DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Sustainable Fishery Certification Scheme and Fishery Improvement Projects

지속가능한 어업인증제도와 어업개선사업에 관한 연구

  • Zang Geun Kim (Consulting and Research Center for Sustainable Fisheries) ;
  • Jaebong Lee (West Sea Fisheries Research Institute, National Institute of Fisheries Science) ;
  • Doohyun Park (Ocean Outcomes) ;
  • Jeong-Ho Park (Division of Distant Water Fisheries Resources Research, National Institute of Fisheries Science) ;
  • Heewon Park (Division of Distant Water Fisheries Resources Research, National Institute of Fisheries Science) ;
  • Jung Hyun Lim (Division of Distant Water Fisheries Resources Research, National Institute of Fisheries Science) ;
  • Youjung Kwon (Division of Distant Water Fisheries Resources Research, National Institute of Fisheries Science)
  • 김장근 (지속가능어업자문연구센타) ;
  • 이재봉 (국립수산과학원 서해수산연구소) ;
  • 박두현 (오션아웃컴즈) ;
  • 박정호 (국립수산과학원 원양자원과) ;
  • 박희원 (국립수산과학원 원양자원과) ;
  • 임정현 (국립수산과학원 원양자원과) ;
  • 권유정 (국립수산과학원 원양자원과)
  • Received : 2024.06.03
  • Accepted : 2024.07.18
  • Published : 2024.08.31

Abstract

Despite international laws and government efforts, most of the world's fishery resources and ecosystems have continued to decline since the 1970s. In response, international non-governmental organizations have launched sustainable seafood movements and attempted various strategic approaches. These include the "boycott" strategy of the 1980s and 1990s, and the expansion of certified fisheries through Fishery Improvement Projects (FIPs) in the 2000s. According to data from the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC), currently there are 274 MSC-certified fisheries in 63 countries, covering 179 species, and 264 fisheries engaged in FIPs in 67 countries, covering 233 species. In Korea, the adoption of private fishery governance, which complements international and domestic fishery laws and government management, remains relatively low. Therefore, we examined private fishery governance with respect to its governance, interaction with laws, credibility, legitimacy, current status, and key considerations for its implementation. We emphasize the utilizing MSC fishery certification schemes as an audit approach to sustainability, implementating FIPs to address the fisheries sustainability gap, using councils for leadership, and securing government financing for fisheries with no market incentives.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 논문은 2024년도 국립수산과학원 수산과학연구사업(R2024003)의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구입니다.

