Nutrition Research and Practice

The Korean Nutrition Society (한국영양학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development and application of an evaluation tool for school food culture in elementary, middle, and high schools in Gyeonggi Province, South Korea

  • Meeyoung Kim (Department of Food and Nutrition, Kongju National University) ;
  • Sooyoun Kwon (Department of Food and Nutrition, Shingu University) ;
  • Sub-Keun Hong (Sinpung Elementary School) ;
  • Yeonhee Koo (Gyeonggido Office of Education) ;
  • Youngmi Lee (Department of Food and Nutrition, Myongji University)
  • Received : 2024.05.20
  • Accepted : 2024.08.08
  • Published : 2024.10.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: To encourage schools to transform school meal programs to be more educational, it is necessary to evaluate the related environment using a whole school approach. We developed a school food culture evaluation tool to quantitatively evaluate school food culture in Gyeonggi Province, Korea. SUBJECTS/METHODS: Based on a literature review, a school food culture evaluation system consisting of areas, subareas, indicators, and questions (scored on a 5-point scale) was constructed. The validity of the tool was reviewed using focus group interviews, the Delphi technique, and a preliminary survey. Subsequently, evaluation tool was applied to elementary, middle, and high schools in Gyeonggi Province. Data from 115 schools were used for the final analysis. This included 64 elementary schools, 29 middle schools, and 22 high schools. At least one respondent from each group-school administrators, teachers, and nutrition teachers (or dietitians)-participated. The results were compared at the school level. RESULTS: The evaluation tool consisted of 66 questions in 5 areas (institutional environment, physical environment, educational environment, educational governance, and school meal quality). The total average score for school food culture was 3.83 points (elementary school 3.89 points, middle school 3.76 points, and high school 3.76 points) and did not differ significantly among school levels. Among the 5 evaluation areas, scores were highest for institutional environment (4.43 points) and lowest for physical environment (3.07 points). Scores for educational environment, educational governance, and school meal quality were 3.86, 3.85, and 3.97 points, respectively. CONCLUSION: It is necessary to improve the physical environment to create a desirable school food culture in Gyeonggi Province. To effectively promote healthy eating, ongoing investment and interventions by local authorities at improving school food culture are needed, with an emphasis on particular factors, such as the eating environment and staff training.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This research was financially supported by grants from Gyeonggido Office of Education.

