DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Microplastic Exposure against White Spot Syndrome Virus Infection in Pacific White Shrimp (Penaeus vannamei)

  • Hye Jin Jeon (Laboratory of Aquatic Biomedicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Sangsu Seo (Laboratory of Aquatic Biomedicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Chorong Lee (Laboratory of Aquatic Biomedicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Bumkeun Kim (Laboratory of Aquatic Biomedicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Patharapol Piamsomboon (Department of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University) ;
  • Ji Hyung Kim (Department of Food Science and Biotechnology, Gachon University) ;
  • Jee Eun Han (Laboratory of Aquatic Biomedicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kyungpook National University)
  • Received : 2024.02.01
  • Accepted : 2024.03.10
  • Published : 2024.08.28

Abstract

Plastic waste has emerged as a major environmental concern in recent years. As plastic waste discharged into the marine environment, it undergoes a breakdown process, eventually accumulating in aquatic organisms in the form of microplastics (MPs). To date, reduced food intake, nutritional absorption, and impaired immune system are known adverse effects of MPs-exposed aquatic organisms. This study aims to investigate whether MP exposure accelerated white spot syndrome virus (WSSV) infection in Pacific white shrimp (Penaeus vannamei) via laboratory tests. Briefly, experimental shrimp were divided into four groups; WSSV (group 1); MP (group 2); WSSV + MP (group 3); and Control (group 4). No mortality was observed in group 2, group 4, and even in group 1. However, group 3 showed a cumulative mortality of 50% during the experimental period. The PCR assay results showed no WSSV in the other three groups (groups 1, 2, and 4), but the dead and alive shrimp collected from group 3 were confirmed to be infected with the virus. Histopathological examination revealed normal structures in the hepatopancreas, gill, and muscle tissues of group 4, whereas numerous abnormally shaped nuclei were detected in the gill tissue of group 2. Moreover, group 1 showed minor WSSV-related lesions with few basophilic inclusion bodies in the gills, interestingly, group 3 exhibited severe lesions with numerous basophilic inclusion bodies in the gills. In conclusion, this study confirmed the correlation between the viral disease of shrimp and MPs, which can cause significant economic losses to the shrimp aquaculture industry.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF2019R1C1C1006212 and NRF2022R1I1A3066435). The work was also supported by the Development of technology for biomaterialization of marine fisheries by-products of the Korea Institute of Marine Science & Technology Promotion (KIMST) funded by the Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries (KIMST-20220128).

