DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Survivability and Growth Performance of Sal (Shorea robusta C.F. Gaertn) with Compatible Associated and Naturally Grown Tropical Timber Tree Species in a Field Experiment at Madhupur Sal Forest, Bangladesh

  • Received : 2023.04.13
  • Accepted : 2024.06.28
  • Published : 2024.09.30

Abstract

This study aimed to develop a mixed plantation strategy, with Sal (Shorea robusta) as the primary tree species, along with four associated and two naturally grown tree species. Using a randomized complete block design (RCBD), the field experiment involved a control group (mono plantation) and three mixed plantation groups, each replicated four times, totaling 80 replicates (40 in 2019 and 40 in 2020). Survival rate, height and collar diameter growth of seedlings were recorded in both mono and mixed plots in July 2021. Statistical analyses, including one-way ANOVA on means from three replicate plots (p<0.05) and a Tukey HSD test, were conducted to assess differences between treatments. Significant differences in survival rates were found among mono plantations, with TMono04 showing the highest survival rate (88% to 91%). However, there were no significant differences in survival rates among seedlings in mixed plantations. Notably, survival rates were lower in mono plantations compared to mixed plantations. Mono plantations showed significant differences in height growth across both 2019 and 2020 plots, with TMono05 achieving the highest height growth (101.1 cm to 123.6 cm). Similarly, mixed plantations showed significant differences in height growth, with TMixed7 displaying the most substantial growth (116.4 cm to 138.2 cm). Overall, mixed plantations showed greater height growth compared to mono plantations. Significant variations in collar diameter growth were noted in both the 2019 and 2020 mono plantation plots, with TMono01 showing the highest growth (10.2 mm to 11.1 mm). Similarly, among mixed plantations, a significant difference in collar diameter growth was observed, with TMixed4 exhibiting the highest growth (10.4 mm to 13.1 mm). Overall, mixed plantations showed higher collar diameter growth compared to mono plantations. The findings suggest that planting Sal trees alongside compatible associated and naturally grown tree species in the Sal forests is preferable over establishing mono plantations.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahmed ZU, Begum ZNT, Hassan MA, Khondker M, Kabir SMH, Ahmad M, Ahmed ATA, Rahman AKA, Haque EU. 2008a. Encyclopedia of Flora and Fauna of Bangladesh. Volume 6. Angiosperms: Dicotyledons: Acanthaceae-Asteraceae. Asiatic Society of Bangladesh, Dhaka. 
  2. Ahmed ZU, Hassan MA, Begum ZNT, Khondker M, Kabir SMH, Ahmad M, Ahmed ATA, Rahman AKA, Haque EU. 2008b. Encyclopedia of Flora and Fauna of Bangladesh Volume 7. Angiosperms: Dicotyledons: Balsaminaceae-Euphorbiaceae. Asiatic Society of Bangladesh, Dhaka. 
  3. Ahmed ZU, Hassan MA, Begum ZNT, Khondker M, Kabir SMH, Ahmad M, Ahmed ATA, Rahman AKA, Haque EU. 2009a. Encyclopedia of Flora and Fauna of Bangladesh. Volume 8. Angiosperms: Dicotyledons: Fabaceae-Lythraceae. Asiatic Society of Bangladesh, Dhaka. 
  4. Ahmed ZU, Hassan MA, Begum ZNT, Khondker M, Kabir SMH, Ahmad M, Ahmed ATA. 2009b. Encyclopedia of Flora and Fauna of Bangladesh. Volume 9. Angiosperms: Dicotyledons: Magnoliaceae-Punicaceae. Asiatic Society of Bangladesh, Dhaka. 
  5. Alam M, Furukawa Y, Sarker SK, Ahmed R. 2008. Sustainability of Sal (Shorea robusta) Forest in Bangladesh: Past, Present and Future Actions. Int For Rev 10: 29-37. 
  6. Alam MK. 1995. Diversity in the Woody Flora of Sal (Shorea robusta) Forests of Bangladesh. Bangladesh J For Sci 24: 41-51. 
  7. Basak SR, Alam MK. 2016. Annotated Checklist of the Tree Flora of Bangladesh. Bangladesh J Plant Taxon 23: 261-262. 
  8. Bauhus J, van der Meer P, Kanninen M. 2010. Ecosystem Goods and Services from Plantation Forests. Earthscan, London. 
  9. Chitale VS, Behera MD. 2012. Can the Distribution of Sal (Shorea Robusta Gaertn. f.) Shift in the Northeastern Direction in India Due to Changing Climate? Curr Sci 102: 1126-1135. 
