Anatomy and Cell Biology

  • 제57권3호
  • /
  • Pages.370-377
  • /
  • 2024
  • /
  • 2093-3665(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2093-3673(eISSN)
대한해부학회 (Korean Association of Anatomists)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Challenging arterial pattern of foregut and its potential impact on surgery

  • 투고 : 2024.03.25
  • 심사 : 2024.05.09
  • 발행 : 2024.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Anticipating a wide range of morphological variations of arterial anatomy of foregut derivatives beyond the classical pattern, a precise understanding is pertinent to preoperative diagnosis, operative procedure and to avoid potentially devastating post-operative outcome during various traumatic and non-traumatic vascular insult of foregut. The study aimed to revisit the morphological details and update unusual configurations of arteries of foregut to establish clinico-anatomical correlations. This study described the detailed branching pattern of coeliac trunk (CT) as principal artery of foregut with source & course of hepatic, gastric, duodenal and pancreatic branches in 58 cadaveric dissections. Based on morphology, different types and subtypes were made. The descriptions were explained using figures and pertinent tables. Among classical branches of CT, splenic artery was found as most stable whereas other two branches were found to be most variable with missing common hepatic artery in 11 cases. In addition to classical trifurcation (65.52%), different types of bifurcation (12.07%) and tetrafurcations (22.41%) of CT were observed. Regarding variations of hepatic arteries (27.59%), both non-classical origin and accessory hepatic branches were found. In case of gastric branches, more variant origins were seen with right gastric (50%) as compared to left gastric artery (34.48%). Other morphological variations included non-classical origin of gastro-duodenal artery (18.96%) along with presence of accessory pancreatic (17.13%) and duodenal arteries (6.38%). Awareness of anatomical variations regarding circulatory dynamics of foregut is worth knowing in order to facilitate successful planning of surgery involving upper abdominal organs with least complications.

키워드

과제정보

Authors sincerely thank those who donated their bodies to Department of Anatomy and gave consent to conduct studies for anatomical research purposes. We also acknowledge the great help received from Department of Anatomy.

