DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Exposure Status and High-risk Industries of Special Management Substances using Working Environment Measurement Data

작업환경측정 자료를 활용한 특별관리물질 노출 현황 및 고위험 업종 분석

  • Hyunhee Park (Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute, KOSHA) ;
  • Jihoon Jo (Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute, KOSHA)
  • 박현희 (한국산업안전보건공단 산업안전보건연구원) ;
  • 조지훈 (한국산업안전보건공단 산업안전보건연구원)
  • Received : 2024.07.11
  • Accepted : 2024.09.20
  • Published : 2024.09.30

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to assess the current status of work environment measurement (WEM) for carcinogenic, mutagenic, reproductive toxic substances and to identify their high-risk industries for hazard surveillance and risk assessment. Methods: WEM Data from 37 specially managed CMR substances (2018-2022), the high-risk industries were identified by using estimated 95th percentile levels (X0.95) of measurements compared with the occupational exposure limit (OEL). Results: The substances most frequently measured were nickel (insoluble), followed by sulfuric acid, lead, chromium (VI), formaldehyde, phenol, dimethylformamide and benzene. The industries with highest number of measurement samples for special management substances were plating of metals, followed by hospitals, general repair services of motor vehicles, building of ships, manufacture of synthetic resin and other plastic materials, manufacture of finished medicaments. Out of the 37 special management substances studied, 22 had a non-detection rate of over 90%. The rate of samples exceeding the OEL was less than 1% for all substances. The substance with the highest number of samples exceeding the OEL was trichloroethylene, which also had the highest average concentration compared to exposure limit. The substances with the highest percentage of industries which (X0.95) exceeding OEL was formaldehyde followed by sulfuric acid, trichloroethylene, lead, I-bromopropane etc. Conclusions: This study identified high-risk industries of CMR sunstances, highlighting the need for prioritizing these industries in hazards surveillance and risk assessment.

