Steel and Composite Structures

  • 제53권1호
  • /
  • Pages.29-43
  • /
  • 2024
  • /
  • 1229-9367(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1598-6233(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An experimental and numerical study on the behavior of butterfly-dampers with shear and flexural mechanism

  • Seong‐Hoon Jeong (Department of Architectural Eng, Inha University) ;
  • Ali Ghamari (Department of Civil Eng, Ilam branch, Islamic Azad University) ;
  • Reneta Kotynia (Department of Concrete Structures, Lodz University of Technology)
  • 투고 : 2024.07.10
  • 심사 : 2024.09.14
  • 발행 : 2024.10.10
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

In this paper, the behavior of an innovative metallic a butterfly-shaped link as damper with shear and flexural mechanism was investigated experimentally and numerically. The damper is directly attached to the diagonal member of the Concentrically Braced Frame (CBF) to prevent buckling of the braces. Since it is expected that nonlinear behavior of the system is limited to the dampers, the other parts of structures remind elastic that the damper can replaced easily after a severe earthquake. The experimental outcomes indicated that both types of dampers (with shear or flexural mechanism) pertain to stable hysteresis loops without any significant degradation in stiffness or strength. Comparing the dampers indicated that the shear damper has a greater ultimate strength (4.59 times) and stiffness (3.58 times) than flexural damper but a lower ductility (16%) and ultimate displacement (60%). Also, the shear damper has a considerable dissipation energy 14.56 times greater than flexural dampers where dissipating energy are affected by ultimate strength, stiffness and ultimate displacement. Also, based on the numerical study, the effect of main plate slenderness on the behavior of the damper was considered and the allowable slenderness was suggested to the design of the dampers. Numerical results confirmed that the flexural damper is more sensitive to the slenderness than shear damper. Accordingly, as the slenderness is less than 50 and 30, respectively, for, shear and flexural damper, no degradation in ultimate strength is realized. By increasing the slenderness, the maximum reduction of the ultimate strength, stiffness, and energy dissipation capacity reached by 16%, 7%, and 17% for SDB dampers whereas it is 3%, 33%, 20%, and 45% for MDB.

키워드

과제정보

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government. (MSIT) (RS-2023-00278784).

