DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Treatment, Education, and Prognosis of Slow Learners (Borderline Intelligence)

  • So Hee Lee (Department of Psychiatry, National Medical Center)
  • 투고 : 2024.04.22
  • 심사 : 2024.05.21
  • 발행 : 2024.07.01

초록

Objectives: Borderline intelligence has been excluded from formal diagnostic systems and not included in disability diagnoses, leaving gaps in treatment, education, and social welfare despite various functional impairments. Therefore, we aimed to shed light on ways to enhance the intelligence and functioning of individuals with borderline intelligence by reviewing research on its progression, education, and treatment. Methods: Ten studies that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in the final literature review and analyzed according to detailed topics (participant characteristics, design, and results). Results: Borderline intelligence is associated with various comorbid conditions, such as anxiety, depression, attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and addictive disorders, which negatively impact its course and prognosis. Individuals with borderline intelligence often face challenges in academics, employment, interpersonal relationships, and health owing to lifelong cognitive impairments. The treatment of borderline intelligence necessitates addressing environmental factors, such as neglect and abuse, as well as treating comorbid mental disorders, which are crucial for prognosis. Tailoring treatment programs for cognitive profile characteristics have been proposed, and studies have reported the effectiveness of pharmacotherapy, working memory training, and intensive rehabilitation training. Therefore, early intervention during childhood brain development is necessary. Risk factors, such as lack of parental education, and their impact on treatment outcomes have also been reported. Conclusion: Extensive research is needed on education, treatment, and prognosis related to borderline intelligence. Active intervention for children with borderline intelligence is essential to improve their functioning and quality of life.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Wieland J, Zitman FG. It is time to bring borderline intellectual functioning back into the main fold of classification systems. BJPsych Bull 2016;40:204-206. 
  2. Peltopuro M, Ahonen T, Kaartinen J, Seppala H, Narhi V. Borderline intellectual functioning: a systematic literature review. Intellect Dev Disabil 2014;52:419-443. 
  3. Fernell E, Gillberg C. Borderline intellectual functioning. Handb Clin Neurol 2020;174:77-81. 
  4. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed. Arlington: American Psychiatric Association;2013. 
  5. Jankowska AM, Lockiewicz M, Lada-Masko AB. Heterogeneity of cognitive profiles in students with borderline intellectual functioning. Psychiatr Pol 2021;55:869-885. 
  6. Gigi K, Werbeloff N, Goldberg S, Portuguese S, Reichenberg A, Fruchter E, et al. Borderline intellectual functioning is associated with poor social functioning, increased rates of psychiatric diagnosis and drug use--a cross sectional population based study. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2014;24:1793-1797. 
  7. Shaw SR. An educational programming framework for a subset of students with diverse learning needs: borderline intellectual functioning. Interv Sch Clin 2008;43:291-299. 
  8. Baglio G, Blasi V, Sangiuliano Intra F, Castelli I, Massaro D, Baglio F, et al. Social competence in children with borderline intellectual functioning: delayed development of theory of mind across all complexity levels. Front Psychol 2016;7:1604. 
  9. Aman MG, Buican B, Arnold LE. Methylphenidate treatment in children with borderline IQ and mental retardation: analysis of three aggregated studies. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 2003;13:29-40. 
  10. Luteijn I, VanDerNagel JEL, van Duijvenbode N, de Haan HA, Poelen EAP, Didden R. Post-traumatic stress disorder and substance use disorder in individuals with mild intellectual disability or borderline intellectual functioning: a review of treatment studies. Res Dev Disabil 2020;105:103753. 
  11. Roording-Ragetlie SL, Pieters S, Wennekers E, Klip H, Buitelaar J, Slaats-Willemse D. Working memory training in children with neurodevelopmental disorders and intellectual disabilities, the role of coaching: a double-blind randomised controlled trial. J Intellect Disabil Res 2023;67:842-859. 
  12. Van der Molen MJ, Van Luit JE, Van der Molen MW, Klugkist I, Jongmans MJ. Effectiveness of a computerised working memory training in adolescents with mild to borderline intellectual disabilities. J Intellect Disabil Res 2010;54:433-447. 
  13. Blasi V, Zanette M, Baglio G, Giangiacomo A, Di Tella S, Canevini MP, et al. Intervening on the developmental course of children with borderline intellectual functioning with a multimodal intervention: results from a randomized controlled trial. Front Psychol 2020;11:679. 
  14. Nestler J, Goldbeck L. A pilot study of social competence group training for adolescents with borderline intellectual functioning and emotional and behavioural problems (SCT-ABI). J Intellect Disabil Res 2011;55:231-241. 
  15. Bagner DM, Graziano PA. Barriers to success in parent training for young children with developmental delay: the role of cumulative risk. Behav Modif 2013;37:356-377.