Korean Journal of Community Nutrition (대한지역사회영양학회지)

The Korean Society of Community Nutrition (대한지역사회영양학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Exploring the customer perceived value of online grocery shopping: a cross-sectional study of Korean and Chinese consumers using Means-End Chain theory

  • Xinyu Jiang (Department of Foods and Nutrition, Kookmin University) ;
  • Hyo Bin Im (Department of Foods and Nutrition, Kookmin University) ;
  • Min A Lee (Department of Foods and Nutrition, Kookmin University)
  • Received : 2024.07.26
  • Accepted : 2024.08.18
  • Published : 2024.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objectives: Despite the growing market share of online grocery shopping, there is a need to understand customer perceived value due to the ongoing advancements in information technology. This study explores the connections between attributes, consequences, and values. Additionally, it conducts a cross-country comparison of consumers' online grocery shopping behaviors to gain a deeper understanding of consumer market segments and any potential variations among them. Methods: Data was collected through an online questionnaire survey conducted from May 1 to 15, 2024, targeting 400 consumers in Seoul, Korea, and Shanghai, China, who have experience with online grocery shopping. The survey utilized the Means-End Chain theory and association pattern technique hard laddering. Data collation and analysis were conducted using the IBM SPSS Statistics 28.0 program. The LadderUX software was employed to analyze the links between attributes, consequences, and values and create the consumer purchasing process's implication matrix and hierarchical value map (HVM). Results: The study identified key attributes that influence online grocery shopping decisions, including delivery service, price, freshness, and quality. Korean consumers demonstrated a higher sensitivity to price (19.0%) and delivery service (17.0%). In contrast, Chinese consumers prioritized delivery service (15.0%) and after-sales service (14.8%). Commonly cited consequences included time saving (12.6% for Koreans, 11.3% for Chinese), whereas prevalent values encompassed convenience (36.8% for Koreans, 19.6% for Chinese) and economic value (26.6% for Koreans, 14.7% for Chinese). The HVM underscored these insights, highlighting diverse consumer preferences and country-specific nuances. Conclusions: The findings highlight the current state of online food consumption and consumers' value systems, revealing variations among countries. These findings offer empirical insights that can be used to create customized global marketing strategies that resonate with various consumer preferences and market dynamics.

