Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine

  • 제24권5호
  • /
  • Pages.319-328
  • /
  • 2024
  • /
  • 2383-9309(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2383-9317(eISSN)
대한치과마취과학회 (The Korean Dental Society of Anesthsiology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Retrospective comparison of articaine buccal infiltration and lidocaine intraosseous anesthesia in carious mandibular molars

  • Damin Park (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Bokyung Shin (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Ji-Young Yoon (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital)
  • 투고 : 2024.07.12
  • 심사 : 2024.09.10
  • 발행 : 2024.10.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Background: It is vital to identify more efficient anesthesia techniques for the restorative or endodontic treatment of mandibular molars. Both articaine buccal infiltration anesthesia (ABI) and lidocaine inferior alveolar nerve block anesthesia (LIANB) may not provide profound anesthesia, necessitating supplementary anesthesia. This study aimed to investigate whether lidocaine intraosseous lidocaine intraosseous anesthesia (LIO) is more suitable than ABI as primary anesthesia for caries treatment of mandibular molars. Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed patients treated for advanced caries according to the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) 5 and 6. The study involved 48 patients, split evenly between those receiving ABI and LIO, and examined the anesthesia success rate, pain during anesthesia, onset time, duration, and post-anesthesia lower lip numbness using Chi-square and Independent T-tests. Results: In the ABI group, 17 patients (70.8%) did not require additional anesthesia, whereas all 24 patients (100%) in the LIO group did not require additional anesthesia (P < 0.001). ABI was associated with significantly higher pain during anesthesia, slower onset time, and longer duration of anesthesia than LIO. There was no significant difference in post-anesthesia lower lip numbness between the two methods. Conclusion: Intraosseous anesthesia using lidocaine is more effective for treating severe caries in the mandibular molars because of its higher success rate, decreased pain during anesthesia, faster onset, and shorter recovery time.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Palti DG, Almeida CM, Rodrigues Ade C, Andreo JC, Lima JE. Anesthetic technique for inferior alveolar nerve block: a new approach. J Appl Oral Sci 2011; 19: 11-5.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572011000100004
  2. Ismail AI, Sohn W, Tellez M, Amaya A, Sen A, Hasson H, et al. The international caries detection and assessment system (ICDAS): an integrated system for measuring dental caries. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2007; 35: 170-8.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.2007.00347.x
  3. Gugnani N, Pandit IK, Srivastava N, Gupta M, Sharma M. International caries detection and assessment system (ICDAS): a new concept. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2011; 4: 93-100.  https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1089
  4. Huh YK, Montagnese TA, Harding J, Aminoshariae A, Mickel A. Assessment of patients' awareness and factors influencing patients' demands for sedation in endodontics. J Endod 2015; 41: 182-9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.10.009
  5. Parirokh M, Abbott PV. Present status and future directions-mechanisms and management of local anaesthetic failures. Int Endod J 2022; 55: 951-94.  https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13697
  6. Cohen HP, Cha BY, Spangberg LS. Endodontic anesthesia in mandibular molars: a clinical study. J Endod 1993; 19: 370-3.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81366-X
  7. Drum M, Reader A, Nusstein J, Fowler S. Successful pulpal anesthesia for symptomatic irreversible pulpitis. J Am Dent Assoc 2017; 148: 267-71.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2017.01.002
  8. Monteiro MR, Groppo FC, Haiter-Neto F, Volpato MC, Almeida JF. 4% articaine buccal infiltration versus 2% lidocaine inferior alveolar nerve block for emergency root canal treatment in mandibular molars with irreversible pulpits: a randomized clinical study. Int Endod J 2015; 48: 145-52.  https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12293
  9. Ali MA, Akter K, Molla MTIH, Kabir R. 4% articaine buccal infiltration versus 2% lignocaine inferior alveolar nerve block for pulpal anaesthesia in mandibular first molars. Eur J Dent Oral Health 2023; 4: 1-5. 
