Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society (한국도서관정보학회지)

Korean Library and Information Science Society (한국도서관정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Method for Recording Relationships with Related Entities in KORMARC Format

KORMARC에서의 개체 간 관계 기술 방안 연구

  • Jee-Hyun Rho
  • 노지현 (부산대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2024.08.17
  • Accepted : 2024.09.01
  • Published : 2024.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Since the IFLA FRBR conceptual model, the transition to a data structure centered on entity-relationships has been underway. Reflecting this international trend, the draft of the 5th edition of the Korean Cataloging Rules (KCR5) were presented in May 2024. This study focused on the 'relationship' which provides additional information to users by connecting one entity with other entities. To this end, (1) the types of relationships between entities defined in the conceptual model and RDA cataloging rule were examined, (2) the actual cases of LC and PCC to record relationships in MARC21 based on RDA were analyzed, and finally (3) practical methods and challenges to be solved for applying them to KORMARC format were suggested. This study mainly utilized RDA training materials and data input guidelines of LC/PCC, and referred to full-MARC bibliographic records and authority records of LC and PCC participating libraries. This study aims to broaden the understanding of the new bibliographic structure and to prepare for the transition to the next-generation bibliographic structure such as BIBFRAME in the future.

IFLA의 FRBR 모형이 발표된 후 개체관계 중심의 데이터 구조로의 전환이 본격화되고 있다. 국내에서도 이러한 국제적인 동향을 반영하여 2024년 5월에 한국목록규칙(KCR) 제5판 초안을 발표하였다. 이 연구는 관련 있는 개체를 서로 연결함으로써 이용자들이 개체 간 관계를 이해하고 탐색을 확장해 나가는데 사용되는 '관계'에 주목하였다. 이를 위해, (1) 개념모형과 RDA 목록규칙에 정의된 개체 간 관계의 유형을 살펴보고, (2) RDA에 근거하여 MARC21에 관계를 표현한 실제 사례를 LC와 PCC를 중심으로 분석한 후 (3) 이에 근거하여 KORMARC에 적용하기 위한 실무적 방안과 과제에 대해 논의하였다. 연구에 필요한 데이터는 RDA 교육자료와 LC와 PCC의 입력지침 등을 활용하되, LC와 PCC 참여도서관의 서지레코드와 전거레코드를 사례로 참고하였다. 이 연구는 새로운 서지구조에 대한 이해의 폭을 넓히고, 특히 국내에서는 거의 논의되어 있지 않았던 개체 간 관계를 KORMARC에 수용하기 위한 방안을 제안함으로써 향후 BIBFRAME과 같은 차세대 서지구조로의 전환에 대비하고자 하였다는 점에서 의의가 있다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 과제는 부산대학교 기본연구지원사업(2년)에 의하여 연구되었음.

References

  1. Ahn, Seohyeon & Lee, Chang Soo (2014). A study on the describing attributes and relationships of person in cataloging rules. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 25(3), 235-261. https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2014.25.3.235 
  2. Kim, Jeong-Hyen (2015). A study on the adoption of the FRBR according to the bibliographic relationships of Five Classics and Four Books. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 46(2), 317-336. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.46.2.201506.317 
  3. Lee, Chang Soo (2015). Describing attributes and relationships of families in cataloging rules. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 46(3), 27-49. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.46.3.201509.27 
  4. Lee, Mihwa (2016). A study on the construction of work and expression authority records. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 47(3), 71-94. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.47.3.201609.71 
  5. Lee, Mihwa (2018). A study on the considerations in rules for authorized access points of Music work. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 49(4), 147-166. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.49.4.201812.147 
  6. Lee, Mihwa (2019). Considerations for BIBFRAME acceptance of expression and representative expression attributes in LRM. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 30(2), 33-50. https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2019.30.2.033 
  7. Park, Mideum & Lee, Seungmin (2024). A study on the linking structure for authorized access point for manifestation based on the current bibliographic trends in South Korea. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 55(2), 109-132. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.55.2.202406.109 
  8. Rho, Jee-Hyun (2016). Suggestions on the revision of Korean cataloging rules for personal name authority records and authorized access point. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 47(2), 201-229. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.47.2.201606.201 
  9. Rho, Jee-Hyun (2023). A study on constructing preferred titles and authorized access points for religious works. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 54(4), 105-122. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.54.4.202312.105 
  10. Rho, Jee-Hyun, Lee, Mihwa, & Lee, Eun Ju (2023). Cataloging Theory and Practice. Seoul: Korean Library Association.
  11. IFLA (1998). Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records. IFLA Section on Cataloguing; K. G. Saur Munchen. 
  12. Library of Congress (2012). LC training materials, RDA Module 4: Relationship. Available: https://www.loc.gov/aba/rda/training_modules_LC.html 
  13. Library of Congress (2022). LC-PCC Metadata Guidance Document. Available: https://loc.gov/aba/rda/mgd/relationships/mg-relationshipsAgentWEMI.pdf 
  14. Library of Congress (2024). BIBFRAME Frequently Asked Questions. Available: https://www.loc.gov/bibframe/faqs/ 
  15. Library of Congress. PCC Directors. Available: https://www.loc.gov/aba/pcc/directors.html 
  16. PCC (2018). PCC Guidelines for the Application of Relationship Designators in NACO Authority Records. Available: https://www.loc.gov/aba/pcc/rda/guidelines/authority-relationships.pdf 
  17. PCC Standing Committee on Training (2015). Training Manual for Applying Relationship Designators in Bibliographic Record. Available: https://www.loc.gov/aba/pcc/sct/documents/rel-desig-guide-bib.pdf 
  18. RDA Steering Committee (2017). RDA Original Toolkit. Available: https://original.rdatoolkit.org 
  19. RDA Steering Committee (2020). RDA Official Toolkit. Available: https://access.rdatoolkit.org