Earthquakes and Structures

  • 제27권4호
  • /
  • Pages.303-315
  • /
  • 2024
  • /
  • 2092-7614(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2092-7622(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Cumulative damage modeling for RC girder bridges under probabilistic multiple earthquake scenarios

  • Lang Liu (School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing Jiaotong University ) ;
  • Hao Luo (School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing Jiaotong University ) ;
  • Mingming Wang (Sichuan Earthquake Agency) ;
  • Yanhang Wang (School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing Jiaotong University ) ;
  • Changqi Zhao (School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing Jiaotong University ) ;
  • Nanyue Shi (School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing Jiaotong University )
  • 투고 : 2024.06.04
  • 심사 : 2024.07.22
  • 발행 : 2024.10.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This study proposes a comprehensive methodology for estimating accumulative damage of bridge structures under multiple seismic excitations, in the framework of site-specific probabilistic hazard analysis. Specifically, a typical earthquake-prone region in China is chosen to perform probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) to find the mean annual rate (MAR) of ground motion intensity at a specific level, based on which, a mass of ground motion observations is selected to construct random earthquake sequences with various number of shocks. Then, nonlinear time history analysis is implemented on the finite element (FE) model of a RC girder bridge at the site of interest, to investigate structural responses under different earthquake sequences, and to develop predictive model for cumulative damage computation, in which, a scalar seismic intensity measure (IM) is adopted and its performance in damage prediction is discussed by an experimental column. Furthermore, a mathematic model is established to calculate occurrence probability of earthquakes with various number of shocks, based on PSHA and homogenous Poisson random process, and a modified cumulative damage indicator is proposed, accounting for probabilistic occurrence of various earthquake scenarios. At end, the applicability of the proposed methodology to main shock and aftershock scenarios is validated, and characteristics of damage accumulation under different multiple earthquake scenarios are discussed.

키워드

과제정보

The authors would acknowledge the financial support of the Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51708069), the Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing (Grant No. cstc2018jcyjA2535) and Team Building Project for Graduate Tutors in Chongqing (Grant No. JDDSTD2022003).