Keywords

References

  1. ACGIH(American conference of governmental industrial hygienists). TLVs and BEIs, 2011
  2. AIHA(American Industrial Hygiene Association). Hallmark risk assessment tool in guidaance for conducting control banding analysis. AIHA, 2007
  3. AIHA(American Industrial Hygiene Association). A strategy for assessing and managing occupational exposure. AIHA, 2015
  4. An SH, Lee JH, Park JA. Evaluation of worker's health and occupational exposure to perchloroethylene in laundry. J Korean Soc Occup Environ Hyg 1994;4(2):224-239
  5. Armatas C, Loper B, Tandoc A, Materna B. Industries with the highest occupational blood lead test results, California Occupational Blood Lead Registry, 2020‒2021. Am J Public Health 2022;112(S7):S690-S694. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2022.307002
  6. Bahk JW, Kim SW, Yang SH, Ryu HW, Kim EA. Estimating the number of target workplaces for work environment monitoring using survey data among manufacturing businesses with more than five employees in 2016. Korean Soc Occup Environ Hyg 2018: 28(2): 166-174
  7. Baek KH, Park DU, Ha KC. Benzene exposure matrices using employees's exposure assessment data. J Korean Soc Occup Environ Hyg 2015;25(2): 146-155 https://doi.org/10.15269/JKSOEH.2015.25.2.146
  8. Bosetti C, McLaughlin JK, Tarone RE, Pira E, Vecchia CL. Formaldehyde and cancer risk: a quantitative review of cohort studies through. Ann Oncol 2008 Jan; 19(1):29-43 https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdm202
  9. Choi AR, Lim SG, Lee GY. Research on exposure to 13 types of substances subject to permissible standards - 2004-11, survey according to the results of work environment measurement by the Korean Occupational Health Association. Occupational Health, no.320, 2014, pp.19 - 32
  10. Choi SJ, Koh DH, Park JH, Park DU, Kim HC. Evaluation of the input status of exposure-related information of working environment monitoring database and special health examination database for the construction of a national exposure surveillance system. J Korean Soc Occup Environ Hyg 2022; 32(3): 231-241
  11. Coradduzza D, Congiargiu A, Azara E, Mohammed I, De Miglio MR. Heavy metals in biological samples of cancer patients: a systematic literature review. Biometals 2024
  12. Gu DC, Lee CK, Lee JW, Lee SY, Yun SY. Exposure to formaldehyde of ambulatory care nurses in university hospital. J Korean Soc Occup Environ Hyg 2014;24(4):446-452 https://doi.org/10.15269/JKSOEH.2014.24.4.446
  13. Ha KC, Park DU, Yoon CS, Choi SJ, Lee GY. Application of matrices and risk assessment of industries and processes using DMF. J Korean Soc Occup Environ Hyg 2008;18(4):303-309
  14. Ha KC, Kim SW, Phee YG, Lee NR. Strengthening the occupational exposure limit for 1-bromopropane according to the results of epidemiological studies and exposure status. J Korean Soc Occup Environ Hyg 2020;30(3): 270-279
  15. Hanley KW, Petersen MR, Cheever KL, Luo L. N-acetyl-S-(n-propyl)-L-cysteine in urine from workers exposed to 1-bromopropane in foam cushion spray adhesives. Ann Occup Hyg 2009;53(7):759-769.
  16. Huh GY, Ha HI, Park JH, Jang SJ. Fatal inhalation injuries by sulfuric acid fumes: case report. Korean J Leg Med 2013;37:216-219 https://doi.org/10.7580/kjlm.2013.37.4.216
  17. Hwang GS. Study on the Improvement of reliability assessment of work environment measurement in Korea. J Korean Soc Occup Environ Hyg 2019;29(1):50-56
  18. Jang JK, Park HD, Ro JW. Statistical analysis of domestic work environment monitoring big data. Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute, 2015
  19. Jeong JY, Lee NR, Lee BK, Kim BN. Kim KJ. An evaluation of exposure to petroleum based dry cleaning solvent used in commercial dry cleaning shops. J Korean Soc Occup Environ Hyg 2005;15(1):19-26
  20. Jeong KS, Ahn YS, Kim HS, Kim CN, Kim DH. Status of cleaning agent usage including 1,2-dichloropropane. Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute, 2017
  21. Kendzia B, Pesch B, Koppisch D, Van Gelder R, Pitzke K. Modelling of occupational exposure to inhalable nickel compounds Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology 2017;27:427-433 https://doi.org/10.1038/jes.2016.80
  22. Kim HS. TCE exposure assessment of cleaning workers. J Korean Soc Occup Environ Hyg 2023;33(1): 3-5
  23. Kim JH, Kim DJ, Kim HW. A study on exposure workers to formadehyde in endoscopy unit of hospital. J Korean Soc Occup Environ Hyg 2009;19(3): 195-201
  24. Kim JM, Won JI, Roh YM, Kim SW, Ki YH et al. Study on the improvement of appropriate interval of work environment measurement. Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute(OSHRI), 2007
  25. Koh DH, Park JH, Lee SG, Kim HC, Jung H et al. Estimation of lead exposure intensity by industry using nationwide exposure databases in Korea. Saf Health Work 2021;12(4):439-444 (https://doi:10.1016/j.shaw.2021.07.008)
  26. Lavoue J, Vincent R, Gerin M. Formaldehyde exposure in U.S. industries from OSHA air sampling data. J Occup Environ Hyg 2008;5(9):575-587 https://doi.org/10.1080/15459620802275023
  27. Lee JW, Park DU, Ha KC. Exposure characteristics of chemical hazards in metalworking operations using an employee exposure assessment database. J Korean Soc Occup Environ Hyg 2018;28(2): 230-239
  28. Lee SW, Kim EA, Kim DS, Koh DH, Kang SK. Exposure level of trichloroethylene in Stevens-Johnson syndrome due to occupational exposure - 3 case reports and a review of other cases. Korean J Occup Environ Med 2008;20(2):132-146 https://doi.org/10.35371/kjoem.2008.20.2.132
  29. Majersik JJ, Caravati EM, Steffens JD. Severe neurotoxicity associated with exposure to the solvent 1-bromopropane (n-propyl bromide). Clin Toxicol 2007;45(3):270-276. https://doi.org/10.1080/15563650701226218
  30. Ministry of Employment and Labo(MoEL). White Papers on Employment and Labor, 2006; 2014; 2020; 2022
  31. National Institute of Environment Research(NIER). Risk assessment of registered chemical substances: (2-Ethoxyethanol), 2022
  32. Park HD, Ro JW, Jang MY, Kim SH, Kim SD et al. Case study of 1-bromopropane exposure assessment during aircraft disinfection and seat cover replacement work. J Korean Soc Occup Environ Hyg 2024;34(1): 8-13
  33. Park HD, Park SH, Jung KH. Analysis of exposure levels for inorganic acids in Korea. J Korean Soc Occup Environ Hyg 2021a;31(3): 255-265
  34. Park SH, Bae GW, Kim JB, Kim SD. Strengthening occupational health services through monitoring exposure to health hazards. J Korean Soc Occup Environ Hyg 2021b;31(2): 147-155
  35. Phi YH. A study on the system of working environment measurement under Industrial Safety and Health Act. Environmental Law Review 2004;26(2):313-330
  36. Roh JW. Sampling and analytical methods of permitted standard substances according to the revision of the OSH Act-1,2-dichloropropane. Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute, 2020(2020-OSHRI834)
  37. Roh YM, Kwon GB, Park SH, Jeong JY. A survey on the management of chemical substances and airborne concentration in laundry exposed to organic solvents. J Korean Soc Occup Environ Hyg 2001;11(1):70-77
  38. Santonen T, Porras S, Bocca B, Bousoumah R, Corneliu Duca R. HBM4EU chromates study - Overall results and recommendations for the biomonitoring of occupational exposure to hexavalent chromium. Environ Res 2022;204(Pt A):111984
  39. Scarselli A, Di Marzio D, Marinaccio A, Iavicoli S. Nickel compounds in the workplaces: Occupations and activities involving high-risk exposures in Italy American Journal of Industrial Medicine 2018;61(12):968-977 https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.22914
  40. Son MA, Yun JW, Hwang YS, Park MJ, Choi MS. Exposure of carcinogens in electronics industries and strategy for control of carcinogens: using Work Environment Measurement Database (2013-2017) in Korea. J Korean Soc Occup Environ Hyg 2022;32(4): 302-324
  41. Statistics Korea. 10th Korea Standard Industrial Classification. Accessed 2024 06 30. available from URL: http://www.kssc.kostat.go.kr