Structural Monitoring and Maintenance

  • 제11권2호
  • /
  • Pages.101-126
  • /
  • 2024
  • /
  • 2288-6605(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-6613(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A novel approach for the definition and detection of structural irregularity in reinforced concrete buildings

  • S.P. Akshara (Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology Calicut) ;
  • M. Abdul Akbar (Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology Calicut) ;
  • T.M. Madhavan Pillai (Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology Calicut) ;
  • Renil Sabhadiya (KEC International, RPG centre, 30, Forjet street, near Bhatia hospital) ;
  • Rakesh Pasunuti (L&T Construction)
  • 투고 : 2024.05.04
  • 심사 : 2024.06.18
  • 발행 : 2024.06.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

To avoid irregularities in buildings, design codes worldwide have introduced detailed guidelines for their check and rectification. However, the criteria used to define and identify each of the plan and vertical irregularities are specific and may vary between codes of different countries, thus making their implementation difficult. This short communication paper proposes a novel approach for quantifying different types of structural irregularities using a common parameter named as unified identification factor, which is exclusively defined for the columns based on their axial loads and tributary areas. The calculation of the identification factor is demonstrated through the analysis of rectangular and circular reinforced concrete models using ETABS v18.0.2, which are further modified to generate plan irregular (torsional irregularity, cut-out in floor slab and non-parallel lateral force system) and vertical irregular (mass irregularity, vertical geometric irregularity and floating columns) models. The identification factor is calculated for all the columns of a building and the range within which the value lies is identified. The results indicate that the range will be very wide for an irregular building when compared to that with a regular configuration, thus implying a strong correlation of the identification factor with the structural irregularity. Further, the identification factor is compared for different columns within a floor and between floors for each building model. The findings suggest that the value will be abnormally high or low for a column in the vicinity of an irregularity. The proposed factor could thus be used in the preliminary structural design phase, so as to eliminate the complications that might arise due to the geometry of the structure when subjected to lateral loads. The unified approach could also be incorporated in future revisions of codes, as a replacement for the numerous criteria currently used for classifying different types of irregularities.

키워드

과제정보

The stipend provided to the first author by the Ministry of Education, Government of India for pursuing full-time Ph.D. is gratefully acknowledged.

