DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

군수품 품질수준진단 프레임워크 설계

Design of Framework for Quality Level Diagnosis of Military Supplies

  • Yo Han Kang (Defense Agency for Technology and Quality) ;
  • Jin Young Choi (Department of Industrial Engineering, Ajou University)
  • 투고 : 2024.07.31
  • 심사 : 2024.08.29
  • 발행 : 2024.09.30

초록

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to propose a framework for quality level diagnosis of military supplies, which consists of 7 steps for developing questionnaires and suggesting improvement guidelines. Methods: We analyze the required functions of the equipment under investigation, classify the main components, review quality characteristics, develop a quality level checklist through the first and second stages of quality function deployment, and evaluate and analyze the results of the quality level survey applied to this checklist. Results: We first compared and analyzed case studies of domestic and international military and civilian quality level surveys and proposed a framework for diagnosing the quality levels of military supplies. Additionally, we applied the proposed quality level diagnosis framework to a specific weapon system to analyze its quality characteristics and identify improvement directions, thereby verifying the applicability of the proposed frame- work for diagnosing the quality levels of military supplies. Conclusion: The results of this study, which include the application of the proposed diagnostic framework for quality investigation and analysis, can be used to understand the satisfaction with the military supplies currently in operation. This will enable the continuous assurance of quality related to the functions and performance required by the military weapon systems.

키워드

과제정보

본 논문은 국방기술품질원 군수품 품질조사 방법론 연구로 수행되었음(Military Supplies Quality Survey Methodology. Defense Agency for Technology and Quality 2023).

참고문헌

  1. Choi, J. and Kim, M. 2023. DFMEA case study based on AIAG & VDA integrated FMEA process. Proceedings of the 2023 conference of the Korean Society of Automotive Engineers 661-665. 
  2. EQ(Excellent Quality) https://www.google.com/search?q=EQ%EC%9D%B8%EC%A6%9D&oq=EQ%EC%9D%B8%EC%A6%9D&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyBggAEEUYOTIKCAEQABiABBiiBDIKCAIQABiABBiiBDIKCAMQABiABBiiBDIGCAQQRRg8MgYIBRBFGDzSAQkzMDEyajBqMTWoAgiwAgE&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8. 
  3. Hyundai Motor group. http://winwin.hyundai.com/coportal/system/5star.html. 
  4. Instruction for National Defense Force Development. 2022. https://www.law.go.kr/admRuLsInfoP.do?admRulSeq=2100000108852.
  5. Kim, M.S. and Ahn, J.K. 1996. A study on the improvement in the Defence Quality System. Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management 24(1):110-125. 
  6. Kim, Y. 2022. A Suggestions for Integrated Acquisition Management System of National Defense Force Development. Strategic Studies 29(1):39-88. 
  7. Lee, C.H. et al. 2014. A Study on Vehicle Happy Index Using the JD Power. Proceedings of the 2014 fall conference of the Korean Society for Quality Management 431-432. 
  8. Lee, T.H et al. 2018. A Study on the Application of QFD Application Model for Target Performance and Cost Setting of The Weapon System. Journal of the Korean society for Quality Management 46(4):821-842. 
  9. Military Supplies Quality Survey Methodology. Defense Agency for Technology and Quality 2023. 
  10. Song, B.S. and Cho, J.R. 2008. Application of Industrial Reliability Technology to Nation Defense Field. Journal of Applied Reliability 8(2):61-73. 
  11. Tews, J. and Perryman, S. 2010. J. D. Power and Associates reports: Overall initial quality improves considerably, with gains shared across most manufacturers [Press release].