DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Nutritional Assessment of Protein and Sodium Contents in Commercial Senior-Friendly Foods

  • Yun-A Lee (Department of Food and Nutrition, Kongju National University) ;
  • Mi-Kyeong Choi (Department of Food and Nutrition, Kongju National University)
  • 투고 : 2024.06.05
  • 심사 : 2024.07.14
  • 발행 : 2024.07.31

초록

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the nutritional adequacy of senior-friendly foods sold in Korea, focusing on protein and sodium. This study examined the nutritional content of 170 products with nutritional labels that were sold in online stores in Korea and categorized the products into 93 staple foods (cooked rice, porridge, and mousse) and 77 side-dish and snack foods (braized·steam·roast products, broth, sauces, and snacks). Then, the adequacy of the nutritional content of these foods, focusing on protein and sodium, was evaluated according to product type. The 93 staple products and 77 side-dish products had average serving sizes of 163.27 g and 127.92 g, prices of $3.25 and $2.72, and energy contents of 295.25 kcal and 141.95 kcal, respectively. For staple foods, the energy content was significantly greater in cooked rice, but the protein content and index of nutrition quality (INQ) were significantly greater in mousse. There were no significant differences in sodium content or contribution to adequate intake (AI) by product type, but the sodium INQ was significantly greater in the mousse and porridge. For side-dish foods and snack products, the protein content, contribution to the recommended intake, and INQ were all significantly greater for the braized·steam·roast products. Sauces and braized·steam·roast products were significantly higher in sodium content and contribution to the AI, while broth was significantly higher in sodium INQ. These findings can be used to guide proper product selection and nutritional management that considers the health characteristics of health-vulnerable and elderly people.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. United Nations. World population prospects 2022. New York (NY): United Nations; 2022.
  2. Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Korea health statistics 2021: Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES IX-1). Cheongju: Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2023.
  3. Kim JH, Chon YH, Chang HJ. A study on the food security for low-income older adults: a case study on meals on wheels project in Seoul. J Korean Gerontol Soc 2020;40:617-38.
  4. Na W, Kim J, Kim H, Lee Y, Sohn C, et al. The relationship between nutrition status and risk of frailty in cognitive impaired elderly in Daycare Center (DC Center). J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 2021;50:88-94.
  5. Kim BK, Chun YG, Lee SH, Park DJ. Emerging technology and institution of foods for the elderly. Food Sci Ind 2015;48:28-36.
  6. Rosenberg IH. Sarcopenia: origins and clinical relevance. J Nutr 1997;127:990S-1S.
  7. Landi F, Calvani R, Cesari M, Tosato M, Martone AM, et al. Sarcopenia: an overview on current definitions, diagnosis and treatment. Curr Protein Pept Sci 2018;19:633-8.
  8. Sahni S, Mangano KM, Hannan MT, Kiel DP, McLean RR. Higher protein intake is associated with higher lean mass and quadriceps muscle strength in adult men and women. J Nutr 2015;145:1569-75.
  9. Ter Borg S, de Groot LC, Mijnarends DM, de Vries JH, Verlaan S, et al. Differences in nutrient intake and biochemical nutrient status between sarcopenic and nonsarcopenic older adults-results from the Maastricht Sarcopenia Study. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2016;17:393-401.
  10. Jeon S, Kim Y, Min S, Song M, Son S, et al. Taste sensitivity of elderly people is associated with quality of life and inadequate dietary intake. Nutrients 2021;13:1693.
  11. Malta D, Petersen KS, Johnson C, Trieu K, Rae S, et al. High sodium intake increases blood pressure and risk of kidney disease. From the science of salt: a regularly updated systematic review of salt and health outcomes (August 2016 to March 2017). J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2018;20:1654-65.
  12. Nan X, Lu H, Wu J, Xue M, Qian Y, et al. The interactive association between sodium intake, alcohol consumption and hypertension among elderly in northern China: a cross-sectional study. BMC Geriatr 2021;21:135.
  13. Shin EK, Lee HJ, Ahn MY, Lee YK. Study on the development and evaluation of validity of salty taste assessment tool. Korean J Nutr 2008;41:184-91.
  14. Ministry of Health and Welfare (KR); The Korean Nutrition Society. Dietary reference intakes for Koreans 2020. Sejong: Ministry of Health and Welfare; 2020.
  15. Lee HS, Nam YJ, Kim YE, Kim JC, Shin Y, et al. Policies and industrial technology trends for seniorfriendly foods. Food Sci Ind 2020;53:435-43.
  16. Noda R, Sano J. Ingestion-assisting oleaginous composition for person having difficulty in swallowing/masticating and food for person having difficulty in swallowing/masticating. Japan patent JP 5938161. 2016.
  17. Boo KW, Kim BG, Lee SJ. Physicochemical and sensory characteristics of enzymatically treated and texture modified elderly foods. Korean J Food Sci Technol 2020;5:495-502.
  18. Shin KE, Jun KW. A study on the manufacturing of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) mook for development of care food. Culin Sci Hosp Res 2020;26:51-61.
  19. Shin SJ, Hwang EH. Gender differences in the cognitive function and nutritional status in older age: a representative nationwide data of Korean elders. J Korean Public Health Nurs 2017;31:209-19.
  20. Zarei M, Qorbani M, Djalalinia S, Sulaiman N, Subashini T, et al. Food insecurity and dietary intake among elderly population: a systematic review. Int J Prev Med 2021;12:8.
  21. Choi MI, Mun SJ. Relationship among dietary intake ability, oral health status, and nutritional status in the elderly. Korean J Clin Dent Hyg 2018;6:29-40.
  22. Robinson SM, Reginster JY, Rizzoli R, Shaw SC, Kanis JA, et al. Does nutrition play a role in the prevention and management of sarcopenia? Clin Nutr 2018;37:1121-32.
  23. Choi MK, Kim NY, Lee YK, Heo YR, Hyun T, et al. Contribution of food groups to sodium and potassium intakes by their ratio in Korean adults. Prog Nutr 2019;21:285-93.