Clinical Endoscopy

  • 제57권5호
  • /
  • Pages.595-603
  • /
  • 2024
  • /
  • 2234-2400(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-2443(eISSN)
대한소화기내시경학회 (The Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Coaxial plastic stent placement within lumen-apposing metal stents for the management of pancreatic fluid collections: a systemic review and meta-analysis

  • 투고 : 2023.12.05
  • 심사 : 2024.01.19
  • 발행 : 2024.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Background/Aims: Coaxial placement of double pigtail plastic stents (DPPS) through lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs) is commonly performed to reduce the risk of LAMS obstruction, bleeding, and stent migration when used for the drainage of pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs). A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to compare the outcomes of LAMS alone and LAMS with coaxial DPPS placement in the management of PFCs. Methods: A systematic review was conducted to identify studies comparing LAMS and LAMS/DPPS for PFC drainage. Primary outcomes included the rate of clinical success, overall adverse events (AEs), bleeding, infection, occlusion, and stent migration. The pooled effect size was summarized using a random-effects model and compared between LAMS and LAMS/DPPS by calculating odds ratios (ORs). Results: Nine studies involving 709 patients were identified (338 on LAMS and 371 on LAMS/DPPS). LAMS/DPPS was associated with a reduced risk of stent obstruction (OR, 0.59; p=0.004) and infection (OR, 0.55; p=0.001). No significant differences were observed in clinical success (OR, 0.96; p=0.440), overall AEs (OR, 0.57; p=0.060), bleeding (OR, 0.61; p=0.120), or stent migration (OR, 1.03; p=0.480). Conclusions: Coaxial DPPS for LAMS drainage of PFCs is associated with a reduced risk of stent occlusion and infection; however, no difference was observed in the overall AE rates or bleeding.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Baron TH, DiMaio CJ, Wang AY, et al. American Gastroenterological Association clinical practice update: management of pancreatic necrosis. Gastroenterology 2020;158:67-75.  https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2019.07.064
  2. van Santvoort HC, Besselink MG, Bakker OJ, et al. A step-up approach or open necrosectomy for necrotizing pancreatitis. N Engl J Med 2010;362:1491-1502.  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0908821
  3. van Brunschot S, van Grinsven J, van Santvoort HC, et al. Endoscopic or surgical step-up approach for infected necrotising pancreatitis: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 2018;391:51-58.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32404-2
  4. Hollemans RA, Bakker OJ, Boermeester MA, et al. Superiority of step-up approach vs open necrosectomy in long-term follow-up of patients with necrotizing pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 2019;156:1016-1026.  https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2018.10.045
  5. ASGE Standards of Practice Committee, Muthusamy VR, Chandrasekhara V, et al. The role of endoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of inflammatory pancreatic fluid collections. Gastrointest Endosc 2016;83:481-488.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2015.11.027
  6. Keane MG, Sze SF, Cieplik N, et al. Endoscopic versus percutaneous drainage of symptomatic pancreatic fluid collections: a 14- year experience from a tertiary hepatobiliary centre. Surg Endosc 2016;30:3730-3740.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4668-x
  7. Khan MA, Hammad T, Khan Z, et al. Endoscopic versus percutaneous management for symptomatic pancreatic fluid collections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open 2018;6:E474-E483.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-102299
  8. Hookey LC, Debroux S, Delhaye M, et al. Endoscopic drainage of pancreatic-fluid collections in 116 patients: a comparison of etiologies, drainage techniques, and outcomes. Gastrointest Endosc 2006;63:635-643.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2005.06.028
  9. Chandrasekhara V, Elhanafi S, Storm AC, et al. Predicting the need for step-up therapy after EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections with lumen-apposing metal stents. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021;19:2192-2198.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2021.05.005
  10. Park DH, Lee SS, Moon SH, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided versus conventional transmural drainage for pancreatic pseudocysts: a prospective randomized trial. Endoscopy 2009;41:842-848.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1215133
  11. Siddiqui AA, Adler DG, Nieto J, et al. EUS-guided drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections and necrosis by using a novel lumen-apposing stent: a large retrospective, multicenter U.S. experience (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2016;83:699-707.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2015.10.020
  12. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. AXIOS Stent with Delivery System 510(k) K153088. 20998/S007 approval letter; 2015 [cited 2023 Oct 1]. Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf15/K153088.pdf 
  13. Shah RJ, Shah JN, Waxman I, et al. Safety and efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections with lumen-apposing covered self-expanding metal stents. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015;13:747-752.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2014.09.047
  14. Rinninella E, Kunda R, Dollhopf M, et al. EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections using a novel lumen-apposing metal stent on an electrocautery-enhanced delivery system: a large retrospective study (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2015;82:1039-1046.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2015.04.006
  15. Bang JY, Hasan M, Navaneethan U, et al. Lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) for pancreatic fluid collection (PFC) drainage: may not be business as usual. Gut 2017;66:2054-2056.  https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312812
  16. Chandrasekhara V, Barthet M, Deviere J, et al. Safety and efficacy of lumen-apposing metal stents versus plastic stents to treat walled-off pancreatic necrosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open 2020;8:E1639-E1653.  https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1243-0092
  17. Goff D, Lloyd-Jones D; Risk Assessment Working Group. Assessing cardiovascular risk: systematic evidence review from the Risk Assessment Work Group. United States Department of Health and Human Services/National Institutes of Health/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; 2013 [cited 2023 Oct 1]. Available from: https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/assessing-cardiovascular-risk 
  18. Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2011;343:d5928. 
