Acknowledgement
This study (Project No. PJ01723001) was carried out with the support of National Institute of Animal Sciences, Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.
References
- Song HY, El Sheikha AF, Hu DM. 2019. The positive impacts of microbial phytase on its nutritional applications. Trend Food Sci. Technol. 86: 553-562.
- Humer E, Schwarz C, Schedle K. 2015. Phytate in pig and poultry nutrition. J. Anim Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 99: 605-625.
- Singh P. 2008. Significance of phytic acid and supplemental phytase in chicken nutrition: a review. Worlds Poult. Sci. J. 64: 553-580.
- Ahuja K, Malkani T. 2022. Animal feed enzymes market size, by product (phytase, carbohydrase, protease, non-starch polysaccharide), by form (dry, liquid), by livestock (poultry, swine, aquaculture, ruminant, others) & global forecast, 2023-2032. Global Market Insights.
- Nuobariene L, Hansen A, Jespersen L, Arneborg N. 2011. Phytase-active yeasts from grain-based food and beer. J. Appl. Microbiol. 110: 1370-1380.
- Li W, O'Neill KR, Haft DH, DiCuccio M, Chetvernin V, Badretdin A, et al. 2021. RefSeq: expanding the Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline reach with protein family model curation. Nucleic Acids Res. 49: D1020-D1028.
- Zheng J, Ge Q, Yan Y, Zhang X, Huang L, Yin Y. 2023. dbCAN3: automated carbohydrate-active enzyme and substrate annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 51: W115-W121.
- Nannan C, Vu HQ, Gillis A, Caulier S, Nguyen TTT, Mahillon J. 2021. Bacilysin within the Bacillus subtilis group: gene prevalence versus antagonistic activity against Gram-negative foodborne pathogens. J. Biotechnol. 327: 28-35.
- Rahman FB, Sarkar B, Moni R, Rahman MS. 2021. Molecular genetics of surfactin and its effects on different sub-populations of Bacillus subtilis. Biotechnol. Rep. 32: e00686.