참고문헌

  1. Abdel Raheem, S.E., Ahmed, M.M.M., Ahmed, M.M. and Abdel-shafi A.G.A. (2018), "Evaluation of plan configuration irregularity effects on seismic response demands of L-shaped MRF buildings", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 16(9), 3845-3869. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0319-7.
  2. Agarwal, P. and Shrikhande, M. (2011), Earthquake resistant design of structures, PHI Learning Private Limited, New Delhi, India.
  3. Ahmed, M.M.M., Abdo, M.A.B. and Mohamed, W.A.E. (2021), "Vertical geometric irregularity effect on performance-based seismic design for moderate rise RC moment resisting frame buildings", Arab. J. Sci. Eng., 47(10), 12333-12348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-021-06376-y.
  4. Akan, A., Bingol, K., Ormecioglu, H.T., Er., A. and Ormecioglu, T.O. (2023), "Towards an earthquake-resistant architectural design with the image classification method", J. Asian Archit. Build. Eng., 23(1), 157-170. https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2023.2213299.
  5. Akshara, S.P., Akbar, M.A., Madhavan Pillai, T.M., Pasunuti, R. and Sabhadiya, R. (2024), "Using an appropriate rotation-based criterion to account for torsional irregularity in reinforced concrete buildings", Earthq. Struct., 26(5), 349-361. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2024.26.5.349.
  6. Alaa, K.M., El-Kashif, K.F. and Salem, H.M. (2022), "New definition for torsional irregularity based on floors rotations of reinforced concrete buildings", J. Eng. Appl. Sci., 69(12), 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s44147-021-00061-5.
  7. Alecci, V., De Stefano, M., Galassi, S., Lapi, M. and Orlando, M. (2019), "Evaluation of the American approach for detecting plan irregularity", Adv. Civ. Eng., 2019, 1. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2861093. 
  8. "An engineers guide to: openings in concrete floor slabs", Portland Cement Association, Skokie, Illinois, 2005.
  9. Anagnostopoulos, S.A., Alexopoulou, C. and Stathopoulos, K.G. (2010), "An answer to an important controversy and the need for caution when using simple models to predict inelastic earthquake response of buildings with torsion", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D, 39(5), 521-540. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.957.
  10. Archana, A.R. and Akbar, M.A. (2021), "Structural irregularity quantification in buildings using vital signs", Structures, 34, 2592-2599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.09.026.
  11. ASCE/ SEI 7 (2016), Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures, American Society of Civil Engineers, Virginia, United States of America.
  12. Athanatopoulou, A.M. and Manouka, G.E. (2021), "Torsional sensitivity criteria in seismic codes", Earthquakes Struct., 21(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2021.21.1.001.
  13. Bikce, M. and Celik, T.B. (2016), "Failure analysis of newly constructed RC buildings designed according to 2007 Turkish seismic code during the October 23, 2011 Van earthquake", Eng. Fail. Anal., 64, 67-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2016.03.008.
  14. BNBC (2017), Bangladesh National Building Code-part 6: structural design, Housing and Building Research Institute, Bangladesh.
  15. Bosco, M., Ferrara, G.A.F., Ghersi, A., Marino, E.M. and Rossi, P.P. (2015), "Seismic assessment of existing R.C. framed structures with in-plan irregularity by nonlinear static methods", Earthq. Struct., 8(2), 401-422. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.8.2.401.
  16. Chunyu, T., Junjin, L., Hong, Z. and Jinzhe, C. (2012), "Experimental study on seismic behavior of an irregular high-rise building", Proceedings of the 15th World Conf. Earthq. Eng. Lisboa, Portugal.
  17. Computers & Structures, Inc. Structural and Earthquake Engineering Software. https://www.csiamerica.com/products/etabs. 2016.
  18. EN 1998-1 (2004), Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance-Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels.
  19. Esteva, L. (1987), "Earthquake engineering research and practice in Mexico after the 1985 earthquakes", Bull. New Zeal. Natl. Soc. Earthq. Eng., 20(3), 159-200. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.20.3.159-200.
  20. FEMA 454 (2006), Risk management Series - Designing for earthquakes, A manual for architects.
  21. FEMA P-2082-1 (2020), NEHRP Recommended Seismic Provisions for New Buildings and Other Structures-volume 1, Building Seismic Safety Council of the National Institute of Building Sciences, Washington, United States of America.
  22. Firoj, M. and Singh, S.K. (2018), "Response spectrum analysis for irregular multi-storey structure in seismic zone V", Proceedings of the 16th Symp. Earthq. Eng. IIT Roorkee, India.
  23. Garini, E. and Gazetas, G. (2023), "The 2 earthquakes of February 6th 2023 in Turkey: preliminary report", NTUA, Greece.
  24. GB 50011 (2010), Code for Seismic Design of Buildings, Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People's Republic of China.
  25. Ghanem, A., Lee, Y.J. and Moon, D.S. (2024), "Seismic vulnerability of reinforced concrete frame structures: obtaining plan or vertical mass irregularity from structure use change", J. Struct. Eng., 150(3), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1061/jsendh.steng-12440.
  26. Goel, R.K. and Chopra, A.K. (1991), "Effects of plan asymmetry in inelastic seismic response of one-story systems", J. Struct. Eng., 117(5), 1492-1513. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1991)117:5(1492).
  27. Gwalani, P., Singh, Y. and Varum, H. (2022), "Effect of bidirectional excitation on seismic performance of regular RC frame buildings designed for modern codes", Earthq. Spectra, 38(2), 950-980. https://doi.org/10.1177/87552930211047879.
  28. Habibi, A., Gholami, R. and Izadpanah, M. (2019), "Behavior factor of vertically irregular RCMRFs based on incremental dynamic analysis", Earthq. Struct., 16(6), 655-664. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2019.16.6.655.