References

  1. Hart CS, Page A. The capability approach and school food education and culture in England: 'gingerbread men ain't gonna get me very far'. Camb J Educ 2020;50:673-93.
  2. Storey HC, Pearce J, Ashfield-Watt PA, Wood L, Baines E, Nelson M. A randomized controlled trial of the effect of school food and dining room modifications on classroom behaviour in secondary school children. Eur J Clin Nutr 2011;65:32-8.
  3. Faught EL, Gleddie D, Storey KE, Davison CM, Veugelers PJ. Healthy lifestyle behaviours are positively and independently associated with academic achievement: an analysis of self-reported data from a nationally representative sample of Canadian early adolescents. PLoS One 2017;12:e0181938.
  4. Ministry of Education (KR). The 5th School Meal Hygiene Management Guidelines. Sejong: Ministry of Education; 2021.
  5. The Korean Educational Development Institute. School Meal Satisfaction Survey. Jincheon: The Korean Educational Development Institute; 2018.
  6. Na HL, Kim MH, Choi MK. Evaluation of sanitary education and performance of sanitary management among school food service employees in Sejong. J Korean Diet Assoc 2019;25:17-29.
  7. Seo YH, Moon KD. Monitoring and risk assessment of pesticides in school foodservice products in Seoul, Korea. Korean J Food Preserv 2014;21:69-74.
  8. Kim YS, Kim BH, Kim KA, Kim DH, Yun HJ, Kwak SH, Kang KJ, Cho WH, Moh AR, Choi OK, et al. Safety assessment of biogenic amines in school-meal fishery products. J Food Hyg Saf 2020;35:125-35.
  9. Kim JH, Kim HS. A survey on the satisfaction of middle school students with school meals and their food preferences. J Korea Contents Assoc 2016;16:488-96.
  10. Lee KY, Bae YJ, Choi MK, Kim MH. Satisfaction on school meal service and food preference of elementary school students in Chungnam. Korean J Food Nutr 2017;30:129-38.
  11. Soil Association. The Food for Life Schools Award [Internet]. Edinburgh: Soil Association; 2024 [cited 2024 March 11]. Available from: https://www.foodforlife.org.uk/.
  12. US Department of Agriculture. The HealthierUS School Challenge [Internet]. Washington, D.C.: US Department of Agriculture; 2024 [cited 2024 March 11]. Available from: https://letsmove.obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/healthierus-school-challenge.
  13. Roos G. One size fits all? - differences in school food cultures identified in iPOPY research. In: Mikkelsen BE, He C, Mikkola M, Nielsen T, Nymoen LL, editors. CORE Organic Project Series Report. Tjele: ICROFS; 2009. p. 54-6.
  14. Action For Healthy Kids. Action For Healthy Kids' website [Internet]. Skokie (IL): Action For Healthy Kids; 2024 [cited 2024 March 11]. Available from: https://www.actionforhealthykids.org/.
  15. Great Schools Partnership. The glossary of education reform [Internet]. Portland: Great Schools Partnership; 2014 [cited 2024 March 11]. Available from: https://www.edglossary.org/.
  16. Kim MJ, Lee HM. Analysis of school culture research trends in Korea. J Yeolin Educ 2015;23:255-84.
  17. The Scottish Government. Better Eating, Better Learning: Self-Evaluation Tool. Edinburgh: The Scottish Government; 2014.
  18. Department for Education (UK). Healthy Schools Rating Scheme: Guidance for Schools. London: Department for Education; 2019.
  19. Ministry of Education (KR). Status of school lunch program in Korea [Internet]. Sejong: Ministry of Education; 2023 [cited 2023 December 10]. Available from: https://www.moe.go.kr.
  20. Wellness School Assessment Tool. Wellness School Assessment Tool's website [Internet]. Connecticut: Wellness School Assessment Tool; 2021 [cited 2024 March 11]. Available from: https://www.wellsat.org/.
  21. Food for Life. Food for Life Partnership [Internet]. Bristol: Food for Life; 2024 [cited 2024 March 11]. Available from: https://www.foodforlife.org.uk/.
  22. Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity. Person Psychol 1975;28:563-75.
  23. Denman S. Health promoting schools in England--a way forward in development. J Public Health Med 1999;21:215-20.
  24. The Korean Law Information Center. Enforcement Decree of the School Meal Act, Duties of Nutrition Teachers. Sejong: The Korean Law Information Center; 2021.
  25. Lee KH, Choi BS, Lee IS. Job satisfaction and perception of importance-performance among nutrition counseling by nutrition teachers in Kyungbuk area. J East Asian Soc Diet Life 2010;20:1018-28.
  26. Hart CS. The School Food Plan and the social context of food in schools. Camb J Educ 2016;46:211-31.
  27. Stroebele N, De Castro JM. Effect of ambience on food intake and food choice. Nutrition 2004;20:821-38.
  28. Sahota P, Woodward J, Molinari R, Pike J. Factors influencing take-up of free school meals in primary- and secondary-school children in England. Public Health Nutr 2014;17:1271-9.
  29. Golley R, Baines E, Bassett P, Wood L, Pearce J, Nelson M. School lunch and learning behaviour in primary schools: an intervention study. Eur J Clin Nutr 2010;64:1280-8.
  30. Marcano-Olivier MI, Horne PJ, Viktor S, Erjavec M. Using nudges to promote healthy food choices in the school dining room: a systematic review of previous investigations. J Sch Health 2020;90:143-57.
  31. Moore SN, Murphy S, Tapper K, Moore L. The social, physical and temporal characteristics of primary school dining halls and their implications for children's eating behaviors. Health Educ 2010;110:399-411.
  32. Varman SD, Cliff DP, Jones RA, Hammersley ML, Zhang Z, Charlton K, Kelly B. Experiential learning interventions and healthy eating outcomes in children: a systematic literature review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021;18:10824.
  33. Dimbleby H, Vincent J. The School Food Plan. London: Department for Education (UK); 2013.
  34. Parmer SM, Salisbury-Glennon J, Shannon D, Struempler B. School gardens: an experiential learning approach for a nutrition education program to increase fruit and vegetable knowledge, preference, and consumption among second-grade students. J Nutr Educ Behav 2009;41:212-7.
  35. Gyeonggido Office of Education. Autonomous Choice Meal Service Evaluation Report. Suwon: Gyeonggido Office of Education; 2023.
  36. Parsons C, Stears D, Thomas C. The health promoting school in Europe: conceptualising and evaluating the change. Health Educ J 1996;55:311-21.
  37. Jones M, Pitt H, Oxford L, Bray I, Kimberlee R, Orme J. Pupil Survey in Local Commission Areas: Food for Life's Impact on Primary School Children's Consumption of Fruit and Vegetables. Full Report. Bristol: University of the West of England; 2015.