  10. Deb JC, Phinn S, Butt N, McAlpine CA. 2017. The Impact of Climate Change on the Distribution of Two Threatened Dipterocarp Trees. Ecol Evol 7: 2238-2248. 
  11. Dutta S, Hossain MK. 2017. Effects of Mixed Plantation on Growth and Biomass Yield of Two Common Plantation Trees of Bangladesh. J For Environ Sci 33: 22-32. 
  12. Dutta S, Hossain MK. 2018. Species Interactions, Initial Growth Performance and Biomass Productivity of Acacia auriculiformis and Swietenia macrophylla in Tropical Mixed Plantations. J Agric Nat Resour Sci 5: 29-42. 
  13. FAO. 2018. Terms and Definitions: Forest Resources Assessment (FRA) 2020. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. 
  14. FAO. 2020. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2020: Main Report. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. 
  15. Forrester DI, Bauhus J, Cowie AL, Vanclay JK. 2006. Mixed-species Plantations of Eucalyptus with Nitrogen-fixing Trees: A Review. For Ecol Manag 233: 211-230. 
  16. Gautam KH, Devoe NN. 2006. Ecological and Anthropogenic Niches of Sal (Shorea robusta Gaertn. f.) Forest and Prospects for Multiple-product Forest Management - A Review. For Int J For Res 79: 81-101. 
  17. GoB. 2019. Tree and Forest Resources of Bangladesh: Report on the Bangladesh Forest Inventory. Forest Department, Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, Dhaka. 
  18. He Y, Qin L, Li Z, Liang X, Shao M, Tan L. 2013. Carbon Storage Capacity of Monoculture and Mixed-species Plantations in Subtropical China. For Ecol Manag 295: 193-198. 
  19. Hossain MK, Islam SA, Zashimuddin M, Tarafdar MA, Islam QN. 1997. Growth and Biomass Production of some Acacia and Eucalyptus Species in Degenerated Sal Forest Areas of Bangladesh. Indian For 123: 211-217. 
  20. Hua F, Wang L, Fisher B, Zheng X, Wang X, Yu DW, Tang Y, Zhu J, Wilcove DS. 2018. Tree Plantations Displacing Native Forests: The Nature and Drivers of Apparent Forest Recovery on Former Croplands in Southwestern China from 2000 to 2015. Biol Conserv 222: 113-124. 
  21. Kanowski J, Catterall CP. 2010. Carbon Stocks in Above-ground Biomass of Monoculture Plantations, Mixed Species Plantations and Environmental Restoration Plantings in North-East Australia. Ecol Manag Restor 11: 119-126. 
  22. Kanowski J, Catterall CP, Wardell-Johnson GW. 2005. Consequences of Broadscale Timber Plantations for Biodiversity in Cleared Rainforest Landscapes of Tropical and Subtropical Australia. For Ecol Manag 208: 359-372. 
  23. Liu CLC, Kuchma O, Krutovsky KV. 2018. Mixed-species Versus Monocultures in Plantation Forestry: Development, Benefits, Ecosystem Services and Perspectives for the Future. Glob Ecol Conserv 15: e00419. 
  24. Mishra A, Humpenoder F, Dietrich JP, Bodirsky BL, Sohngen B, Reyer CPO, Lotze-Campen H, Popp A. 2021. Estimating Global Land System Impacts of Timber Plantations Using MAgPIE 4.3.5. Geosci Model Dev 14: 6467-6494. 
  25. Montagnini F, Cusack D, Petit B, Kanninen M. 2004. Environmental Services of Native Tree Plantations and Agroforestry Systems in Central America. J Sustain For 21: 51-67. 
  26. Nguyen H, Herbohn J, Clendenning J, Lamb D, Dressler W, Vanclay J, Firn J. 2015. What is the Available Evidence Concerning Relative Performance of Different Designs of Mixed-species Plantings for Smallholder and Community Forestry in the Tropics? A Systematic Map Protocol. Environ Evid 4: 15. 
  27. Nishat A, Huq SM, Imamul B, Shuvashish P, Khan AHMR, Moniruzzaman AS. 2002. Bio-ecological Zones of Bangladesh. IUCN Publication, Dhaka, pp 54-55. 