참고문헌

  1. Acosta, J., Bojorquez, E., Bojorquez, J., Reyes-Salazar, A., Ruiz-Garcia, J., Ruiz, S.E. and Iovinella, I. (2024), "Seismic performance of steel buildings with eccentrically braced frame systems with different configurations", Buildings, 14, 118. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14010118.
  2. AISC 341. (2016), Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings. USA-2016.
  3. Bagheri, S., Barghian, M., Saieri, F. and Farzinfar, A. (2015), "U-Bozkurt, M.B., Kazemzadeh Azad, S. and Topkaya, C. (2019), "Development of detachable replaceable links for eccentrically braced frames", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyb., 48(10), 1134-1155. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3181.
  4. Caprili, S., Mussini, N. and Salvatore, W. (2018), "Experimental and numerical assessment of EBF structures with shear links", Steel Compos. Struct., 28(2), 123-138. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2018.28.2.123.
  5. Choi, J. and Abebe, D. (2014), "Hysteresis characteristics of Shear panel damper using SLY120", APCBEE Procedia, 9, 370-375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcbee.2014.01.065.
  6. De Matteis, G., Formisano, A. and Mazzolani, F.M. (2009), "An innovative methodology for seismic retrofitting of existing RC buildings by metal shear panels", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 38, 61-78.
  7. Deng, K., Pan, P., Sun, J. Liu, J. and Xue, Y. (2014), "Shape optimization design of steel shear panel dampers", J. Constr. Steel Res., 99, 187-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2014.03.001.
  8. Ferraioli, M., Laurenza, B., Lavino, A., Frattolillo, C. and De Matteis, G. (2023a), "Seismic retrofit of a steel-reinforced concrete hospital building using continuous energy-dissipative steel columns", Steel Compos. Struct., 47(4), 467-488.
  9. Ferraioli, M., Lavino, A. and De Matteis, G. (2023b), "A design method for seismic retrofit of reinforced concrete frame buildings using aluminum shear panels", Archives Civil Mech. Eng., 23(2), 106.
  10. Ghabraie, K., Chan, R., Huang, X. and Xie, Y.M. (2010), "Shape optimization of metallic yielding devices for passive mitigation of seismic energy", Eng. Struct., 32(2010), 2258-2267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.03.028.
  11. Ghaedi, K., Ibrahim, Z. and Javanmardi, A. (2018), "A new metallic bar damper device for seismic energy dissipation of civil structures", IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 431(12), 122009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/431/12/122009.
  12. Ghamari, A., Kim, C. and Jeong, S. (2022), "Development of an innovative metallic damper for concentrically braced frame systems based on experimental and analytical studies", Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build., 31(8), e1927. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1927.
  13. Ghamari, A., Kim, Y. and Bae, J. (2021), "Utilizing an I-shaped shear link as a damper to improve the behaviour of a concentrically braced frame", J. Construct. Steel Res., 186, 106915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2021.106915.
  14. Ghamari, A., Thongchom, C., Putra Jaya, R. and Sithole, T. (2023), "Utilizing low yield point steel to improve the behavior of the I-shaped shear links as dampers", Buildings, 13(2), 554. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13020554.
  15. Jia, M., Chen, Y. and Jin, P. (2024), "Development and validation analysis of a steel-lead hybrid dual-yield BRB for multi-stage seismic energy dissipation", Thin-Wall. Struct., 199, 111822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2024.111822.
  16. Kim, J. and Choi, H. (2004), "Behavior and design of structures with buckling-restrained braces", Eng. Struct., 12(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2003.09.010.
  17. Krawinkler, H. (1992), ATC-24 Guidelines for Cyclic Seismic Testing of Components of Steel Structures. Applied Technology Council.
  18. Lee, C.K., Ju, Y., Min, J., Lho, S. and Kim, S. (2015), "Nonuniform steel strip dampers subjected to cyclic loadings", Eng. Struct., 99(15), 192-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.04.052.
  19. Matinell, L., Mulas, M.G. and Perotti, F. (1996), "The seismic response of the concentrically braced frame", 25, 1275-1299. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096.
  20. Mottola, S., Ferraioli, M., Mistakidis, E. and De Matteis, G. (2024), "Behavior and design of dumbbell-shaped steel strip dampers", Lecture Notes Civil Eng., 520, 174-186. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-62888-7_16.
  21. Pandikkadavath, M.S. and Sahoo, D.R. (2017), "Mitigation of seismic drift response of braced frames using short yieldingcore BRBs", Steel Compos. Struct., 23(3), 285-302. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2017.23.3.285.
  22. Rezaeian, A.R., Shayanfar, M.A. and Jelokhani, P. (2022), "The experimental study of eccentrically braced frames with double vertical links", J. Construct. Steel Res., 199, 107587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2022.107587.
  23. Roeder, C.W. andPopov, E.P. (1977), "Inelastic behavior of eccentrically braced steel frames under cyclic loadings", Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
  24. shaped metallic-yielding damper in building structures: Seismic behavior and comparison with a friction damper", Structures, 3, 163-171, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2015.04.003.
  25. Shi, J., Jin, S., Xu, L., Liu, Y. and Zhang, R. (2023), "Theoretical and numerical studies of elastic buckling and load resistance of a shuttle-shaped double-restrained buckling-restrained brace", Buildings, 13(8), 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13081967.
  26. Tadepalli, R., Rao, C., Rao, N. and Sastry, R. (2022), "Fabrication and characterization of MR damper as a semi-active device for vehicle suspension system", Int. J. Modern Studies Mech. Eng., (IJMSME), 8, 1-10, http://dx.doi.org/10.20431/2454-9711.0801001.
  27. Xu, Y., Li, A., Zhou, X. and Sun, P. (2011), "Shape optimization study of mild steel slit dampers", Adv. Mater. Res., 168-170. 2434-2438. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.168-170.2434.
  28. Xu, Z., Dai, J. and Jiang, Q. (2018), "Study on fatigue life and mechanical properties of BRBs with viscoelastic filler", Steel Compos. Struct., 26(2), 139-150. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2018.26.2.139.
  29. Yao, Z., Wang, W. and Zhu, Y. (2021), "Experimental evaluation and numerical simulation of low-yield-point steel shear panel dampers", Eng. Struct., 245, 112860.
  30. Yin, Z., Feng, D. and Yang, W. (2019), "Damage analyses of replaceable links in eccentrically braced Frame (EBF) subject to cyclic loading", Appl. Sci., 9(2), 332. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9020332.
  31. Zhu, B., Zhao, J. and Yang, Y. (2023), "Design method of core-separated assembled buckling restrained braces confined by two lightweight concrete-infilled tubes", Appl. Sci., 13(7), 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13074306.
  32. Zhuang, L., Wang, J., Nie, X. and Wu, Z. (2022), "Experimental study on seismic behaviour of eccentrically braced composite frame with vertical LYP steel shear link", Eng. Struct., 255, 113957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.113957.