International Journal of Advanced Culture Technology

The International Promotion Agency of Culture Technology (국제문화기술진흥원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Reconsidering the Semantic Properties of the Get-Passive Construction

  • Eunsuk Lee (Dept. of English Education, Daegu Univ.)
  • Received : 2024.05.27
  • Accepted : 2024.09.05
  • Published : 2024.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

We aim to re-examine the semantic properties of the get-passive construction in English, distinguishing it from the more commonly discussed be-passive. Through a detailed analysis of a variety of examples and linguistic contexts, we explore how the get-passive uniquely conveys dynamic, agentive meanings that often implicate the subject in the event's outcome. This construction is particularly prevalent in informal and colloquial speech, where it is frequently employed to depict both adversity and beneficial situations. Our study also reveals that the get-passive has been gaining traction in contemporary English, reflecting broader linguistic trends that favor more expressive and nuanced forms of communication. We argue that understanding these semantic nuances is essential for English learners, as it allows them to navigate the subtle differences between passive constructions more effectively. By mastering the use of the get-passive, learners can enhance their communicative competence, particularly in contexts where speaker stance and subject involvement are key.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by Daegu University Research Grant, 2024.

References

  1. O. Jesperson, A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles, Allen and Urwin, 1949.
  2. G. Curme, Syntax, Heath, 1931.
  3. A. Hatcher, "To Get/Be Invited," Modern Language Notes, Vol. 64, No. 7, pp. 433-446, 1949. https://doi.org/10.2307/2910009
  4. R. Lakoff, "Passive Resistance," in Proc. 7th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 149-162, 1971.
  5. C. Barber, Linguistic Change in Present-day English, Oliver, 1964.
  6. C. Mair, Twenty-century English: History, Variation and Standardization, Cambridge University Press, 2006.
  7. H. Lindquist, Corpus Linguistics and the Description of English, Edinburgh University Press, 2009.
  8. P. Collins, "Get-Passives in English," World English, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 43-56, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.1996.tb00091.x
  9. R. Huddleston and G. Pullum, The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, Cambridge University Press, 2002.
  10. R. Carter and M. McCarthy, "The English Get-Passive in Spoken Discourse: Description and Implications for an Interpersonal Grammar," English Language and Linguistics, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 41-58, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1017/S136067439900012X
  11. R. Cowan, Teacher's Grammar of English, Cambridge University Press, 2008.
  12. R. Sussex, "A Note on the Get-Passive Construction," Australian Journal of Linguistics, Vol. 2, pp. 183-195, 1982. https://doi.org/10.1080/07268608208599283
  13. A. Siewierska, The Passive: A Comparative Linguistic Analysis, Croom Helm, 1984.
  14. M. Vanrespaille, "A Semantic Analysis of the English Get-Passive," Interface, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 95-112, 1991.
  15. R. Quirk and S. Greenbaum, A Student's Grammar of the English Language, Longman, 1990.
  16. J. Svartvik, On Voice in the English Verb, Mouton, 1966.