References

  1. Arton A, Leiman A, Petrokofsky G, Toonen H and Longo C. 2020. What do we know about the impacts of the Marine Stewardship Council seafood ecolabelling program? A systematic map. Environ Evid 9, 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-020-0188-9.
  2. BAI (The Board of Audit and Inspection of Korea). 2015. Status of Certification System Operation. Audit report, BAI, Seoul, Korea, 1-77.
  3. Barr R, Bruner A and Edwards S. 2019. Fisheries improvement projects and small-scale fisheries: The need for a modified approach. Mar Policy 105, 109-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2019.02.053.
  4. Bush SR and Oosterveer P. 2019. Governing Sustainable Seafood. Routledge Press, London, U.K., 1-218.
  5. Butterworth DS. 2016. The South African experience with MSC certification: A perspective. Fish Res 182, 124-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2016.02.021.
  6. Cannon J, Sousa P, Katara I, Veiga P, Spear B, Beveridge D and Van Holt T. 2018. Fishery improvement projects: Performance over the past decade. Mar Policy 97, 179-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2018.06.007.
  7. CASS (Conservation Alliance for Seafood Solutions). 2022. Guidelines for Supporting Fishery Improvement Projects. CASS report, San Francisco, CA, U.S.A., 1-26.
  8. CEA Consulting. 2015. Summary Findings from the Global Landscape Review of Fishery Improvement Projects (FIPs). Retrieved from https://www.ceaconsulting.com/wp-content/uploads/Global-Landscape-Review-of-FIPs-Summary.pdf on Apr 1, 2024.
  9. CEA Consulting. 2020. 2020 Global Landscape Review of Fishery Improvement Projects. CEA Consulting report, San Francisco, CA, U.S.A., 1-221.
  10. Crespo JP and Crawford R. 2019. Bycatch and the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC): A review of the efficacy of the MSC certification scheme in tackling the bycatch of non-target species. Ninth Meeting of the Seabird Bycatch Working Group Report, Birdlift International, London, U.K., 1-39.
  11. Crona B, Kall S and Van Holt T. 2019. Fishery improvement projects as a governance tool for fisheries sustainability: A global comparative analysis. PLoS One 14, e0223054. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223054.
  12. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). 1999. Indicators for Sustainable Development of Marine Capture Fisheries. FAO Technical Guidelines for Responsible Fisheries, FAO, Rome, Italy, 1-68.
  13. Gulbrandsen LH. 2009. The emergence and effectiveness of the Marine Stewardship Council. Mar Policy 33, 654-660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2009.01.002.
  14. Gutierrez NL, Defeo O, Bush SR, Butterworth DS, Roheim CA and Punt AE. 2016. The current situation and prospects of fisheries certification and ecolabelling. Fish Res 182, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2016.05.004.
  15. Minderoo Foundation. 2021. The global fishing index: Assessing the sustainability of the world's marine fisheries. Perth, Western Australia, 1-60.
  16. IOI (International Ocean Institute). 2018. The future of ocean governance and capacity development. Essays in honor of Elisabeth Mann Borgese (1918-2002). IOI, Canada, 1-562.
  17. Johnsen JP, Holm P, Sinclair P and Bavington D. 2009. The cyborgization of the fisheries: On attempts to make fisheries management possible. MAST 7, 9-34.
  18. Karavias M. 2018. Interactions between international law and private fisheries certification. Transnatl Environ Law 7, 165-184. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102517000139.
  19. Lallemand P, Bergh M, Hansen M and Purves M. 2016. Estimating the economic benefits of MSC certification for the South African hake trawl fishery. Fish Res 182, 98-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2016.02.003.
  20. Macfadyen G, Hosch G, Kaysser N and Tagziria L. 2019. The IUU Fishing Index, 2019. Report of Poseidon Aquatic Resource Management Limited and the Global Initiative Against Transnational Organized Crime. Global Initiative Against Transnational Organized Crime, Geneva, Switzerland, 1-63.
  21. Macfadyen G and Hosch G. 2021. The IUU Fishing Index, 2021. Report of Global Initiative Against Transnational Organized Crime, Geneva, Switzerland, 1-68.
  22. Macfadyen G and Hosch G. 2023. The IUU Fishing Risk Index: 2023 Update. Report of Global Initiative Against Transnational Organized Crime, Geneva, Switzerland, 1-72.
  23. Melnychuk MC, Peterson E, Elliott M and Hilborn R. 2017. Fisheries management impacts on target species status. PNAS 114, 178-183. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1609915114.
  24. Melnychuk MC, Veneziano A, Lees S, Rasal J, Koerner LM, Hair P, Costalago D, Hively D, Jardim E and Longo C. 2022. Wild-caught fish populations targeted by MSC-certified fisheries have higher relative abundance than non-MSC populations. Front Mar Sci 9, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.818772.
  25. MSC (Marine Stewardship Council). 2017. Global Impacts Report 2017. MSC, London, U.K., 1-44.
  26. MSC (Marine Stewardship Council). 2022a. MSC Fisheries Standard Version 3.0. MSC, London, U.K., 1-147.
