Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science (한국문헌정보학회지)

Korean Society For Library And Information Science (한국문헌정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation and Case Study of Geoscience Data Repositories Using re3data.org

re3data.org를 활용한 Geoscience 분야 데이터 리포지터리 평가 및 사례 연구

  • 김주섭 (전북대학교 문헌정보학과, 연구데이터융복합연구소) ;
  • 김선태 (전북대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2024.07.26
  • Accepted : 2024.08.16
  • Published : 2024.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In order to share and reuse research data, data repositories are operated mainly by research institutes, communities, and countries. Currently, there are 3,236 data repositories registered on re3data.org, and the repositories are operated by each subject. The purpose of this study is to identify the operational status of data repositories in the Geoscience field and provide repository services in the field. As a result of the study, 634 out of 890 data repositories in the Geoscience field satisfied more than 4 out of 9 properties, confirming that approximately 74% of the repositories are generally well operated. In addition, as a result of checking the services in the repositories, it was found that they provide various implications in terms of data policy, curation, tools and APIs, and quality management. These research results will serve as a basis for reference when configuring data repository services in the Geoscience field in the future.

연구데이터 공유 및 재사용을 위하여 데이터 리포지터리가 연구기관, 커뮤니티 그리고 국가를 중심으로 운영되고 있다. 현재, re3data.org에는 데이터 리포지터리가 3,236개가 등록되어 있으며 해당 리포지터리는 각 주제별로 운영되고 있다. 본 연구의 목적은 Geoscience 분야 데이터 리포지터리의 운영 현황을 파악하여 해당 분야의 리포지터리 서비스를 제공하기 위함이다. 연구 결과, Geoscience 분야 데이터 리포지터리 890개 중 634개가 9개 속성 중 4개 이상을 만족하고 있는 것을 나타나 약 74%의 리포지터리가 보편적으로 잘 운영되고 있다는 것을 확인하였다. 또한 해당 리포지터리에서 서비스를 확인한 결과 데이터 정책, 큐레이션, 도구 및 API 그리고 품질관리 측면에서 다양한 시사점을 제공하는 것으로 파악되었다. 이러한 연구 결과는 앞으로 Geoscience 분야 데이터 리포지터리 서비스 구성 시 참고할 수 있는 기초가 될 것이다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 논문은 2024년도 전북대학교 연구기반 조성비 지원에 의하여 연구되었음.

References

  1. Cho, Jane & Park, Jong Do (2019). A study on analysis of research data repository in Humanities and Social Sciences. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 30(2), 69-87. https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2019.30.2.069 
  2. Geo Big Data Open Platform. Available: https://data.kigam.re.kr/?lang=en 
  3. Kim, Juseop (2023). A study on the status of data repositories in the field of Geoscience and ways to obtain CoreTrustSeal certification: focusing on re3data.org and CoreTrustSeal best practices. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 54(2), 89-110. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.54.2.202306.89 
  4. Kim, Woojoong, Kim, Hyungjoon, Park, Heejin, & Choi, Sangok (2021). An analysis on operational level, subjects, content types and utilization of Research Data Repositories in Natural Science. Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 24(4), 577-595.  https://doi.org/10.35978/jktis.2021.8.24.4.577
  5. Rhee, Hea Lim (2023). A study on the preservation policy framework of data repository: focusing on CoreTrustSeal certification. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 57(4), 119-138. http://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2023.57.4.119 
  6. Australian Ocean Data Network Portal. Available: https://portal.aodn.org.au/ 
  7. Clarivate. Available: https://clarivate.com/webofsciencegroup/master-data-repository-list/ 
  8. Donaldson, D. R. (2020). Certification information on trustworthy digital repository websites: a content analysis. PLoS One, 15(12), https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242525 
  9. Downs, R. R. (2021). Improving opportunities for new value of open data: assessing and certifying research data repositories. Data Science Journal, 20(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2021-001 
  10. Environmental Information Data Centre. Available: https://eidc.ac.uk/ 
  11. Environmental Information Data Centre. Available: https://portal.edirepository.org/nis/home.jsp 
  12. Frank, R. D. (2022). Risk in trustworthy digital repository audit and certification. Archival Science, 22(1), 43-73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-021-09366-z 
  13. ICTS SOCIB Data Repository. Available: https://www.socib.es/data/ 
  14. IFREMER-SISMER Portail de donnees marines. Available: https://data.ifremer.fr/
  15. Khan, A. M., Loan, F. A., Parray, U. Y., & Rashid, S. (2024). Global overview of research data repositories: an analysis of re3data registry. Information Discovery and Delivery, 52(1), 53-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IDD-07-2022-0069 
  16. Khan, N., Thelwall, M., & Kousha, K. (2022). Are data repositories fettered? A survey of current practices, challenges and future technologies. Online Information Review, 46(3), 483-502. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-04-2021-0204 
  17. Lin, D., McAuliffe, M., Pruitt, K. D., Gururaj, A., Melchior, C., Schmitt, C., & Wright, S. N. (2024). Biomedical data repository concepts and management principles. Scientific Data, 11(1), 622. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-03449-z 
  18. Mosha, N. F. & Ngulube, P. (2023a). The utilisation of open research data repositories for storing and sharing research data in higher learning institutions in Tanzania. Library Management, 44(8/9), 566-580. https://doi.org/10.1108/LM-05-2023-0042 
  19. Mosha, N. F. & Ngulube, P. (2023b). Metadata standard for continuous preservation, discovery, and reuse of research data in repositories by higher education institutions: a systematic review. Information, 14, 427. https://doi.org/10.3390/info14080427 
  20. National Geoscience Data Centre. Available: https://www.bgs.ac.uk/geological-data/national-geoscience-data-centre/ 
  21. Neotoma Paleoecology Database. Available: https://www.neotomadb.org/ 
  22. NSF Arctic Data Center. Available: https://arcticdata.io/ 
  23. PANGAEA. Available: https://www.pangaea.de/ 
  24. re3data.org. Available: https://www.re3data.org/ 
  25. Research Data Archive at NCAR. Available: https://rda.ucar.edu/ 
  26. Schopfel, J. (2022). Issues and Prospects for Research Data Repositories. Wiley Online Library. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394163410.ch12 
  27. Stvilia, B. & Lee, DJ. (2024). Data quality assurance in research data repositories: a theory-guided exploration and model. Journal of Documentation, 80(4), 793-812.  https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-09-2023-0177
  28. Tethys. Available: https://www.tethys.at/ 
  29. The CEDA Archive. Available: https://archive.ceda.ac.uk/