Earthquakes and Structures

  • 제27권4호
  • /
  • Pages.331-344
  • /
  • 2024
  • /
  • 2092-7614(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2092-7622(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Site specific fragility modification factor for mid-rise RC buildings based on plastic energy dissipation

  • Merin Mathews (Department of Civil Engineering, NITK) ;
  • B.R. Jayalekshmi (Department of Civil Engineering, NITK) ;
  • Katta Venkataramana (Department of Civil Engineering, NITK)
  • 투고 : 2024.03.08
  • 심사 : 2024.08.13
  • 발행 : 2024.10.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The performance of reinforced concrete buildings subjected to earthquake excitations depends on the structural behaviour of the superstructure as well as the type of foundation and the properties of soil on which the structure is founded. The consideration of the effects due to the interaction between the structure and soil- foundation alters the seismic response of reinforced concrete buildings subjected to earthquake motion. Evaluation of the structural response of buildings for quantitative assessment of the seismic fragility has been a demanding problem for the engineers. Present research deals with development of fragility curve for building specific vulnerability assessment based on different damage parameters considering the effect of soil-structure interaction. Incremental Dynamic Analysis of fixed base and flexible base RC building models founded on different soil conditions was conducted using finite element software. Three sets of fragility curves were developed with maximum roof displacement, inter storey drift and plastic energy dissipated as engineering demand parameters. The results indicated an increase in the likelihood of exceeding various damage limits by 10-40% for flexible base condition with soft soil profiles. Fragility curve based on energy dissipated showed a higher probability of exceedance for collapse prevention damage limit whereas for lower damage states, conventional methods showed higher probability of exceedance. With plastic energy dissipated as engineering demand parameter, it is possible to track down the intensity of earthquake at which the plastic deformation starts, thereby providing an accurate vulnerability assessment of the structure. Fragility modification factors that enable the transformation of existing fragility curves to account for Soil-Structure Interaction effects based on different damage measures are proposed for different soil conditions to facilitate a congenial vulnerability assessment for buildings with flexible base conditions.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Anand, V. and Kumar, S.R.S. (2018), "Seismic soil-structure interaction : A state-of-the-art review", Struct., 16, 317-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2018.10.009.
  2. ASCE (2000), FEMA 356 Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Building, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, USA.
  3. ATC-40-Vol-2 (1996), Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings, Applied Technology Council (ATC), Redwood City, CA, USA.
  4. Barbat, A.H., Pujades, L.G. and Lantada, N. (2008), "Seismic damage evaluation in urban areas using the capacity spectrum method: Application to Barcelona", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 28(10-11), 851-865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2007.10.006.
  5. Bariker, P. (2022), "Dynamic soil structure interaction of a high-rise building resting over a finned pile mat", Infrastr., 7(10), 142. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures7100142.
  6. Brunelli, A., de Silva, F. and Cattari, S. (2022), "Site effects and soil-foundation-structure interaction: derivation of fragility curves and comparison with codes-conforming approaches for a masonry school", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 154, 107125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.107125.
  7. Comision Sismologica Europea (1998), Escala Macro Sismica Europea EMS - 98, Vol. 15, Comision Sismologica Europea.
  8. FEMA (2015), Technical and User's Manual of Advanced Engineering Building Module (AEBM) 'Hazus MH 2.1', Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C., USA.
  9. Firoj, M., Bahuguna, A., Kanth, A. and Agrahari, R. (2022), "Effect of nonlinear soil - structure interaction and lateral stiffness on seismic performance of mid - rise RC building", J. Build. Eng., 59, 105096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105096.
  10. Goodarzi, M.J., Moradi, M., Jalali, P., Abdolmohammadi, M. and Hasheminejad, S.M. (2023), "Fragility assessment of an outrigger structure system based on energy method", Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build., 32(11-12), 1-20, https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.2017.
  11. Hakamian, I., Taghikhani, K., Manouchehri, N. and Memarpour, M.M. (2023), "Soil-structure interaction effects on collapse probability of the RC buildings subjected to far and near-field ground motions", Earthq. Struct., 25(2), 99-112, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2023.25.2.099.
  12. Halder, L. and Paul, S. (2016), "Seismic Damage evaluation of gravity load designed low rise RC building using non-linear static method", Procedia Eng., 144, 1373-1380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.05.167.
  13. Hazus Earthquake Model Technical Manual Hazus 4.2 SP3 (2020), Hazus Earthquake Model Technical Manual Hazus 4.2 SP3, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C., USA.
  14. Housner, G.W. (1960), "The plastic failure of frames during earthquakes", 2nd World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Tokyo and Kyoto, Japan, July.
  15. Iran National Standard No. 2800 (2005), Iranian Code of Practice for Seismic Resistance Design of Buildings: Standard No. 2800, Building and Housing Research Center, Tehran, Iran.
  16. Jayalekshmi, B.R., Thomas, A. and Shivashankar, R. (2014), "Dynamic soil-structure interaction studies on 275m tall industrial chimney with openings", Earthq. Struct., 7(2), 233-250. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2014.7.2.233.