  19. AbiMansour JP, Jaruvongvanich V, Velaga S, et al. Lumen-apposing metal stents with or without coaxial plastic stent placement for the management of pancreatic fluid collections. Gastrointest Endosc 2024;99:104-107.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2023.09.005
  20. Puga M, Consiglieri CF, Busquets J, et al. Safety of lumen-apposing stent with or without coaxial plastic stent for endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections: a retrospective study. Endoscopy 2018;50:1022-1026.  https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0582-9127
  21. Aburajab M, Smith Z, Khan A, et al. Safety and efficacy of lumen-apposing metal stents with and without simultaneous double-pigtail plastic stents for draining pancreatic pseudocyst. Gastrointest Endosc 2018;87:1248-1255.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2017.11.033
  22. Ali SE, Benrajab K, Mardini H, et al. Anchoring lumen-apposing metal stent with coaxial plastic stent for endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections: any benefit? Ann Gastroenterol 2019;32:620-625. 
  23. Haddad JD, Tielleman T, Fuller A, et al. Safety and efficacy of lumen-apposing metal stents with and without coaxial plastic stents for pancreatic fluid collections. Tech Innov Gastrointest Endosc 2023;25:113-118.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tige.2022.12.001
  24. Shamah SP, Sahakian AB, Chapman CG, et al. Double pigtail stent placement as an adjunct to lumen-apposing metal stentsfor drainage of pancreatic fluid collections may not affect outcomes: a multicenter experience. Endosc Ultrasound 2022;11:53-58.  https://doi.org/10.4103/EUS-D-21-00030
  25. Vanek P, Falt P, Vitek P, et al. EUS-guided transluminal drainage using lumen-apposing metal stents with or without coaxial plastic stents for treatment of walled-off necrotizing pancreatitis: a prospective bicentric randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2023;97:1070-1080.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2022.12.026
  26. Aujla P, Aleem A, Subramanian SK, et al. Stent within a stent: when lumen apposing metal stent meets its match in coaxial double pigtail stent. Gastrointest Endosc 2023;97:AB920. 
  27. Perez Estrada C, Adalberto R. Efficacy and safety of lumen-apposing metal stents in endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of abdominal fluid collections and the influence of inserting a coaxial double pigtail plastic stent. United Eur Gastroenterol J 2022;10(Suppl 8):984-985. 
  28. Gluck M, Ross A, Irani S, et al. Dual modality drainage for symptomatic walled-off pancreatic necrosis reduces length of hospitalization, radiological procedures, and number of endoscopies compared to standard percutaneous drainage. J Gastrointest Surg 2012;16:248-257.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-011-1759-4
  29. Varadarajulu S, Phadnis MA, Christein JD, et al. Multiple transluminal gateway technique for EUS-guided drainage of symptomatic walled-off pancreatic necrosis. Gastrointest Endosc 2011;74:74-80.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1122
  30. Bakker OJ, van Santvoort HC, van Brunschot S, et al. Endoscopic transgastric vs surgical necrosectomy for infected necrotizing pancreatitis: a randomized trial. JAMA 2012;307:1053-1061.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2012.276
  31. Varadarajulu S, Bang JY, Sutton BS, et al. Equal efficacy of endoscopic and surgical cystogastrostomy for pancreatic pseudocyst drainage in a randomized trial. Gastroenterology 2013;145:583-590.  https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2013.05.046
  32. Penn DE, Draganov PV, Wagh MS, et al. Prospective evaluation of the use of fully covered self-expanding metal stents for EUS-guided transmural drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts. Gastrointest Endosc 2012;76:679-684.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2012.04.457
  33. Bang JY, Mel Wilcox C, Arnoletti JP, et al. Importance of disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome in recurrence of pancreatic fluid collections initially drained using lumen-apposing metal stents. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021;19:1275-1281.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2020.07.022
  34. van Dijk SM, Timmerhuis HC, Verdonk RC, et al. Treatment of disrupted and disconnected pancreatic duct in necrotizing pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pancreatology 2019;19:905-915.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pan.2019.08.006
  35. Wang L, Elhanafi S, Storm AC, et al. Impact of disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome on endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections. Endoscopy 2021;53:603-610.  https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1213-1489
  36. Giri S, Harindranath S, Afzalpurkar S, et al. Does a coaxial double pigtail stent reduce adverse events after lumen apposing metal stent placement for pancreatic fluid collections? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ther Adv Gastrointest Endosc 2023;16:26317745231199364. 
  37. Lang GD, Fritz C, Bhat T, et al. EUS-guided drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections with lumen-apposing metal stents and plastic double-pigtail stents: comparison of efficacy and adverse event rates. Gastrointest Endosc 2018;87:150-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2017.06.029
  38. Dayyeh BK, Chandrasekhara V, Shah RJ, et al. Combined drainage and protocolized necrosectomy through a coaxial lumen-apposing metal stent for pancreatic walled-off necrosis: a prospective multicenter trial. Ann Surg 2023;277:e1072-e1080. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000005274