Korean Journal of Radiology

  • 제25권10호
  • /
  • Pages.902-912
  • /
  • 2024
  • /
  • 1229-6929(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-8330(eISSN)
대한영상의학회 (The Korean Society of Radiology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Biopsy With Needle Track Plugging in Patients With Focal Liver Lesions on an Outpatient Basis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

  • Ja Kyung Yoon (Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Choong-kun Lee (Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Hongjeong Yoon (Songdang Institute for Cancer Research, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Hye Jin Choi (Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Seung-seob Kim (Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2024.06.05
  • 심사 : 2024.08.02
  • 발행 : 2024.10.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objective: The increasing utilization of various molecular tests for diagnosing and selecting treatments for patients with malignancies has led to a rising trend in both the frequency of biopsies and the required tissue volume. We aimed to compare the safety of outpatient ultrasound (US)-guided percutaneous liver biopsy (PLB) between the coaxial method with needle track plugging (NTP) and the conventional method. Materials and Methods: This single-center, prospective, randomized controlled study was conducted from October 2022 to May 2023. Patients referred for US-guided PLB with target liver lesions measuring ≥1 cm and requiring ≥3 tissue cores were enrolled. Patients with severe coagulopathy or a substantial volume of ascites were excluded. Patients were randomly assigned to undergo PLB using either the coaxial method with NTP or the conventional method, in a 1:1 ratio, and were subsequently discharged after 2 hours. The primary endpoint was the presence of a patent track sign, defined as a linear color flow along the biopsy track on Doppler US, as an indication of bleeding. The secondary endpoints included clinically significant bleeding, delayed bleeding after discharge, and diagnostic yield. The incidences of these endpoints were compared between the two methods. Results: A total of 107 patients completed the study protocol. Patent track signs were observed significantly less frequently in the coaxial method with NTP group than in the conventional method group: 16.7% (9/54) vs. 35.8% (19/53; P = 0.042). Clinically significant bleeding and delayed bleeding did not occur in either group, and both methods achieved a high diagnostic yield: 94.4% (51/54) vs. 98.1% (52/53; P = 0.624). Conclusion: Compared with the conventional method, the coaxial method with NTP may potentially be safer, with a reduced risk of overall bleeding complications after PLB when retrieving ≥3 tissue cores. The coaxial method with NTP could be considered a viable option for acquiring multiple liver tissues on an outpatient basis.

키워드

과제정보

This study was funded by ENGAIN Co., Ltd.

