한국구조물진단유지관리공학회 논문집 (Journal of the Korea institute for structural maintenance and inspection)

  • 제28권5호
  • /
  • Pages.30-37
  • /
  • 2024
  • /
  • 2234-6937(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-6979(eISSN)
한국구조물진단유지관리공학회 (Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance Inspection)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

교량의 위험성을 고려한 성능기반 자산가치 평가방법에 관한 연구

A Study on the Performance-Based Bridge Asset Valuation Methods Considering Hazard

  • 이용준 (한국토지주택공사 토지주택연구원) ;
  • 박경훈 (한국건설기술연구원 구조연구본부) ;
  • 선종완 (한국건설기술연구원 구조연구본부)
  • 투고 : 2024.08.22
  • 심사 : 2024.09.23
  • 발행 : 2024.10.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

사회기반시설의 자산가치 평가는 일반적으로 정액법을 기반으로 상각후대체원가를 적용하고 있으나 시설물의 실제 가치를 정확히 반영하지 못하는 한계가 있다. 이에 교량의 성능을 합리적으로 고려하여 자산가치를 평가할 수 있는 성능기반 감가상각(PBD) 방법이 제안되었으나 개별 교량들의 환경 특성을 고려하지 못하였다. 본 연구에서는 기존 연구에서 제안된 PBD 방법에 개별 교량의 위험성을 고려할 수 있는 위험성-성능기반 감가상각(HPBD) 방법을 제안하고 적용성 검토를 위하여 8천여 교량을 대상으로 평가를 수행하였다. 교량의 열화 위험요인을 선정하고 개별 교량들의 위험성을 평가하여 위험성수준에 따른 가중치를 기존 PBD 방법에 적용하였다. 평가결과 PBD 방법과 유사한 현재가치와 상대적으로 높은 미래가치가 도출되었으며, 개별 교량의 위험 특성을 고려한 HPBD 방법이 보다 합리적인 가치평가와 의사결정에 활용 될 수 있을 것으로 판단된다.

The valuation of infrastructure assets is typically conducted using the straight-line method, which employs the depreciated replacement cost as a basis. However, this approach has the limitation of failing to accurately reflect the actual value of the facility. In light of these considerations, the performance-based depreciation (PBD) method has been proposed as a means of evaluating the asset value of bridges on the basis of their performance, although it is not designed to take account of the environmental characteristics of individual bridges. This study proposes a hazard-performance based depreciation (HPBD) method that considers the risk level of individual bridges in the PBD method proposed in previous studies. The applicability of the proposed method was evaluated on more than 8,000 bridges. The risk factors for deterioration of bridges were selected, the hazard level of individual bridges was evaluated, and weights based on the hazard level were applied to the PBD method. The evaluation resulted in a present value comparable to that of the PBD method and a relatively high future value. It is postulated that the HPBD method, which considers the risk characteristics of individual bridges, can be used for a more reasonable evaluation and decision-making process.

키워드

과제정보

본 연구는 국토교통과학기술진흥원 "기반시설 첨단관리(Total care) 기술개발(RS-2022-00142566)" 연구과제의 지원을 받아 진행되었으며 이에 감사드립니다.

참고문헌

  1. CAO (2022), Measuring Infrastructure in Japan 2022, Cabinet Office, Japan.
  2. Chae, M., Voghell, L., and Choi, J. (2023) Simplified Deterioration Modeling for Highway Sign Support Systems. Eng. Proc. 2023, 36, 44, USA.
  3. Dojutrek, M. S., Makwana, P. A., and Labi, S. (2012), A Methodology for Highway Asset Valuation in Indiana, Publication FHWA/IN/JTRP-2012/31, Joint Transportation Research Program, Indiana Department of Transportation and Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana.
  4. EX (2020), A Study on Establishment of Maintenance Strategy to Extend the Service Life of Bridge Deck Slab, Korea Expressway Corporation Research Institute (in Korean).
  5. KICT (2022), Operation and Service of Bridge Management System, Report, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology (in Korean).
  6. KICT (2024a), Construction Cost Management Center, Available at: https://cost.kict.re.kr/(Accessed: August 1, 2024), Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology (in Korean).
  7. KICT (2024b), Bridge Management System, Available at: https://nbms.kict.re.kr/(Accessed: August 1, 2024), Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology (in Korean).
  8. Lee, Y. J., Park, K. H., and Sun, J. W. (2023), A Study on the Asset Valuation Method Based on the Performance Information of Bridge, Journal of the Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance and Inspection, 27(5), 57-66 (in Korean).
  9. MOIS (2022), Act on The Preparation for Earthquakes and Volcanic Eruptions, Ministry of the Interior and Safety (in Korean).
  10. MOLIT (2021), Special Act on Safety Control for Infrastructure. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, Korea (in Korean).
  11. MOLIT (2023), Guideline and Commentary of Safety Inspection and In-depth Safety Inspection for Structures-Bridge. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, Korea (in Korean).
  12. MOLIT (2024), Yearbook of Road Statistics, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, Korea (in Korean).
  13. MOSF (2016), Accounting Guidelines of Tangible Assets and Social Infrastructure, Ministry of Strategy and Finance (in Korean).
  14. PPS (2024), Construction Cost Information System, Available at: http://pcae.g2b.go.kr/(Accessed: August 1, 2024)., Public Procurement Service (in Korean).
  15. Seo, S. K. (2009), Minitab Reliability Analysis, Eretec (in Korean).