연구윤리 (Journal of Research and Publication Ethics)

한국유통과학회 (Korea Distribution Science Association)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Research Ethics within an Internet-based Research Setting: Current Literature Investigation

  • Eungoo KANG (Becamex School of Business, Eastern International University) ;
  • Hee-Joong HWANG (Department of International Trade, Korea National Open University)
  • 투고 : 2024.02.16
  • 심사 : 2024.09.15
  • 발행 : 2024.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose: The internet, as a tool, avenue, and field, has wide-researching and specific ethical concerns. Internet-based research ethics is a field that spreads across numerous fields, scoping from natural and biomedical sciences to social sciences, and arts and humanities. Thus, this study which investigates research ethics within an Internet-based Research Setting will be quite valuable. Research design, data and methodology: The current authors widely took a look at prior and present literature dataset to explore research ethics within an Internet-based setting. Using numerous search engine, such as 'Goole Scholar', 'Scopus', and 'Web of Science', the current authors could obtain total 42 prior studies that are relevant with our research topic. Results: Based on the screening process in the literature datasets, this study could categorize four areas of the research ethics within Internet-based research setting as follows: (1) Human Subjects Ethics, (2) Big Data Ethical Issues, (3) Research Ethics and Cloud, and (4) Computing Interviews and Surveys Ethics. Conclusions: This study concludes that although internet-based research has many benefits, the accompanying ethical issues are many. The lack of uniformity in the concept and terminology of online research methods typically brings forth confusion and makes it hard for new researchers to develop mutual guidelines.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Abbas, A., Fatima, A., Arrona-Palacios, A., Haruna, H., & Hosseini, S. (2021). Research ethics dilemma in higher education: Impact of internet access, ethical controls, and teaching factors on student plagiarism. Education and Information Technologies, 26(5), 6109-6121.
  2. Anabo, I. F., Elexpuru-Albizuri, I., & Villardon-Gallego, L. (2019). Revisiting the Belmont Report's ethical principles in internet-mediated research: Perspectives from disciplinary associations in the social sciences. Ethics and Information Technology, 21(2), 137-149.
  3. Bailey, E., Muhlmann, C., Rice, S., Nedeljkovic, M., Alvarez-Jimenez, M., Sander, L., ... & Robinson, J. (2020). Ethical issues and practical barriers in internet-based suicide prevention research: a review and investigator survey. BMC medical ethics, 21, 1-16.
  4. Borgueta, A. M., Purvis, C. K., & Newman, M. G. (2018). Navigating the ethics of internet-guided self-help interventions. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 25(2), e12235.
  5. Burles, M. C., & Bally, J. M. (2018). Ethical, practical, and methodological considerations for unobtrusive qualitative research about personal narratives shared on the internet. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 17(1), 1609406918788203.
  6. Cagle, L. E. (2021). The ethics of researching unethical images: A story of trying to do good research without doing bad things. Computers and Composition, 61, 102651.
  7. Chua, S. M. (2022). Navigating conflict between research ethics and online platform terms and conditions: a reflective account. Research Ethics, 18(1), 39-50.
  8. Cilliers, L., & Viljoen, K. (2021). A framework of ethical issues to consider when conducting internet-based research. South African Journal of Information Management, 23(1), 1-9.
  9. Clark, K., Duckham, M., Guillemin, M., Hunter, A., McVernon, J., O'Keefe, C., ... & Waycott, J. (2019). Advancing the ethical use of digital data in human research: challenges and strategies to promote ethical practice. Ethics and Information Technology, 21, 59-73.
  10. Conway, M. (2021). Online extremism and terrorism research ethics: Researcher safety, informed consent, and the need for tailored guidelines. Terrorism and political violence, 33(2), 367-380.
  11. Crawford, S., Hokke, S., Nicholson, J. M., Zion, L., Lucke, J., Keyzer, P., & Hackworth, N. (2019). "It's not black and white" Public health researchers' and ethics committees' perceptions of engaging research participants online. Internet Research, 29(1), 123-143.
  12. Ess, C. M. (2020). at the intersections of information, computing and internet research. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 18(1), 1-9.
  13. Fiesler, C., Bruckman, A., Kraut, R. E., Muller, M., Munteanu, C., & Shilton, K. (2018). Research ethics and regulation: An open forum. In Companion of the 2018 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (pp. 125-128).
  14. Foley, J. P. (2020). Ethics in internet. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 32(1/2), 179-192.
  15. Genevieve, L. D., Wangmo, T., Dietrich, D., Woolley-Meza, O., Flahault, A., & Elger, B. S. (2018). Research ethics in the European Influenzanet Consortium: scoping review. JMIR public health and surveillance, 4(4), e9616.