  10. Jung IY, Kim JH, Kim ES, Lee CY, Lee SJ. An evaluation of buccal infiltrations and inferior alveolar nerve blocks in pulpal anesthesia for mandibular first molars. J Endod 2008; 34: 11-3.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2007.09.006
  11. Meechan JG. Supplementary routes to local anaesthesia. Int Endod J 2002; 35: 885-96.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2002.00592.x
  12. Remmers T, Glickman G, Spears R, He J. The efficacy of intraflow intraosseous injection as a primary anesthesia technique. J Endod 2008; 34: 280-3.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2007.12.005
  13. Nilius M, Mueller C, Nilius MH, Haim D, Leonhardt H, Lauer G. Intraosseous anesthesia in symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: impact of bone thickness on perception and duration of pain. J Dent Anesth Pain Med 2020; 20: 367-75.  https://doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2020.20.6.367
  14. Smail-Faugeron V, Muller-Bolla M, Sixou JL, Courson F. Evaluation of intraosseous computerized injection system (QuicksleeperTM) vs conventional infiltration anaesthesia in paediatric oral health care: a multicentre, single-blind, combined split-mouth and parallel-arm randomized controlled trial. Int J Paediatr Dent 2019; 29: 573-84.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.12494
  15. Sovatdy S, Vorakulpipat C, Kiattavorncharoen S, Saengsirinavin C, Wongsirichat N. Inferior alveolar nerve block by intraosseous injection with QuicksleeperⓇ at the retromolar area in mandibular third molar surgery. J Dent Anesth Pain Med 2018; 18: 339-47.  https://doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2018.18.6.339
  16. Smail-Faugeron V, Muller-Bolla M, Sixou JL, Courson F. Split-mouth and parallel-arm trials to compare pain with intraosseous anaesthesia delivered by the computerised Quicksleeper system and conventional infiltration anaesthesia in paediatric oral healthcare: protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2015; 5: e007724. 
  17. Replogle K, Reader A, Nist R, Beck M, Weaver J, Meyers WJ. Anesthetic efficacy of the intraosseous injection of 2% lidocaine (1:100,000 epinephrine) and 3% mepivacaine in mandibular first molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997; 83: 30-7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(97)90087-1
  18. Nusstein J, Reader A, Nist R, Beck M, Meyers WJ. Anesthetic efficacy of the supplemental intraosseous injection of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine in irreversible pulpitis. J Endod 1998; 24: 487-91.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(98)80053-8
  19. Coggins R, Reader A, Nist R, Beck M, Meyers WJ. Anesthetic efficacy of the intraosseous injection in maxillary and mandibular teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1996; 81: 634-41.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(96)80067-9
  20. Corbett IP, Kanaa MD, Whitworth JM, Meechan JG. Articaine infiltration for anesthesia of mandibular first molars. J Endod 2008; 34: 514-8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.02.042
  21. Kanaa MD, Whitworth JM, Corbett IP, Meechan JG. Articaine and lidocaine mandibular buccal infiltration anesthesia: a prospective randomized double-blind cross-over study. J Endod 2006; 32: 296-8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2005.09.016
  22. Robertson D, Nusstein J, Reader A, Beck M, McCartney M. The anesthetic efficacy of articaine in buccal infiltration of mandibular posterior teeth. J Am Dent Assoc 2007; 138: 1104-12.  https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2007.0324
  23. Aggarwal V, Singla M, Miglani S, Kohli S, Irfan M. A prospective, randomized single-blind evaluation of effect of injection speed on anesthetic efficacy of inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis. J Endod 2012; 38: 1578-80.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.08.006
  24. Whitworth JM, Kanaa MD, Corbett IP, Meechan JG. Influence of injection speed on the effectiveness of incisive/mental nerve block: a randomized, controlled, double-blind study in adult volunteers. J Endod 2007; 33: 1149-54.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2007.07.016
  25. Vongsavan K, Samdrup T, Kijsamanmith K, Rirattanapong P, Vongsavan N. The effect of intraosseous local anesthesia of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine on pulpal blood flow and pulpal anesthesia of mandibular molars and canines. Clin Oral Investig 2019; 23: 673-80.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2481-3
  26. Nydegger B, Nusstein J, Reader A, Drum M, Beck M. Anesthetic comparisons of 4% concentrations of articaine, lidocaine, and prilocaine as primary buccal infiltrations of the mandibular first molar: a prospective randomized, double-blind study. J Endod 2014; 40: 1912-6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.08.001
  27. Meechan JG, Kanaa MD, Corbett IP, Steen IN, Whitworth JM. Pulpal anaesthesia for mandibular permanent first molar teeth: a double-blind randomized cross-over trial comparing buccal and buccal plus lingual infiltration injections in volunteers. Int Endod J 2006; 39: 764-9.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01144.x
  28. Replogle K, Reader A, Nist R, Beck M, Weaver J, Meyers WJ. Cardiovascular effects of intraosseous injections of 2 percent lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 3 percent mepivacaine. J Am Dent Assoc 1999; 130: 649-57.  https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1999.0274
  29. Susi L, Reader A, Nusstein J, Beck M, Weaver J, Drum M. Heart rate effects of intraosseous injections using slow and fast rates of anesthetic solution deposition. Anesth Prog 2008; 55: 9-15. https://doi.org/10.2344/0003-3006(2008)55[9:HREOII]2.0.CO;2