  17. Kassem, M.M., Mohamed Nazri, F. and Noroozinejad Farsangi, E. (2020), "The seismic vulnerability assessment methodologies: A state-of-the-art review", Ain Shams Eng. J., 11(4), 849-864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2020.04.001.
  18. Mibang, D. and Choudhury, S. (2022), "Seismic reliability of structures based on fragility analysis: A review", Struct. Integr., 19(10), 535-551. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98335-2_37.
  19. Mathews, M., Venkat Kishore, T., Jayalekshmi, B.R. and Venkataramana, K. (2023), "Vulnerability assessment of RC buildings with irregularities using probabilistic analysis", Mater. Today Proc., 2023, 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.04.651.
  20. Matsagar, V. (2015), Advances in Structural Engineering: Materials, Springer New Delhi, New Delhi, India.
  21. Moffed, M., Mohamed, F. and Noroozinejad, E. (2020), "On the quantification of collapse margin of a retrofitted university building in Beirut using a probabilistic approach", Eng. Sci. Technol. Int. J., 23(2), 373-381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2019.05.003.
  22. Moradi, M. and Abdolmohammadi, M. (2020), "Seismic fragility evaluation of a diagrid structure based on energy method", J. Constr. Steel Res., 174, 106311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2020.106311.
  23. Mortezaie, H. and Rezaie, F. (2018), "Seismic behavior and dissipated plastic energy of performance-based-designed high-rise concrete structures with considering soil-structure interaction effect", Civil Eng. Infrastr. J., 51(1), 199-215. https://doi.org/10.7508/ceij.2018.01.011.
  24. Patil, S.J., Reddy, G.R., Shivshankar, R., Babu, R., Jayalekshmi, B.R. and Kumar, B. (2016), "Seismic base isolation for structures using river sand", Earthq. Struct., 10(4), 829-847. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.10.4.829.
  25. Petridis, C. and Pitilakis, D. (2020), "Fragility curve modifiers for reinforced concrete dual buildings, including nonlinear site effects and soil-structure interaction", Earthq. Spectra, 36(4), 1930-1951. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755293020919430.
  26. Pitilakis, D. and Petridis, C. (2022), "Fragility curves for existing reinforced concrete buildings, including soil-structure interaction and site amplification effects", Eng. Struct., 269, 114733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114733.
  27. Poudel, N. and Chaulagain, H. (2024), "Results in engineering numerical investigation of nonlinear soil-structure interaction effects on response of irregular RC buildings", Result. Eng., 22, 102161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2024.102161.
  28. Rajkumari, S., Thakkar, K. and Goyal, H. (2022a), "Fragility analysis of structures subjected to seismic excitation : A state-of-the-art review", Struct., 40, 303-316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.04.023.
  29. Rajkumari, S., Thakkar, K. and Goyal, H. (2022b), "Fragility analysis of structures subjected to seismic excitation: A state-of-the-art review", Struct., 40, 303-316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.04.023.
  30. Ramirez-Gaytan, A., Preciado, A., Flores-Estrella, H., Santos, J.C. and Alcantara, L. (2022), "Seismic resonance vulnerability assessment on shear walls and framed structures with different typologies: The case of Guadalajara, Mexico", Earthq. Struct., 22(3), 263-275. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2022.22.3.263.
  31. Sharma, N., Dasgupta, K. and Dey, A. (2018), "A state-of-the-art review on seismic SSI studies on building structures", Innov. Infrastr. Solut., 3(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-017-0118-z.
  32. Simulia (2014), ABAQUS Theory Manual, ABAQUS 6.13 Documentation, Dassault Systemes Simulia Corp., Providence, RI, USA.
  33. Tahghighi, H. and Mohammadi, A. (2020), "Numerical evaluation of soil-structure interaction effects on the seismic performance and vulnerability of reinforced concrete buildings", Int. J. Geomech., 20(6), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gm.1943-5622.0001651.
  34. Vamvatsikos, D. and Cornell, C.A. (2002), "The incremental dynamic analysis and its application to performance-based earthquake engineering", Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, London, UK, September.
  35. Verki, A.M. and Preciado, A. (2022), "Nonlinear incremental dynamic analysis and fragility curves of tall steel buildings with buckling restrained braces and tuned mass dampers", Earthq. Struct., 22(2), 169-184. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2022.22.2.169.
  36. Verki, A.M., Preciado, A. and Motlagh, P.A. (2023), "Seismic performance of moment resisting steel frames retrofitted with coupled steel plate shear walls with different link beams", Steel Compos. Struct., 46(5), 591-609. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2023.46.5.591.
  37. Vona, M. (2014), "Fragility curves of existing rc buildings based on specific structural performance levels", Open J. Civil Eng., 4(2), 120-134. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojce.2014.42011.
  38. Whittaker, A., Deierlein, G., Hooper, J. and Merovich, A. (2004), "ATC-58 project task report: Engineering demand parameters for structural framing systems", The ATC-58 Structural Performance Products Team, Applied Technology Council (ATC), Redwood City, CA, USA.
  39. Zentner, I., Gundel, M. and Bonfils, N. (2017), "Fragility analysis methods: Review of existing approaches and application", Nucl. Eng. Des., 323, 245-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2016.12.021.