  29. Haque, M., Ray, S., Chakraborty, A., Elias, M. and Alam, I. (2016), "Seismic performance analysis of RCC multi-storied buildings with plan irregularity", Am. J. Civ. Eng., 4(3), 68-73. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajce.20160403.11.
  30. IS 875 (1987), Indian Standard Code of Practice for Design Loads (other than Earthquake) for Buildings and Structures-part 2: Imposed loads, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India.
  31. IS 456 (2000), Indian Standard for Plain and Reinforced Concrete-Code of Practice, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India.
  32. IS 1786 (2008), Indian Standard for High Strength Deformed Steel Bars and Wires for Concrete Reinforcement-Specification, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India.
  33. IS 1893 (2016), Indian Standard Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures-part 1: general provisions and buildings, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India.
  34. KBC (2009), Korean Building Code, Structural Korean Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transportation, Korea.
  35. Marusic, D. and Fajfar, P. (2005), "On the inelastic seismic response of asymmetric buildings under bi-axial excitation", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 34(8), 943-963. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.463.
  36. Mitchell, D., DeVall, R.H., Saatcioglu, M., Simpson, R., Tinawi, R. and Tremblay, R. (1995), "Damage to concrete structures due to the 1994 Northridge earthquake", Can. J. Civ. Eng., 22(2), 361-377. https://doi.org/10.1139/l95-047
  37. Mouhine, M. and Hilali, E. (2022a), "Seismic vulnerability assessment of RC buildings with setback irregularity", Ain Shams Eng. J., 13(1), 101486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2021.05.001.
  38. Mouhine, M. and Hilali, E. (2022b), "Seismic vulnerability for irregular reinforced concrete buildings with consideration of site effects", Mater. Today Proc., 58, 1039-1043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.01.038.
  39. Murty, C.V.R. (2005), Earthquake tips - Learning earthquake design and construction, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur and Building Material and Technology Promotion Council, New Delhi, India.
  40. Nady, O., Mahfouz, S.Y. and Taher, S.E.D.F. (2022), "Quantification of vertical irregularities for earthquake resistant reinforced concrete buildings", Buildings, 12(8), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12081160.
  41. Naveen, E.S., Abraham, N.M. and Kumari, S.D.A. (2019), "Analysis of irregular structures under earthquake loads", Procedia Struct. Integr., 14, 806-819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2019.07.059.
  42. NBC (2020), National Building Code of Canada-volume 1, National Research Council of Canada.
  43. NBC 105 (2020), Nepal National Building Code-seismic design of buildings in Nepal, Ministry of Urban Development, Kathmandu, Nepal.
  44. NSCP C101 (2010), National Structural Code of the Philippines-volume 1: buildings, towers and other vertical structures, Association of the Structural Engineers, Quezon City, Philippines.
  45. Ozhendekci, N. and Polat, Z. (2008), "Torsional irregularity of buildings", Proceedings of the 14th World Conf. Earthq. Eng. Beijing, China.
  46. Ozmen, G., Girgin, K. and Durgun, Y. (2014), "Torsional irregularity in multi-story structures", Int. J. Adv. Struct. Eng., 6(4), 121-131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40091-014-0070-5.
  47. Ravikumar, C.M., Narayan, K.B.S., Sujith, B.V. and Venkat Reddy, D. (2012), "Effect of irregular configurations on seismic vulnerability of RC buildings", Archit. Res., 2(3), 20-26. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.arch.20120203.01.
  48. Saadati, D. and Moghadam, A.S. (2023), "EZRVS: An AI-based web application to significantly enhance seismic rapid visual screening of buildings", J. Earthq. Eng., 28(3). 689-706. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2023.2217944.
  49. SI 413 (1995), Design Provisions for Earthquake Resistance of Structures, The Standards Institution of Israel.
  50. TSC (2007), Specification for Buildings to be Built in Seismic Zones, Ministry of Public Works and Settlement, Government of Republic of Turkey.
  51. UBC (1997), Uniform Building Code-volume 2: structural engineering design provisions, International Conference of Building Officials, California, United States of America.
  52. Valmundsson, E.V. and Nau, J.M. (1997), "Seismic response of building frames with vertical structural irregularities", J. Struct. Eng., 123(1), 30-41. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1997)123:1(30).
  53. Vielma-Quintero, J.C., Diaz-Segura, E.G. and Vielma, J.C. (2024), "Influence of the plan structural symmetry on the non-linear seismic response of framed reinforced concrete buildings", Symmetry (Basel)., 16(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/sym16030370.
  54. Visicon, Inc. Smart BIM Tools. https://visicon.com/calculate-tributary-loads/ 2019.
  55. Wang, J., Dai, K., Yin, Y. and Tesfamariam, S. (2018), "Seismic performance-based design and risk analysis of thermal power plant building with consideration of vertical and mass irregularities", Eng. Struct., 164, 141-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.03.001.
  56. Wood, S.L., Wight, J.K. and Moehle, J.P. (2002), "The 1985 Chile earthquake observations on earthquake-resistant construction in Vina Del Mar", UILU-ENG-87-2002; National Science Foundation, Alexandria, VA, USA.
  57. Zhang, C., Alam, Z. and Samali, B. (2016), "Evaluating contradictory relationship between floor rotation and torsional irregularity coefficient under varying orientations of ground motion", Earthq. Struct., 11(6), 1027-1041. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.11.6.1027.