocking system remains unexplored. This paper presents a novel investigation into the sensitivity of SCR-SBF structures to far and near-field earthquakes. Considering the critical effects of shock and impulse loads on rocking systems, the study aims to assess the effects of near-field earthquakes and compare them to far-field earthquakes on these systems. For this purpose, different response parameters have been calculated under records of far- and near-field earthquakes at three specific ground acceleration levels by incremental nonlinear dynamic analysis. Additionally, the seismic behavior of the SCR-SBF and Steel-Braced Frame (SBF) are compared for near and far-field ground motions. The results show that SCR-SBF systems have better resilience and reduced local failures compared to SBF systems under far and near-field earthquakes, requiring tailored design strategies.

Keywords

References

  1. ANSI/AISC 360-16 (2016), Specification for Structural Steel Buildings, American Institute of Steel Construction; Chicago, Illinois, USA. 
  2. ASCE/SEI 7-22 (2022), Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures, American Society of Civil Engineers; Reston, USA. 
  3. Clough, R.W. and Huckelbridge, A.A. (1977), "Preliminary experimental study of seismic uplift of a steel frame", Report No. UCB/EERC77-22, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, California. 
  4. Deierlein, G., Krawinkler, H., Ma, X., Eatherton, M., Hajjar, J., Takeuchi, T., Kasai, K. and Midorikawa, M. (2011), "Earthquake resilient steel braced frames with controlled rocking and energy dissipating fuses", Steel Construct., 4(3), 171-175. https://doi.org/10.1002/stco.201110023. 
  5. Di sarno, L. and Elnashai, A.S. (2009), "Bracing systems for seismic retrofitting of steel frames", J. Construct. Steel Res., 65(2), 452-465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2008.02.013. 
  6. Dyanati, M., Huang, Q. and Roke, D. (2015), "Seismic demand models and performance evaluation of self-centering and conventional concentrically braced frames", Eng. Struct., 84, 368-381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.11.036. 
  7. Eatherton, M.R., Hajjar, J.F., Deierlein, G., Krawinkler, H., Billington, S. and Ma, X. (2008), "Controlled rocking of steel-framed buildings with replaceable energy-dissipating fuses", Proceedings of the 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China, October. 
  8. Eatherton, M.R. and Hajjar, J.F. (2014), "Hybrid simulation testing of a self-centering rocking steel braced frame system", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 43(11), 1725-1742. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2419. 
  9. Eatherton, M.R. and Hajjar, J.F. (2011), "Residual drifts of self-centering systems including effects of ambient building resistance", Earthq. Spectra., 27(3), 719-744. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.3605318. 
  10. FEMA-P695 (2009), Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors, Federal Emergency Management Agency, US Department of Homeland Security; Washington D.C, USA. 
  11. Froozanfar, M., Moradi, S., Kianoush, R., Speicher, M.S. and Di Sarno, L. (2024), "Review of self-centering rocking systems for earthquake-resistant building structures: State of the art", J. Build. Eng., 108607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.108607. 
  12. Gupta, A. and Krawinkler, H. (1999), "Seismic demands for performance evaluation of steel moment resisting frame structures", Technical Report Number 132, John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center. 
  13. Hall, K.S., Eatherton, M.R. and Hajjar, J.F. (2010), "Nonlinear behavior of controlled rocking steel-framed building systems with replaceable energy dissipating fuses", Report No. NSEL-026; Newmark Structural Engineering Laboratory, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA. 
  14. Housner, GW. (1963), "The behavior of inverted pendulum structures during earthquakes", Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 71(2), 403-417. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0530020403. 
  15. Hui, C., Zhou, Z., Li, Y., Jiao, Y. and Hai, R. (2023), "Quasi-static cyclic loading experiment and analysis of double-side slotted steel tube shear damper", Arch. Civil Mech. Eng., 23(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43452-022-00581-8. 
  16. Kelly, J. and Tsztoo, D. (1977), "Earthquake simulation testing of a stepping frame with energy-absorbing devices", Report No. EERC77-17; Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, California. 
  17. Ma, X., Eatherton, M., Hajjar, J.F., Krawinkler, H. and Deierlein, G. (2010), "Seismic design and behavior of steel frames with controlled rocking - part II: Large scale shake table testing and system collapse analysis", Proceedings of Structures Congress/North American Steel Construction Conference NASCC, Orlando, May. 
  18. McKenna, F., Fenves, G.L., Filippou, F.C. and Scott, M.H. (2016), "Open system for earthquake engineering simulation (OpenSees)", Berkeley: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California. 
  19. Midorikawa, M., Azuhata, T., Ishihara, T. and Wada, A. (2006), "Shaking table tests on seismic response of steel braced frames with column uplift", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 35(14), 1767-1785. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.603. 
  20. Midorikawa, M., Ishihara, T., Azuhata, T., Hori, H., Kusakari, T. and Asari, T. (2009), "Threedimensional shaking table tests on seismic response of reduced-scale steel rocking frames", Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Advances in Experimental Structural Engineering, San Francisco, October. 
  21. Moradi, S. and Burton, H.V. (2018), "Response surface analysis and optimization of controlled rocking steel braced frames", Bull. Earthq. Eng.,16(10), 4861-4892. 
  22. Ozaki, F., Kawai, Y., Kanno, R. and Hanya, K. (2013), "Damage-control systems using replaceable energy-dissipating steel fuses for cold-formed steel structures: Seismic behavior by shake table tests", J. Struct. Eng, 139(5), 787-795. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000638. 
  23. Pettinga, D., Christopoulos, C., Pampanin, S. and Priestley, N. (2007), "Effectiveness of simple approaches in mitigating residual deformations in buildings", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 36(12), 1763-1783. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.717. 
  24. Rahgozar, N. and Alam, M.S. (2023), "Seismic collapse assessment of hybrid self-centering piston-based braced frames equipped with SMA bars and friction springs", J. Construct. Steel Res., 208, 108003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2023.108003. 
  25. Roke, D. (2010), "Damage-free seismic resistant self-centering concentrically-braced frames", Ph.D. Dissertation, Lehigh University, Bethlehem. 
  26. Tremblay, R., Poirier, L.P., Bouaanani, N., Leclerc, M., Rene, V., Fronteddu, L. and Rivest, S. (2008), "Innovative viscously damped rocking braced steel frames", Proceedings of the 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China, October.
  27. Wang, F., Cui, Y., Chen, T. (2021), "Design concepts and seismic behavior of ductile linked rocking steel frames", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 146, 106757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106757. 
  28. Wiebe, L. and Christopoulos, C. (2009), "Mitigation of higher mode effects in base-rocking systems by using multiple rocking sections", J. Earthq. Eng., 13(sup1), 83-108. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460902813315. 
  29. Xue, J., Zhang, W., Luo, Z., Qi, L. and Yan, S. (2023), "Investigation on seismic damping effect of an innovative amplified viscously damped outrigger for super high-rise structures", Archiv. Civ. Mech. Eng., 23(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43452-022-00574-7. 
  30. Yang, X., Jia, M. and Lu, D. (2023), "Experimental and numerical research of the steel frames with replaceable column foot", J. Build. Eng., 64, 105670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105670.