  28. Pasha MK, Uddin SB. 2013. Dictionary of Plant Names of Bangladesh (Vascular Plants). Janokalyan Prokashani, Chittagong. 
  29. Petit B, Montagnini F. 2006. Growth in Pure and Mixed Plantations of Tree Species Used in Reforesting Rural Areas of the Humid Region of Costa Rica, Central America. For Ecol Manag 233: 338-343. 
  30. Piotto D. 2008. A Meta-analysis Comparing Tree Growth in Monocultures and Mixed Plantations. For Ecol Manag 255: 781-786. 
  31. Plants of the World Online. 2022. Shorea robusta C.F. Gaertn. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:321425-1. Accessed 6 Mar 2023. 
  32. Pretzsch H, Schutze G. 2016. Effect of Tree Species Mixing on the Size Structure, Density, and Yield of Forest Stands. Eur J For Res 135: 1-22. 
  33. Rahman M, Nishat A, Vacik H. 2009. Anthropogenic Disturbances and Plant Diversity of the Madhupur Sal forests (Shorea robusta C.F. Gaertn) of Bangladesh. Int J Biodivers Sci Manag 5: 162-173. 
  34. Rahman MH, Bahauddin M. 2018. Physicochemical Properties of Soil as Affected by Land Use Change in a Tropical Forest Ecosystem of Northeastern Bangladesh. Proc Pak Acad Sci B Life Environ Sci 55: 71-84. 
  35. Rahman MH, Bahauddin M, Khan MASA, Islam MJ, Uddin MB. 2012. Assessment of Soil Physical Properties Under Plantation and Deforested Sites in a Biodiversity Conservation Area of North-Eastern Bangladesh. Int J Environ Sci 3: 1079-1088. 
  36. Rahman MM. 2003. Sal forest. In: Banglapedia : National Encyclopedia of Bangladesh. vol.9. (Islam S, Miah S, eds). Asiatic Society of Bangladesh, Dhaka, pp 28-29. 
  37. Rahman MM. 2021. Sal Forest. https://en.banglapedia.org/index.php/Sal_Forest. Accessed 10 Feb 2023. 
  38. Rahman MM, Rahman MM, Guogang Z, Islam KS. 2010. A Review of the Present Threats to Tropical Moist Deciduous Sal (Shorea Robusta) Forest Ecosystem of Central Bangladesh. Trop Conserv Sci 3: 90-102. 
  39. Rahman MR, Hossain MK, Hossain MA. 2019. Diversity and Composition of Tree Species in Madhupur National Park, Tangail, Bangladesh. J For Environ Sci 35: 159-172. 
  40. Rahman MR, Hossain MK, Hossain MA, Haque MS. 2017. Floristic Composition of Madhupur National Park (MNP), Tangail, Bangladesh. Bangladesh Agric 7: 27-45. 
  41. Rashid MM. 2001. Agroecological Characteristics of Bangladesh. In: Agricultural Research in Bangladesh in the 20th Century (Mian MAW, Maniruzzaman FM, Sattar MA, Miah MAA, Paul SK, Haque KR, eds). Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council & Bangladesh Academy of Agriculture, Dhaka, pp 37-42. 
  42. Richards AE, Forrester DI, Bauhus J, Scherer-Lorenzen M. 2010. The Influence of Mixed Tree Plantations on the Nutrition of Individual Species: A Review. Tree Physiol 30: 1192-1208. 
  43. Roy B, Rahman H, Fardusi MJ. 2012. Impact of Banana Based Agroforestry on Degraded Sal Forest (Shorea robusta C.F. Gaertn) of Bangladesh: A Study from Madhupur National Park. J Biodivers Ecol Sci 2: 63-72. 
  44. Singh G, Singh B, Kuppusamy V, Bala N. 2002. Variations in Foliage and Soil Nutrient Composition in Acacia tortilis Plantation of Different Ages in North-Western Rajasthan. Indian For 128: 514-522. 
  45. Swaminathan MS, Kochhar SL. 2019. Major Flowering Trees of Tropical Gardens. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, pp 39-40. 
  46. Zhang Y, Chen HYH, Reich PB. 2012. Forest Productivity Increases with Evenness, Species Richness and Trait Variation: A Global Meta-Analysis. J Ecol 100: 742-749.