References

  1. Gunalan BSNT, Nina TS, Soundarapandian P, Anand T. 2013. Nutritive value of cultured white leg shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei. Int. J. Fish. Aquacult. 5: 166-171. 
  2. Venugopal V. 2019. Nutrients and Nutraceuticals from Seafood. In Merillon JM, Ramawat K (eds.), Bioactive Molecules in Food. Reference Series in Phytochemistry. Springer, Cham. 
  3. FAO. 2020. The state of world fisheries and aquaculture. Sustainability in action. Rome, Italy: FAO. 
  4. FAO. 2022. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2022. Towards Blue Transformation. Rome, FAO. 
  5. Chen SN, Chang PS, Kou GH. 1989. Observation on pathogenicity and epizootiology of Penaeus monodon baculovirus (MBV) in cultured shrimp in Taiwan. Fish Pathol. 24: 189-195.  https://doi.org/10.3147/jsfp.24.189
  6. Lightner DV, Redman RM, Poulos BT, Nunan LM, Mari JL, Hasson KW. 1997. Risk of spread of penaeid shrimp viruses in the. Rev. Sci. Tech. Off. Int. Epiz 16: 146-160.  https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.16.1.1010
  7. Stentiford GD, Neil DM, Peeler EJ, Shields JD, Small HJ, Flegel TW, et al. 2012. Disease will limit future food supply from the global crustacean fishery and aquaculture sectors. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 110: 141-157.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jip.2012.03.013
  8. Otta SK, Shubha G, Joseph B, Chakraborty A, Karunasagar I. 1999. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) detection of white spot syndrome virus (WSSV) in cultured and wild crustaceans in India. Dis. Aquat. Org. 38: 67-70.  https://doi.org/10.3354/dao038067
  9. Durand SV, Lightner DV. 2002. Quantitative real time PCR for the measurement of white spot syndrome virus in shrimp. J. Fish Dis. 25: 381-389.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2761.2002.00367.x
  10. Tsai JM, Wang HC, Leu JH, Wang AHJ, Zhuang Y, Walker PJ, et al. 2006. Identification of the nucleocapsid, tegument, and envelope proteins of the shrimp white spot syndrome virus virion. J. Virol. 80: 3021-3029.  https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.80.6.3021-3029.2006
  11. Bir J, Howlader P, Ray S, Sultana S, Khalil SI, Banu GR. 2017. A critical review on white spot syndrome virus (WSSV): a potential threat to shrimp farming in Bangladesh and some Asian countries. Int. J. Microbiol. Mycol. 6: 39-48. 
  12. Lo CF, Ho CH, Peng SE, Chen CH, Hsu HC, Chiu YL, et al. 1996. White spot syndrome baculovirus (WSBV) detected in cultured and captured shrimp, crabs and other arthropods. Dis. Aquat. Org. 27: 215-225.  https://doi.org/10.3354/dao027215
  13. Lo CF, Kou GH. 1998. Virus-associated white spot syndrome of shrimp in Taiwan: a review. Fish Pathol. 33: 365-371.  https://doi.org/10.3147/jsfp.33.365
  14. Xu S, Ma J, Ji R, Pan K, Miao AJ. 2020. Microplastics in aquatic environments: occurrence, accumulation, and biological effects. Sci. Total Environ. 703: 134699. 
  15. Hartmann NB, Huffer T, Thompson RC, Hassello?v M, Verschoor A, Daugaard AE, et al. 2019. Are we speaking the same language? Recommendations for a definition and categorization framework for plastic debris. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53: 1039-1047.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b05297
  16. Moore CJ. 2008. Synthetic polymers in the marine environment: a rapidly increasing, long-term threat. Environ. Res. 108: 131-139.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2008.07.025
  17. Andrady AL. 2011. Microplastics in the marine environment. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 62: 1596-1605.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.05.030
  18. Nelms SE, Galloway TS, Godley BJ, Jarvis DS, Lindeque PK. 2018. Investigating microplastic trophic transfer in marine top predators. Environ. Pollut. 238: 999-1007.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.02.016
  19. Scherer C, Weber A, Lambert S, Wagner M. 2018. Interactions of microplastics with freshwater biota. Freshwater Microplastics. Springer, Cham, pp. 153-180. 
  20. Wang W, Gao H, Jin S, Li R, Na G. 2019. The ecotoxicological effects of microplastics on aquatic food web, from primary producer to human: a review. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 173: 110-117.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.01.113
  21. Browne MA, Niven SJ, Galloway TS, Rowland SJ, Thompson RC. 2013. Microplastic moves pollutants and additives to worms, reducing functions linked to health and biodiversity. Curr. Biol. 23: 2388-2392.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2013.10.012
  22. Sharma VK, Ma X, Lichtfouse E, Robert D. 2022. Nanoplastics are potentially more dangerous than microplastics. Environ. Chem. Lett. 1-4. 
  23. Karbalaei S, Hanachi P, Walker TR, Cole M. 2018. Occurrence, sources, human health impacts and mitigation of microplastic pollution. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 25: 36046-36063.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3508-7
  24. Kogel T, Bjoroy, Toto B, Bienfait AM, Sanden M. 2020. Micro-and nanoplastic toxicity on aquatic life: determining factors. Sci. Total Environ. 709: 136050.
  25. Tang Y, Liu Y, Chen Y, Zhang W, Zhao J, He S, et al. 2021. A review: research progress on microplastic pollutants in aquatic environments. Sci. Total Environ. 766: 142572. 
  26. Dhawan A, Pandey A, Sharma V. 2011. Toxicity assessment of engineered nanomaterials: resolving the challenges. J. Biomed Nanotechnol. 7: 6-7.  https://doi.org/10.1166/jbn.2011.1173