참고문헌

  1. Hemamalini. Variations in the branching pattern of the celiac trunk and its clinical significance. Anat Cell Biol 2018;51:143-9.  https://doi.org/10.5115/acb.2018.51.3.143
  2. Standring S, Gray H. Gray's anatomy: the anatomical basis of clinical practice. 40th ed. Churchill Livingstone/Elsevier; 2008. 
  3. Walker TG. Mesenteric vasculature and collateral pathways. Semin Intervent Radiol 2009;26:167-74.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1225663
  4. Ochoa JE, Pointer DT Jr, Hamner JB. Vascular anomalies in pancreaticoduodenectomy: a lesson learned. Case Rep Surg 2016;2016:5792980. 
  5. Malviya KK, Verma A, Nayak AK, Mishra A, More RS. Unraveling variations in celiac trunk and hepatic artery by CT angiography to aid in surgeries of upper abdominal region. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021;11:2262. 
  6. Jalamneh B, Nassar IJ, Sabbooba L, Ghanem R, Nazzal Z, Kiwan R, Awadghanem A, Maree M. Exploring anatomical variations of abdominal arteries through computed tomography: classification, prevalence and implications. Cureus 2023;15:e41380. 
  7. Zaki SM, Abdelmaksoud AHK, Khaled BEA, Abdel Kader IA. Anatomical variations of hepatic artery using the multidetector computed tomography angiography. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 2020;79:247-54.  https://doi.org/10.5603/FM.a2019.0090
  8. Hiatt JR, Gabbay J, Busuttil RW. Surgical anatomy of the hepatic arteries in 1000 cases. Ann Surg 1994;220:50-2.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199407000-00008
  9. Michels NA. Newer anatomy of the liver and its variant blood supply and collateral circulation. Am J Surg 1966;112:337-47.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9610(66)90201-7
  10. Ande T, Makani TK, Nannam K, Velichety SD, Kumar JA. Left gastric artery variants: a cadaveric, postmortem and radiological investigation. Scr Med 2023;54:157-61. 
  11. Mazurek A, Juszczak A, Walocha JA, Pasternak A. Rare combined variations of the coeliac trunk, accessory hepatic and gastric arteries with co-occurrence of double cystic arteries. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 2021;80:460-6.  https://doi.org/10.5603/FM.a2020.0052
  12. Wu X, Kang J, Liu Y, Sun G, Shi Y, Niu J. A rare hepatic artery variant reporting and a new classification. Front Surg 2022;9:1003350. 
  13. Ugurel MS, Battal B, Bozlar U, Nural MS, Tasar M, Ors F, Saglam M, Karademir I. Anatomical variations of hepatic arterial system, coeliac trunk and renal arteries: an analysis with multidetector CT angiography. Br J Radiol 2010;83:661-7.  https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/21236482
  14. Haller AV. [Anatomical icons with which some of the main parts of the human body are outlined are presented & the arteries especially the history is contained]. Vandenhoeck; 1756. Latin. 
  15. Adachi B. [The Arterial System of the Japanese]. Kaiserlich-Japanischen Universitat zu Kyoto, Maruzen Publishing Co; 1928. Japanese. 
  16. Agarwal S, Pangtey B, Vasudeva N. Unusual variation in the branching pattern of the celiac trunk and its embryological and clinical perspective. J Clin Diagn Res 2016;10:AD05-7. 
  17. Sadler TW. Cardiovascular system. In: Sadler TW, editor. Langman's Medical Embryology. 12th ed. Wolters Kluwer; 2012. p.189. 
  18. Chitra R. Clinically relevant variations of the coeliac trunk. Singapore Med J 2010;51:216-9. 
  19. Juszczak A, Mazurek A, Walocha JA, Pasternak A. Coeliac trunk and its anatomic variations: a cadaveric study. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 2021;80:114-21.  https://doi.org/10.5603/FM.a2020.0042
  20. Mburu KS, Alexander OJ, Hassan S, Bernard N. Variations in the branching pattern of the celiac trunk in a Kenyan population. Int J Morphol 2010;28:199-204. 
  21. Panagouli E, Venieratos D, Lolis E, Skandalakis P. Variations in the anatomy of the celiac trunk: a systematic review and clinical implications. Ann Anat 2013;195:501-11.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2013.06.003
  22. Pinal-Garcia DF, Nuno-Guzman CM, Gonzalez-Gonzalez ME, Ibarra-Hurtado TR. The celiac trunk and its anatomical variations: a cadaveric study. J Clin Med Res 2018;10:321-9.  https://doi.org/10.14740/jocmr3356w
  23. Santos PVD, Barbosa ABM, Targino VA, Silva NA, Silva YCM, Barbosa F, Oliveira ASB, Assis TO. Anatomical variations of the celiac trunk: a systematic review. Arq Bras Cir Dig 2018;31:e1403. 
  24. Srivastava AK, Sehgal G, Sharma PK, Kumar N, Singh R, Parihar A, Aga P. Various types of branching patterns of celiac trunk. FASEB J 2012;26(Suppl 1):722.5. 
  25. Sureka B, Mittal MK, Mittal A, Sinha M, Bhambri NK, Thukral BB. Variations of celiac axis, common hepatic artery and its branches in 600 patients. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2013;23:223-33.  https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-3026.120273
  26. Torres K, Staskiewicz G, Denisow M, Pietrzyk L, Torres A, Szukala M, Czekajska-Chehab E, Drop A. Anatomical variations of the coeliac trunk in the homogeneous Polish population. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 2015;74:93-9.  https://doi.org/10.5603/FM.2014.0059
  27. Venieratos D, Panagouli E, Lolis E, Tsaraklis A, Skandalakis P. A morphometric study of the celiac trunk and review of the literature. Clin Anat 2013;26:741-50.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.22136
  28. Huang Y, Mu GC, Qin XG, Chen ZB, Lin JL, Zeng YJ. Study of celiac artery variations and related surgical techniques in gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2015;21:6944-51.  https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i22.6944
  29. Cirocchi R, D'Andrea V, Amato B, Renzi C, Henry BM, Tomaszewski KA, Gioia S, Lancia M, Artico M, Randolph J. Aberrant left hepatic arteries arising from left gastric arteries and their clinical importance. Surgeon 2020;18:100-12.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2019.06.002
  30. van den Hoven AF, Smits ML, de Keizer B, van Leeuwen MS, van den Bosch MA, Lam MG. Identifying aberrant hepatic arteries prior to intra-arterial radioembolization. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2014;37:1482-93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-014-0845-x