  27. MSC (Marine Stewardship Council). 2022b. MSC Client Document Checklist. MSC, London, U.K., 1-20.
  28. MSC (Marine Stewardship Council). 2023. Annual Report 2022-2023. MSC, London, U.K., 1-46
  29. MSC Track a Fishery. 2004. MSC Certification Information for Korea's Distant-water Fisheries. Retrieved from https://fisheryprogress.org/directory on Apr 15, 2024.
  30. OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2022. OECD Review of Fisheries 2022. Trade and Agriculture Directorate Fisheries Committee report, 1-112. https://doi.org/10.1787/9c3ad238-en.
  31. Our World in Data Team. 2023. SDG Tracker: Measuring Progress Towards the Sustainable Development Goals. https://heyzine.com/flip-book/33053fd460.html#page/1 on Apr 20, 2024.
  32. Stratoudakis Y, McConney P, Duncan J, Ghofar A, Gitonga N, Mohamed KS, Samoilys M, Symington K and Bourillon L. 2016. Fisheries certification in the developing world: Locks and keys or square pegs in round holes?. Fish Res 182, 39-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2015.08.021.
  33. Packer H, Schmidt J and Bailey M. 2020. Social networks and seafood sustainability governance: Exploring the relationship between social capital and the performance of fishery improvement projects. People Nat 2, 797-810. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10116.
  34. Parkes G, Young J A, Walmsley S F, Abel R, Harman J, Horvat P, Lem A, MacFarlane A, Mens M and Nolan C. 2010. Behind the signs-A global review of fish sustainability information schemes. Rev Fish Sci 18, 344-356. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641262.2010.516374.
  35. Parlee CE and Wiber MG. 2015. Whose audit is it? Harnessing the power of audit culture in conditions of legal pluralism. J Leg Plur Unoff Law 47, 96-111. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2014.990808.
  36. Pierucci A, Columbu S and Kell LT. 2022. A global review of MSC certification: Why fisheries withdraw?. Mar Pol 143, 105124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105124.
  37. Rayfuse R. 1999. 6 The interrelationship between the global instruments of international fisheries law. In: Developments in International Fisheries Law. Ellen H, ed. Brill Press, Leiden, Netherlands, 107-158.
  38. Roheim CA, Bush SR, Asche F, Sanchirico J and Uchida H. 2018. Evolution and future of the sustainable seafood market. Nat Sustain 1, 392-398. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0115-z.
  39. Samerwong P, Bush SR and Oosterveer P. 2017. Metagoverning aquaculture standards: A comparison of the GSSI, the ASEAN GAP, and the ISEAL. J Environ Dev 26, 429-451. https://doi.org/10.1177/1070496517736872.
  40. Samy-Kamal M. 2021. Fishery improvement projects (FIPs): A global analysis of status and performance. Fish Res 240, 105987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2021.105987.
  41. Schiller L and Bailey M. 2021. Rapidly increasing eco-certification coverage transforming management of world's tuna fisheries. Fish Fishe 22, 592-604. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12539.
  42. SFP (Sustainable Fisheries Partnership). 2023. SFP Target 75: 2022 Sectors Status Update. Retrieved from https://heyzine.com/flip-book/33053fd460.html#page/1 on Apr 20, 2024.
  43. Stratoudakis Y, McConney P, Duncan J, Ghofar A, Gitonga N, Mohamed KS, Samoilys M, Symington K and Bourillon L. 2016. Fisheries certification in the developing world: Locks and keys or square pegs in round holes?. Fish Res 182, 39-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2015.08.021.
  44. Sumaila UR. 2012. Seas, oceans and fisheries: A challenge for good governance. Round Table 101, 157-166. https://doi.org/10.1080/00358533.2012.661532.
  45. Sutton M and Wimpee L. 2008. Towards sustainable seafood: The evolution of a conservation movement. In: Seafood Ecolabelling. Ward T and Phillips B, eds. Wiley-Black-well Press, Hoboken, NJ, U.S.A., 403-415. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444301380.ch20.
  46. Travaille KT, Lindley J, Kendrick GA, Crowder LB and Clifton J. 2019. The market for sustainable seafood drives transformative change in fishery social-ecological systems. Global Environ Change 57, 101919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.05.003.
  47. van Putten I, Longo C, Arton A, Watson M, Anderson CM, Himes-Cornell A, Obregon C, Robinson L and van Steveninck T. 2020. Shifting focus: The impacts of sustainable seafood certification. PLoS One 15, e0235602. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233237.
  48. Washington S and Ababouch L. 2011. Private Standards and Certification in Fisheries and Aquaculture: Current Practice and Emerging Issues. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper 553, FAO, Rome, Italy, 1-181.
  49. WBA (World Benchmarking Alliance). 2023. Seafood Stewardship Index. Retrieved from https://www.worldbenchmark-ingalliance.org/publication/seafood-stewardship-index on May 17, 2024.
  50. Woronoff J. 2023. Legal and normative challenges behind sustainable seafood. In: Blue Planet Law. Garcia M and Cortes A, eds. Springer Nature Switzerland AG, Cham, Switzerland, 187-198. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24888-7_15.