  27. Han JE, Choi SK, Jeon HJ, Park JK, Han SH, Jeong J, et al. 2021. Transcriptional response in the whiteleg shrimp (Penaeus vannamei) to short-term microplastic exposure. Aquac. Rep. 20: 100713. 
  28. Mao X, Xu Y, Cheng Z, Yang Y, Guan Z, Jiang L, Tang K. 2022. The impact of microplastic pollution on ecological environment: a review. Front. Biosci. 27: 46. 
  29. Greven AC, Merk T, Karagoz F, Mohr K, Klapper M, Jovanovic B, et al. 2016. Polycarbonate and polystyrene nanoplastic particles act as stressors to the innate immune system of fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas). Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 35: 3093-3100.  https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.3501
  30. Lei L, Wu S, Lu S, Liu M, Song Y, Fu Z, et al. 2018. Microplastic particles cause intestinal damage and other adverse effects in zebrafish Danio rerio and nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Sci. Total Environ. 619: 1-8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.103
  31. Franzellitti S, Canesi L, Auguste M, Wathsala RH, Fabbri E. 2019. Microplastic exposure and effects in aquatic organisms: a physiological perspective. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 68: 37-51.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2019.03.009
  32. Hsieh SL, Wu YC, Xu RQ, Chen YT, Chen CW, Singhania RR, et al. 2021. Effect of polyethylene microplastics on oxidative stress and histopathology damages in Litopenaeus vannamei. Environ. Pollut. 288: 117800. 
  33. Espinosa C, Esteban MA, Cuesta A. 2019. Dietary administration of PVC and PE microplastics produces histological damage, oxidative stress and immunoregulation in European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax L.). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 95: 574-583.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2019.10.072
  34. Shan LP, Hu Y, Hu L, Liu HW, Liu L, Chen J. 2023. Involvement of microplastics in the conflict between host immunity defense and viral virulence: promoting the susceptibility of shrimp to WSSV infection. Environ. Sci. Technol. 57: 11634-11642.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c01566
  35. Han JE, Kim JE, Jo H, Eun JS, Lee C, Kim JH, et al. 2019. Increased susceptibility of white spot syndrome virus exposed Penaeus vannamei to Vibrio- parahaemolyticus causing acute hepatopancreatic necrosis disease. Aquaculture 512: 734333. 
  36. Kureshy N, Davis DA. 2002. Protein requirement for maintenance and maximum weight gain for the Pacific white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei. Aquaculture 204: 125-143.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(01)00649-4
  37. Nunan LM, Lightner DV. 2011. Optimized PCR assay for detection of white spot syndrome virus (WSSV). J. Virol. Methods 171: 318-321.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2010.11.015
  38. Bell TA, Lightner DV. 1988. A handbook of normal penaeid shrimp histology. World Aquaculture Society, Baton Rouge, LA, pp. 114. 
  39. Lightner DV. 1996. A handbook of shrimp pathology and diagnostic procedures for diseases of cultured penaeid shrimp. 
  40. Durand SV, Redman RM, Mohney LL, Tang-Nelson K, Bonami JR, Lightner DV. 2003. Qualitative and quantitative studies on the relative virus load of tails and heads of shrimp acutely infected with WSSV. Aquaculture 216: 9-18.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(02)00230-2
  41. Yu P, Liu Z, Wu D, Chen M, Lv W, Zhao Y. 2018. Accumulation of polystyrene microplastics in juvenile Eriocheir sinensis and oxidative stress effects in the liver. Aquat. Toxicol. 200: 28-36.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2018.04.015
  42. Welden NA, Cowie PR. 2016. Long-term microplastic retention causes reduced body condition in the langoustine, Nephrops norvegicus. Environ. Pollut. 218: 895-900.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.08.020
  43. Chae Y, Kim D, Choi MJ, Cho Y, An YJ. 2019. Impact of nano-sized plastic on the nutritional value and gut microbiota of whiteleg shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei via dietary exposure. Environ Int. 130: 104848. 
  44. Timilsina A, Adhikari K, Yadav AK, Joshi P, Ramena G, Bohara K. 2023. Effects of microplastics and nanoplastics in shrimp: mechanisms of plastic particle and contaminant distribution and subsequent effects after uptake. Sci. Total Environ. 894: 164999. 
  45. Lightner DV, Redman RM, Pantoja CR, Tang KFJ, Noble BL, Schofield P, et al. 2012. Historic emergence, impact and current status of shrimp pathogens in the Americas. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 110: 174-183.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jip.2012.03.006
  46. Patil PK, Geetha R, Ravisankar T, Avunje S, Solanki HG, Abraham TJ, et al. 2021. Economic loss due to diseases in Indian shrimp farming with special reference to Enterocytozoon hepatopenaei (EHP) and white spot syndrome virus (WSSV). Aquaculture 533: 736231. 
  47. Chakraborty S, Ghosh U. 2014. White spot syndrome virus (WSSV) in crustaceans: an overview of host-pathogen interaction. J. Mar. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. 31. doi:10.4172/2324-8661.1000121. 
  48. Mohan CV, Corsin F, Thakur PC, Padiyar PA, Madhusudan M, Turnbull JF, et al. 2002. Usefulness of dead shrimp specimens in studying the epidemiology of white spot syndrome virus (WSSV) and chronic bacterial infection. Dis. Aquat. Org. 50: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.3354/dao050001