참고문헌

  1. AASHTO (2011), Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design, American Association of State and Highway Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., USA.
  2. Abdollahzadeh, G. and Faghihmaleki, H. (2018), "Proposing a method for robustness index evaluation of the structures based on the risk analysis of main shock and aftershock", Int. J. Steel Struct., 18(5), 1710-1722. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-018-0081-3.
  3. Aljawhari, K., Gentile, R. and Freddi, F. (2021), "Effects of ground-motion sequences on fragility and vulnerability of case-study reinforced concrete frames", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 19, 6329-6635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-01006-8.
  4. Amato, A., Azzara, R. and Chiarabba, C. (1998), "The 1997 Umbria-Maarche, Italy, earthquake sequence: A first look at the main shocks and aftershocks", Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 2861-2864. https://doi.org/10.1029/98GL51842.
  5. Baker, J.W. and Cornell, C.A. (2005), "Vector-values ground motion intensity measures for probabilistic seismic demand analysis", The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
  6. Baker, J.W. and Cornell, C.A. (2006), "Spectral shape, epsilon and record selection", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 35(9), 1077-1095. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.571.
  7. Bandini, P.A.C., Padgett, J.E., Paultre, P. and Siqueira, G.H. (2022), "Seismic fragility of bridges: An approach coupling multiple-stripe analysis and Gaussian mixture for multicomponent structures", Earthq. Spectra, 38(1), 254-282. https://doi.org/10.1177/87552930211036164.
  8. Bradley, B.A. and Cubrinovski, M. (2011), "Near-source strong ground motions observed in the 22 Feburary 2011 Christchurch earthquake", Seismol. Res. Lett., 82, 853-865. https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.82.6.853.
  9. Burton, H.V. and Sharma, M. (2017), "Quantifying the reduction in collapse safety of main shock-damaged reinforced concrete frames with infills", Earthq. Spectra, 33(1), 25-44. http://doi.org/10.1193/121015EQS179M.
  10. Caltrans (2013), Seismic Design Criteria- Version 1.7., California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, CA, USA.
  11. Chen, X., Xiang, N.L., Guan, Z.G. and Li, J.Z. (2022), "Seismic vulnerability assessment of tall pier bridges under main shock-aftershock-like earthquake sequences using vector-valued intensity measure", Eng. Struct., 253, 113732. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113732.
  12. Cornell, C., Allin, J.F., Hamburger, R.O. anbd Foutch, D.A. (2002), "Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency steel moment frame guidelines", J. Struct. Eng., 128, 526-533. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:4(526).
  13. Deb, A., Zha, A.L., Withall, Z., Conte, J.P. and Restrepo, J.I. (2018), "Performance-based seismic design of ordinary standard bridges", Research Report No. SSRP-18/06; University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.
  14. Du, Y.N., Feng, D.C. and Wu, G. (2024), "InSAR-based rapid damage assessment of urban building portfolios following the 2023 Turkey earthquake", Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., 103, 104317. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104317.
  15. Ghosh, J., Padgett, J.E. and Silva, M. (2015), "Seismic damage accumulation in highway bridges in earthquake-prone regions", Earthq. Spectra, 31(1), 115-135. http://doi.org/10.1193/120812EQS347M.
  16. Iervolino, I., Giorgio, M. and Chioccarelli, E. (2015), "Markovian modeling of seismic damage accumulation", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 45, 441-461. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2668.
  17. Jalayer, F., Asprone, D., Prota, A. and Manfredi, G. (2011), "A decision support system for post-earthquake reliability assessment of structures subjected to aftershocks: An application to L'Aquila earthquake, 2009", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 9(4), 997-1014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-010-9230-6.
  18. Jia, J.F., Song, N.H. and Bai, Y.L. (2015), "Structural damage distribution induced by Wenchuan Earthquake on 12th May, 2008", Earthq. Struct., 9(1), 93-109. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.9.1.093.
  19. JTG/T 2231-01-2020 (2020), Specifications for Seismic Design of Highway Bridges, Ministry of Communications of the People's Republic of China, Beijing, China.
  20. Luco, N. and Cornell, C.A. (2007), "Structure-specific scalar intensity measures for near-source and ordinary earthquake ground motions", Earthq. Spectra, 23(2), 357-392. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2723158.
  21. Mercedes, N.R., Erazo, K. and Sarno, L.D. (2022), "Seismic fragility curves for a concrete bridge using structural health monitoring and digital twins", Earthq. Struct., 22(5), 503-515. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2022.22.5.503.
  22. Montes-Iturrizaga, R., Heredia-Zavoni, E. and Esteva, L. (2003), "Optimal maintenance strategies for structures in seismic zones", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 32, 245-264. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.222.
  23. Muvafik, M. (2014), "Field investigation and seismic analysis of a historical brick masonry minaret damaged during the Van Earthquakes in 2011", Earthq. Struct., 6(5), 457-472. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2014.6.5.457.
  24. Nettis, A., Raffaele, D. and Giuseppina, U. (2024), "Seismic risk-informed prioritization of multi-span RC girder bridges considering knowledge-based uncertainty", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 22, 693-729. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-023-01783-y.
  25. Noghabi, V.A. and Bargi, K. (2022), "Development of an uncertainty quantification approach with reduced computational cost for seismic fragility assessment of cable-stayed bridges", Earthq. Struct., 23(4), 385-401. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2022.23.4.385
  26. Ommi, S. and Zafarani, H. (2018), "Probabilistic aftershock hazard analysis, two case studies in West and Northwest Iran", J. Seismol., 22(1), 137-152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-017-9696-7.
  27. Shin, M. and Kim, B. (2017), "Effects of frequency contents of aftershock ground motions on reinforced concrete (RC) bridge columns", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 97, 48-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.02.012.
  28. Tesfamariam, S., Goda, K. and Mondal, G. (2015), "Seismic vulnerability of reinforced concrete frame with unreinforced masonry infill due to main shock-aftershock earthquake sequences", Earthq. Spectra, 31(3), 1427-1449. https://doi.org/10.1193/042313EQS111M.
  29. Tubaldi, E., Freddi, F. and Barbato, M. (2016), "Probabilistic seismic demand model for pounding risk assessment", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 45, 1743-1758. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2725.
  30. Turchetti, F., Tubaldi, E., Patelli, E., Castaldo, P. and Malaga-Chuquitaype, C. (2023), "Damage modelling of a bridge pier subjected to multiple earthquakes: A comparative study", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 21, 4541-4564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-023-01678-y.
  31. Wang, P., Shi, Q.X., Wang, F. and Guo, S.S. (2020), "Damage assessment of an SRC frame-core tube structure under the action of a main aftershock sequence", Adv. Civil Eng., 2020, 1308530. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1308530.
  32. Wang, T., Chen, J., Zhou, Y.J., Wang, X.Q., Lin, X.C., Wang, X.T. and Shang, Q.X. (2023), "Preliminary investigation of building damage in Hatay under February 6, 2023 Turkey earthquakes", Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib., 22(4), 853-866. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-023-2201-0.
  33. Wang, Z.J. and Zhao, B.M. (2015), "Correlations between structural damage and ground motion parameters during the Ms8.0 Wenchuan Earthquake", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 72, 129-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.11.005.
  34. Zhang, Y.N., Zhi, X.D. and Fan, F. (2020), "Fragility analysis of reticulated domes subjected to multiple earthquakes", Eng. Struct., 211, 110450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110450.
  35. Zhao, B. and Taucer, F. (2010), "Performance of infrastructure during the May 12, 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake in China", J. Earthq. Eng., 14(4), 578-600. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460903274053.
  36. Zhou, W.S., Li, H., Mao, C.X., Mevel, L. and Ou, J.P. (2013), "Seismic damage detection for a masonry building using aftershock monitoring data", Adv. Struct. Eng., 16(4), 605-618. https://doi.org/10.1260/1369-4332.16.4.605.