Keywords

References

  1. Lee MS. A qualitative study on consumer's online food purchase experience and the influencing factors of purchase and user satisfaction. [master's thesis]. Yonsei University; 2022. 
  2. Xi G, Zhen F, Cao X, Xu F. The interaction between e-shopping and store shopping: empirical evidence from Nanjing, China. Transp Lett 2020; 12(3): 157-165. 
  3. Chevalier S. Retail e-commerce sales worldwide from 2014 to 2027 [Internet]. Statista; 2024 [cited 2024 Jul 10]. Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/379046/world-wide-retail-e-commerce-sales/ 
  4. Gielens K, Steenkamp JBEM. Branding in the era of digital (dis)intermediation. Int J Res Mark 2019; 36(3): 367-384. 
  5. Kim H. Use of mobile grocery shopping application: motivation and decision-making process among South Korean consumers. J Theor Appl Electron Commer Res 2021; 16(7): 2672-2693. 
  6. KOrean Statistical Information Service (KOSIS). Transaction value of online shopping mall by commodity groups/sales channel [Internet]. KOSIS; 2024 [cited 2024 Aug 7]. Available from: https://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=101&tblId=DT_1KE10071&conn_path=I2&language=en 
  7. Ministry of Commerce of the People's Republic of China. [China online retail market development report 2023] [Internet]. Ministry of Commerce of the People's Republic of China; 2023 [cited 2024 Aug 8]. Available from: https://cif.mofcom.gov.cn/cif/html/upload/20240313102933492_2023%E5%B9%B4%E4%B8%AD%E5%9B%BD%E7%BD%91%E7%BB%9C%E9%9B%B6%E5%94%AE%E5%B8%82%E5%9C%BA%E5%8F%91%E5%B1%95%E6%8A%A5%E5%91%8A.pdf. Chinese. 
  8. ECRC. [The scale of the fresh food e-commerce market will approach 650 billion yuan in 2023, and the total financing amount will drop by more than 70% year-on-year] [Internet]. ECRC; 2024 [cited 2024 Aug 8]. Available from: https://www.100ec.cn/detail--6638102.html. Chinese. 
  9. Mortimer G, Fazal HS, Martin J. Online grocery shopping: the impact of shopping frequency on perceived risk. Int Rev Retail Distribution Consum Res 2016; 26(2): 202-223. 
  10. Ramus K, Asger Nielsen N. Online grocery retailing: what do consumers think? Internet Res 2005; 15(3): 335-352. 
  11. Frank DA, Peschel AO. Sweetening the deal: the ingredients that drive consumer adoption of online grocery shopping. J Food Prod Mark 2020; 26(8): 535-544. 
  12. Hsiao C, Ju Rebecca Yen H, Li EY. Exploring consumer value of multi-channel shopping: a perspective of means-end theory. Internet Res 2012; 22(3): 318-339. 
  13. Nguyen TH, Ngo HQ, Duong TT, Adeola O. Motivations influencing virtual supermarket shopping: an exploratory study using means-end chains analysis. Cogent Bus Manag 2021; 8(1): 1954491. 
  14. Zeithaml VA. Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence. J Mark 1988; 52(3): 2-22. 
  15. Monroe KB, Chapman JD. Framing effects on buyers' subjective product evaluations. Advances Consum Res 1987; 14(1): 193-197. 
  16. Hsin Chang H, Wang H. The moderating effect of customer perceived value on online shopping behavior. Online Inf Rev 2011; 35(3): 333-359. 
  17. Mohd-Any AA, Winklhofer H, Ennew C. Measuring users' value experience on a travel website (e-value): what value is cocreated by the user? J Travel Res 2015; 54(4): 496-510. 
  18. Dastane O, Goi CL, Rabbanee FK. The development and validation of a scale to measure perceived value of mobile commerce (MVAL-SCALE). J Retail Consum Serv 2023; 71: 103222. 
  19. Chen Z, Dubinsky AJ. A conceptual model of perceived customer value in e-commerce: a preliminary investigation. Psychol Mark 2003; 20(4): 323-347. 
  20. Choi J, Jang S, Choi JY. Determinants of selection behavior in online distribution channels for fresh food. Int J Consum Stud 2022; 46(6): 2318-2332. 
  21. Zheng Q, Chen J, Zhang R, Wang HH. What factors affect Chinese consumers' online grocery shopping? Product attributes, e-vendor characteristics and consumer perceptions. China Agric Econ Rev 2020; 12(2): 193-213.
  22. Wang HH, Han X, Jiang Y, Wu G. Revealed consumers' preferences for fresh produce attributes in Chinese online markets: a case of domestic and imported apples. PLoS One 2022; 17(6): e0270257. 
  23. Costa AIA, Dekker M, Jongen WMF. An overview of means-end theory: potential application in consumer-oriented food product design. Trends Food Sci Technol 2004; 15(7-8): 403-415. 
  24. Reynolds TJ, Olson JC. Understanding consumer decision making. Routledge; 2001. p. 1-466. 
  25. Sankaran R, Chakraborty S. Why customers make mobile payments? Applying a means-end chain approach. Mark Intell Plan 2021; 39(1): 109-124. 
  26. Al-Abdullatif AM, Aladsani HK. Understanding instructors' cognitive structure toward the academic use of social network sites: the means-end chain theory. Sage Open 2021; 11(3): 21582440211029927. 
  27. Wen J, Huang S. Chinese tourists' motivations of visiting a highly volatile destination: a means-end approach. Tour Recreat Res 2019; 45(1): 80-93. 
  28. Jeng MY, Yeh TM, Pai FY. Analyzing older adults' perceived values of using smart bracelets by means-end chain. Healthcare (Basel) 2020; 8(4): 494. 
  29. Bradburn NM, Sudman S, Wansink B. Asking questions: the definitive guide to questionnaire design -- for market research, political polls, and social and health questionnaires. 2nd ed. Jossey-Bass; 2004. p. 21-29. 
  30. Russell CG, Flight I, Leppard P, van Lawick van Pabst JA, Syrette JA, Cox DN. A comparison of paper-and-pencil and computerised methods of "hard" laddering. Food Qual Prefer 2004; 15(3): 279-291. 
  31. Diedericks L, Erasmus AC, Donoghue S. Now is the time to embrace interactive electronic applications of Association Pattern Technique. J Retail Consum Serv 2020; 56: 102191. 
  32. Hand C, Dall'Olmo Riley F, Harris P, Singh J, Rettie R. Online grocery shopping: the influence of situational factors. Eur J Mark 2009; 43(9/10): 1205-1219. 
  33. Kang C, Moon J, Kim T, Choe Y. Why consumers go to online grocery: comparing vegetables with grains. Proceedings of 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS); 2016 Jan 5-8; HI, USA. p. 3604-3613. 
  34. Chocarro R, Cortinas M, Villanueva ML. Situational variables in online versus offline channel choice. Electron Commer Res Appl 2013; 12(5): 347-361. 
  35. Liu B. Analysis of factors influencing online grocery shopping by Korean and Chinese consumers: application of behavioral reasoning theory and technology continuance theory. [dissertation]. Kookmin University; 2023. 
  36. Vanden Abeele V, Hauters E, Zaman B. Increasing the reliability and validity of quantitative laddering data with LadderUX. Proceedings of CHI '12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '12); 2012 May 5-10; NY, USA: p. 2057-2062. 
  37. Kilwinger FBM, van Dam YK. Methodological considerations on the means-end chain analysis revisited. Psychol Mark 2021; 38(9): 1513-1524. 
  38. Alba J, Lynch J, Weitz B, Janiszewski C, Lutz R, Sawyer A, et al. Interactive home shopping: consumer, retailer, and manufacturer incentives to participate in electronic marketplaces. J Mark 1997; 61(3): 38-53. 
  39. To PL, Liao C, Lin TH. Shopping motivations on internet: a study based on utilitarian and hedonic value. Technovation 2007; 27(12): 774-787. 
  40. Kim J. Analysis for growth potential in response to changes in the online food market. Sustainability 2020; 12(11): 4386. 
  41. Singh R, Rosengren S. Why do online grocery shoppers switch? An empirical investigation of drivers of switching in online grocery. J Retail Consum Serv 2020; 53: 101962. 
  42. Driediger F, Bhatiasevi V. Online grocery shopping in Thailand: consumer acceptance and usage behavior. J Retail Consum Serv 2019; 48: 224-237.