한국환경보건학회지 (Journal of Environmental Health Sciences)

  • 제50권4호
  • /
  • Pages.282-290
  • /
  • 2024
  • /
  • 1738-4087(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2233-8616(eISSN)
한국환경보건학회 (Korean Society of Environmental Health)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

대기관리권역법 시행효과 평가를 위한 전북지역 초미세먼지 현황 및 건강영향 사전연구

A Preliminary Study on the Current Status and Health Effects of PM2.5 for Evaluating the Act on Air Quality Management Regions in Jeollabuk-do Province

  • 마창진 (일본 후쿠오카여자대학교 환경과학과) ;
  • 장남정 (전북연구원 지속사회정책실 기후.환경팀) ;
  • 강공언 (원광보건대학교 보건의료행정과)
  • Chang-Jin Ma (Department of Environmental Science, Fukuoka Women's University) ;
  • Nam-Jeong Jang (Climate Environment Team, Sustainable Social Policy Office, Jeonbuk Research Institute) ;
  • Gong-Unn Kang (Department of Health & Medical Administration, Wonkwang Health Science University)
  • 투고 : 2024.06.05
  • 심사 : 2024.07.02
  • 발행 : 2024.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Background: In order to evaluate the national effort to improve air quality through the Act on Air Quality Management Regions, an investigation of the current status of air quality in respective regions and the health impact of air pollution should be undertaken. Objectives: This study is a preliminary study on the status of PM2.5 in the central region of South Korea and its health effects. It can be applied to the evaluation of the effectiveness of the Act on Air Quality Management Regions. Methods: Time series variation of PM2.5 concentrations in the air quality management region (hereafter referred to as AQMR) and in the non-AQMR area in the central region of South Korea were created. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated based on the survey results of whether the residents of Jeollabuk-do were feeling anxiety caused by air pollution by sex, region, and regional characteristics. Relative risk (RR) values of lung cancer deaths in each city in the AQMR for the central region of South Korea were calculated. Results: During the period from Dec. 2018 to Dec. 2021, the average concentration of PM2.5 was higher in the AQMR at 26.0 ㎍/m3 compared to 19.5 ㎍/m3 in the non-AQMR. The odds ratio (OR) calculated using data from the Jeonbuk Research Institute (2020) suggested that women were more uncomfortable or anxious about their lives due to air pollutants than were men. The OR evaluation results also showed that in terms of PM2.5 sensitivity, residents in the non-AQMR were relatively more sensitive than those in the AQMR. The relative risk (RR) was calculated to evaluate the relationship between health hazards (PM2.5) and diseases (lung cancer). As a result, for super-aged people over 80 years old, compared to the non-AQMR (Muju-gun and Jangsu-gun), the residents in the AQMR (Jeonju, Gunsan, and Iksan) have about twice the relative risk of lung cancer. Conclusions: It is necessary to make efforts to improve residents' health and extend their healthy lives through efforts to reduce air pollutants such as PM2.5 in areas specially selected as an AQMR.

키워드

과제정보

본 연구는 전라북도가 발주하고 전북연구원이 수행한 '미세먼지 관리 종합계획 및 중부권 대기환경 개선 기본계획에 따른 전라북도 시행계획 수립' 연구 지원으로 수행되었으며, 이에 감사드립니다.

참고문헌

  1. Barnes NM, Ng TW, Ma KK, Lai KM. In-cabin air quality during driving and engine idling in air-conditioned private vehicles in Hong Kong. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018; 15(4): 611. 
  2. Brauer M. How much, how long, what, and where: air pollution exposure assessment for epidemiologic studies of respiratory disease. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2010; 7(2): 111-115. 
  3. Park JM, Shin HJ, Jung HJ, Park JH, Jung DH, Jung ES, et al. Annual report of air quality in Korea 2022. Incheon: National Institute of Environmental Research (NIER); 2023. Report No.: NIERGP2023-046. p. 371-392. 
  4. Korea Industrial Complex Corporation. National industrial complex statistics. Available: https://www.kicox.or.kr/user/bbs/BD_selectBbs.do?q_bbsCode=1036&q_bbscttSn=20230614173501482&q_order=&q_clCode=2 [accessed 22 June 2023]. 
  5. Statistics Korea. Automobile registration status report. Available: https://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=116&tblId=DT_MLTM_5498 [accessed 22 June 2023]. 
  6. Jeonbuk Ilbo. PM2.5, the worst in Jeonbuk. Available: https://www.jjan.kr/article/20160218574131 [accessed 22 June 2023]. 
  7. Lee SB, Son JS, Park JH, Kang SY, Lee SH, Park YS, et al. Annual report of air quality in Korea 2017. Incheon: National Institute of Environmental Research (NIER); 2018. Report No.: NIERGP2018-040. p.164. 
  8. National Fine Dust Information Center of Korean Environment Ministry. Available: https://www.air.go.kr/main.do# [accessed 22 June 2023]. 
  9. Jang NJ, Im SH, Kim SY, Choi YG, Kang GU, Ma CG, et al. Implementation plan for Jeollabuk-do in accordance with the comprehensive plan for fine dust management and the basic plan for improving air quality in the central region. Jeonju: Jeollabuk-do; 2021. p. 346-366. 
  10. Brauer M, Lencar C, Tamburic L, Koehoorn M, Demers P, Karr C. A cohort study of traffic-related air pollution impacts on birth outcomes. Environ Health Perspect. 2008; 116(5): 680-686. 
  11. Korea Meteorological Administration. Asian dust storm observation days. Available: https://www.kma.go.kr/plus/dust/observday.jsp?type=1&stnId=146&x=31&y=4 [accessed 22 June 2023]. 
  12. Jeonbuk Regional Environment Agency. Environmental statistics. Available: http://www.me.go.kr/smg/web/index.do?menuId=834 [accessed 22 June 2023]. 
  13. Shu Y, Zhu L, Yuan F, Kong X, Huang T, Cai YD. Analysis of the relationship between PM2.5 and lung cancer based on protein-protein interactions. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen. 2016; 19(2): 100-108. 
  14. Statistics Korea. Cause of death statistics. Available: https://kosis. kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=101&tblId=DT_1B34E12&conn_path=I3 [accessed 22 June 2023]. 
  15. Cohen AJ, Brauer M, Burnett R, Anderson HR, Frostad J, Estep K, et al. Estimates and 25-year trends of the global burden of disease attributable to ambient air pollution: an analysis of data from the Global Burden of Diseases Study 2015. Lancet. 2017; 389(10082): 1907-1918. 
  16. Franklin M, Zeka A, Schwartz J. Association between PM2.5 and all-cause and specific-cause mortality in 27 US communities. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2007; 17(3): 279-287.