DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of academic achievement, graduation competency and academic sustainability of veterinary students based on college admission processes

수의과대학 입학전형별 합격자의 학업성취도, 졸업역량, 학업지속비율 비교 연구

  • Sang-Soep Nahm (College of Veterinary Medicine, Konkuk University) ;
  • Yujin Kim (Dankook University College of Medicine) ;
  • Sungkwan Yang (College of Education, Konkuk University)
  • 남상섭 (건국대학교 수의과대학 수의학과) ;
  • 김유진 (단국대학교 의과대학 의예과) ;
  • 양성관 (건국대학교 사범대학 교직과)
  • Received : 2024.07.02
  • Accepted : 2024.08.07
  • Published : 2024.09.30

Abstract

A university's admission policy is established to select applicants who can successfully complete the curriculum. Thus, it is important to develop optimal admissions processes for applicant selection. This study was conducted to infer the most suitable admission processes for veterinary school applicants by examining academic achievement, graduation competency and academic sustainability. It was conducted on students admitted from 2009 to 2018 at one of the veterinary colleges in Korea. The admission methods were divided into, first the regular admission (RA) process, primarily reflecting the results of the College Scholastic Ability Test, and second, the rolling admission processes. The rolling processes were further divided into admission officer-based (AO), high school grade point average-based (GA), essay test-based (ET), admission for the underprivileged (UP) and admission for overseas Koreans and foreigners (OKF). The final grade point average was observed to be higher in the order of the GA, AO and RA groups. The survey on the veterinary graduation competency did not reveal any difference between the regular and rolling admission processes. However, among the latter, AO-based admission showed a higher ratio of outstanding competency levels. In terms of academic sustainability, OKF admission demonstrated a higher rate of failure while RA showed a higher rate of expulsion and dropout. Summarizing the above results, the most successful veterinary applicants were selected through AO-based admission. These results are meaningful in providing the basic information required to establish admission policies for veterinary colleges in Korea.

Keywords

References

  1. Huh MH, Jun SY. Predictive validity of admission indices. J Edu Res. 1996;34:299-309.
  2. An JH, Bae SA. A historical analysis of the university admissions officer system in Korea. J Edu Stud. 2009;40:1-30.
  3. Huh S. What is the best selection methods of medical freshmen and how to care the students after admission? Korean J Med Educ. 2013;25:185-187.
  4. Park J, Kang MG, Ryu SY, You JW, Moon KR. Predictors of failure in medical students. Korean J Med Educ. 2009;21:143-151.
  5. Yoon SD, Suh SJ, Park WH, Song JY. Analysis of recent failure rates in nationwide medical schools (1982-1986). Keimyung Univ Med J. 1989;8:212-222.
  6. Kim SH, Lee K, Hur Y, Kim JH. How medical students perform academically by admission types? Korean J Med Educ. 2013;25:201-209.
  7. Park J, Hwangbo Y. Depending on admission types, the comparison of GPAs, dropout rates, and passing rate of medical license examination. J Edu Eval. 2017;30:317-340.
  8. Park S, Lee S, Jung DW. The trends of research and analysis of each academic department grade point average based on university admission types. Adm Stud. 2018;6:99-124.
  9. Hong SH, Koo YJ, Kim TS. Life confidency and clinical performance confidency by university admission type: focusing on nursing students. Asia Pac J Multimed Serv Conv Art Hum Soc. 2017;7:583-590.
  10. Education Committee for Korean Association of Veterinary Medical Colleges; Korean Society for Veterinary Medical Education. Korean veterinary graduation competencies 2016. J Korean Vet Med Assoc. 2017;53:160-163.
  11. Kim HW, Ko HS, Lee MS, Nam JH, Kim WD, Lee JD. The influence of admission characteristics on premedical school achievement at a medical school. J Med Educ. 2002;14:257-268.
  12. Han ER, Chung EK, Oh SA, Chay KO, Woo YJ. Medical students' failure experiences and their related factors. Korean J Med Educ. 2012;24:233-240.