  16. Griffin, M., Martino, R. J., LoSchiavo, C., Comer-Carruthers, C., Krause, K. D., Stults, C. B., & Halkitis, P. N. (2021). Ensuring survey research data integrity in the era of internet bots. Quality & quantity, 56, 2841-2852.
  17. Hanganu, B., Manoilescu, I. S., & Ioan, B. G. (2021). Ethical challenges in online research. Journal of Intercultural Management and Ethics, 4(3), 17-24.
  18. Hesse, A., Glenna, L., Hinrichs, C., Chiles, R., & Sachs, C. (2019). Qualitative research ethics in the big data era. American Behavioral Scientist, 63(5), 560-583.
  19. Hokke, S., Hackworth, N. J., Quin, N., Bennetts, S. K., Win, H. Y., Nicholson, J. M., ... & Crawford, S. B. (2018). Ethical issues in using the internet to engage participants in family and child research: A scoping review. PloS one, 13(9), e0204572.
  20. Kang, E. (2023). Literature Evaluation: The Focus on the Difference between Job-based Pay and Skill-based Pay Scheme. The Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 14(7), 1-7.
  21. Kang, E., & Hwang, H. J. (2023). The importance of anonymity and confidentiality for conducting survey research. Journal of Research adn Publication Ethics, 4(1), 1-7.
  22. Kelley, B., & Weaver, S. (2020). Researching people who (probably) hate you: when practicing "good" ethics means protecting yourself. Computers and Composition, 56, 102567.
  23. Kinder-Kurlanda, K., & Zimmer, M. (2019, June). Web Research Ethics: Confidentiality, Consent, Data Integrity & More. In Companion Publication of the 10th ACM Conference on Web Science (pp. 21-22).
  24. Lapadat, J. C. (2019). Stories on the internet: Challenges for qualitative research and the example of ethics. In Computer Supported Qualitative Research: New Trends on Qualitative Research 3 (pp. 266-278). Springer International Publishing.
  25. Locatelli, E. (2018). Ethics of Social Media Research: State of the Debate and Future Challenges. Second International Handbook of Internet Research.
  26. Looijmans, A., Spahrkas, S. S., Sanderman, R., & Hagedoorn, M. (2022). Ethical review procedures in international internet-based intervention studies. Internet interventions, 28, 100487.
  27. Markham, A. N., Tiidenberg, K., & Herman, A. (2018). Ethics as methods: doing ethics in the era of big data research-introduction. Social Media+ Society, 4(3), 2056305118784502.
  28. Murukannaiah, P. K., & Singh, M. P. (2020). From machine ethics to internet ethics: Broadening the horizon. IEEE Internet Computing, 24(03), 51-57.
  29. McInroy, L. B., & Beer, O. W. (2022). Adapting vignettes for internet-based research: Eliciting realistic responses to the digital milieu. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 25(3), 335-347.
  30. Pauley, E., & McDaniel, P. (2023, February). Understanding the Ethical Frameworks of Internet Measurement Studies. In 2nd International Workshop on Ethics in Computer Security.
  31. Rambukkana, N. (2019). The politics of gray data: digital methods, intimate proximity, and research ethics for work on the "alt-right". Qualitative Inquiry, 25(3), 312-323.
  32. Salwen, H. (2021). Research ethical norms, guidance and the internet. Science and Engineering Ethics, 27(6), 67.
  33. Shahraki, A., & Haugen, O. (2018). Social ethics in Internet of Things: An outline and review. 2018 IEEE Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems (ICPS), 509-516.
  34. Schneider, S., May, M., & Stone, A. A. (2018). Careless responding in internet-based quality of life assessments. Quality of Life Research, 27, 1077-1088.
  35. Singh, S., & Sagar, R. (2021). A critical look at online survey or questionnaire-based research studies during COVID-19. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 65, 102850.
  36. Smith, K. V., Thew, G. R., & Graham, B. (2018). Conducting ethical internet-based research with vulnerable populations: A qualitative study of bereaved participants' experiences of online questionnaires. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 9(sup1), 1506231.
  37. Thompson, R. M., Hall, J., Morrison, C., Palmer, N. R., & Roberts, D. L. (2021). Ethics and governance for internet-based conservation science research. Conservation Biology, 35(6), 1747-1754.
  38. Williams, R. (2023). Think piece: ethics for the virtual researcher. Practice, 5(1), 41-47.
  39. Vogt, A., Hauber, R., Kuhlen, A. K., & Rahman, R. A. (2021). Internet-based language production research with overt articulation: Proof of concept, challenges, and practical advice. Behavior Research Methods, 54:1954-1975.
  40. Zimmer, M. (2020). "But the data is already public": on the ethics of research in Facebook. In The ethics of information technologies (pp. 229-241). Routledge.
  41. Zschirnt, E. (2019). Research ethics in correspondence testing: An update. Research Ethics, 15(2), 1-21.