참고문헌

  1. Jing H, Yi Z, He E, Xu R, Shi X, Li L, et al. Evaluation of risk factors for bleeding after ultrasound-guided liver biopsy. Int J Gen Med 2021;14:5563-5571
  2. Kim JW, Shin SS. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous core needle biopsy of abdominal viscera: tips to ensure safe and effective biopsy. Korean J Radiol 2017;18:309-322
  3. Potretzke TA, Saling LJ, Middleton WD, Robinson KA. Bleeding complications after percutaneous liver biopsy: do subcapsular lesions pose a higher risk? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2018;211:204-210
  4. Chi H, Hansen BE, Tang WY, Schouten JN, Sprengers D, Taimr P, et al. Multiple biopsy passes and the risk of complications of percutaneous liver biopsy. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017;29:36-41
  5. Neuberger J, Patel J, Caldwell H, Davies S, Hebditch V, Hollywood C, et al. Guidelines on the use of liver biopsy in clinical practice from the British Society of Gastroenterology, the Royal College of Radiologists and the Royal College of Pathology. Gut 2020;69:1382-1403
  6. Kitchin DR, Del Rio AM, Woods M, Ludeman L, Hinshaw JL. Percutaneous liver biopsy and revised coagulation guidelines: a 9-year experience. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2018;43:1494-1501
  7. Cui Z, Wright JD, Accordino MK, Buono D, Neugut AI, Hu JC, et al. Safety, utilization, and cost of image-guided percutaneous liver biopsy among cancer patients. Cancer Invest 2016;34:189-196
  8. Cao W, Cheng Z, Wang L, Zhao X, Li J, Zhou S. Analysis of risk factors of bleeding complications in percutaneous needle biopsy of liver occupying lesions. Int J Gen Med 2021;14:2893-2899
  9. Firpi RJ, Soldevila-Pico C, Abdelmalek MF, Morelli G, Judah J, Nelson DR. Short recovery time after percutaneous liver biopsy: should we change our current practices? Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005;3:926-929
  10. Minuk GY, Sutherland LR, Wiseman DA, MacDonald FR, Ding DL. Prospective study of the incidence of ultrasound-detected intrahepatic and subcapsular hematomas in patients randomized to 6 or 24 hours of bed rest after percutaneous liver biopsy. Gastroenterology 1987;92:290-293
  11. West J, Card TR. Reduced mortality rates following elective percutaneous liver biopsies. Gastroenterology 2010;139:1230-1237
  12. Howlett DC, Drinkwater KJ, Lawrence D, Barter S, Nicholson T. Findings of the UK national audit evaluating image-guided or image-assisted liver biopsy. Part II. Minor and major complications and procedure-related mortality. Radiology 2013;266:226-235
  13. Atwell TD, Smith RL, Hesley GK, Callstrom MR, Schleck CD, Harmsen WS, et al. Incidence of bleeding after 15,181 percutaneous biopsies and the role of aspirin. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;194:784-789
  14. Terjung B, Lemnitzer I, Dumoulin FL, Effenberger W, Brackmann HH, Sauerbruch T, et al. Bleeding complications after percutaneous liver biopsy: an analysis of risk factors. Digestion 2003;67:138-145
  15. Fotiadis N, De Paepe KN, Bonne L, Khan N, Riddell A, Turner N, et al. Comparison of a coaxial versus non-coaxial liver biopsy technique in an oncological setting: diagnostic yield, complications and seeding risk. Eur Radiol 2020;30:6702-6708
  16. Boyum JH, Atwell TD, Schmit GD, Poterucha JJ, Schleck CD, Harmsen WS, et al. Incidence and risk factors for adverse events related to image-guided liver biopsy. Mayo Clin Proc 2016;91:329-335
  17. Kim KW, Kim MJ, Kim HC, Park SH, Kim SY, Park MS, et al. Value of "patent track" sign on Doppler sonography after percutaneous liver biopsy in detection of postbiopsy bleeding: a prospective study in 352 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;189:109-116
  18. Rockey DC, Caldwell SH, Goodman ZD, Nelson RC, Smith AD. Liver biopsy. Hepatology 2009;49:1017-1044
  19. Longo JM, Bilbao JI, Barettino MD, Larrea JA, Pueyo J, Idoate F, et al. Percutaneous vascular and nonvascular puncture under US guidance: role of color Doppler imaging. Radiographics 1994;14:959-972
  20. Sheth RA, Baerlocher MO, Connolly BL, Dariushnia SR, Shyn PB, Vatsky S, et al. Society of interventional radiology quality improvement standards on percutaneous needle biopsy in adult and pediatric patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2020;31:1840-1848
  21. Dodd GD 3rd, Esola CC, Memel DS, Ghiatas AA, Chintapalli KN, Paulson EK, et al. Sonography: the undiscovered jewel of interventional radiology. Radiographics 1996;16:1271-1288
  22. Overman MJ, Modak J, Kopetz S, Murthy R, Yao JC, Hicks ME, et al. Use of research biopsies in clinical trials: are risks and benefits adequately discussed? J Clin Oncol 2013;31:17-22
  23. Cherukuri AR, Lubner MG, Zea R, Hinshaw JL, Lubner SJ, Matkowskyj KA, et al. Tissue sampling in the era of precision medicine: comparison of percutaneous biopsies performed for clinical trials or tumor genomics versus routine clinical care. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2019;44:2074-2080
  24. Hatfield MK, Beres RA, Sane SS, Zaleski GX. Percutaneous imaging-guided solid organ core needle biopsy: coaxial versus noncoaxial method. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;190:413-417
  25. Riley SA, Irving HC, Axon ATR, Ellis WR, Lintott DJ, Losowsky MS. Percutaneous liver biopsy with plugging of needle track: a safe method for use in patients with impaired coagulation. Lancet 1984;324:436
  26. Tobin MV, Gilmore IT. Plugged liver biopsy in patients with impaired coagulation. Dig Dis Sci 1989;34:13-15
  27. Smith TP, McDermott VG, Ayoub DM, Suhocki PV, Stackhouse DJ. Percutaneous transhepatic liver biopsy with tract embolization. Radiology 1996;198:769-774
  28. Fandrich CA, Davies RP, Hall PM. Small gauge gelfoam plug liver biopsy in high risk patients: safety and diagnostic value. Australas Radiol 1996;40:230-234
  29. Zins M, Vilgrain V, Gayno S, Rolland Y, Arrive L, Denninger MH, et al. US-guided percutaneous liver biopsy with plugging of the needle track: a prospective study in 72 high-risk patients. Radiology 1992;184:841-843
  30. Crummy AB, McDermott JC, Wojtowycz M. A technique for embolization of biopsy tracts. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1989;153:67-68
  31. Kamphuisen PW, Wiersma TG, Mulder CJ, de Vries RA. Plugged-percutaneous liver biopsy in patients with impaired coagulation and ascites. Pathophysiol Haemost Thromb 2002;32:190-193
  32. Kim SJ, Won JH, Kim YB, Wang HJ, Kim BW, Kim H, et al. Plugged percutaneous biopsy of the liver in living-donor liver transplantation recipients suspected to have graft rejection. Acta Radiol 2017;58:771-777
  33. Singhal S, M D P, Inuganti S, Botcha S, Deepashree DT, Uthappa MC. Percutaneous ultrasound-guided plugged liver biopsy - a single-centre experience. Pol J Radiol 2021;86:e239-e245
  34. Patel IJ, Rahim S, Davidson JC, Hanks SE, Tam AL, Walker TG, et al. Society of Interventional Radiology consensus guidelines for the periprocedural management of thrombotic and bleeding risk in patients Undergoing percutaneous image-guided interventions-part II: recommendations: endorsed by the Canadian Association for Interventional Radiology and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2019;30:1168-1184.e1
  35. Huang JY, Lu Q, Liu JB. Delayed hepatic rupture post ultrasound-guided percutaneous liver biopsy: a case report. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018;97:e9955
  36. Ren FY, Piao XX, Jin AL. Delayed hemorrhage from hepatic artery after ultrasound-guided percutaneous liver biopsy: a case report. World J Gastroenterol 2006;12:4273-4275
  37. Ahmed A, Samuels SL, Keeffe EB, Cheung RC. Delayed fatal hemorrhage from pseudoaneurysm of the hepatic artery after percutaneous liver biopsy. Am J Gastroenterol 2001;96:233-237
  38. Reichert CM, Weisenthal LM, Klein HG. Delayed hemorrhage after percutaneous liver biopsy. J Clin Gastroenterol 1983;5:263-266
  39. Caldwell SH, Hoffman M, Lisman T, Macik BG, Northup PG, Reddy KR, et al. Coagulation disorders and hemostasis in liver disease: pathophysiology and critical assessment of current management. Hepatology 2006;44:1039-1046
  40. Riddle C, Ahmed B, Doyle J, Connolly BL. Migration of Gelfoam to the gallbladder after liver biopsy. Pediatr Radiol 2008;38:806-809