Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow

Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society (대한견·주관절의학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Assessment of therapeutic clinical trials for proximal humeral fractures

  • Jonathan Koa (Division of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute) ;
  • Mohamad Y. Fares (Division of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute) ;
  • Mohammad Daher (Division of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute) ;
  • Joseph A. Abboud (Division of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute)
  • Received : 2023.06.24
  • Accepted : 2023.10.22
  • Published : 2024.06.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Proximal humeral fractures (PHFs) are a common injury among the older population. An ideal therapeutic protocol has yet to be developed, and numerous clinical trials are being conducted to find the best therapeutic approach. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the current body of knowledge available via interventional clinical trials. In December 2022, interventional clinical trials relating to PHFs on Clinicaltrials.gov were screened. Trial characteristics included duration, status, intervention, phase, outcomes, location, and study design. Publications associated with each trial were searched on PubMed/Medline using the ClinicalTrials.gov registry number. The final dataset comprised 64 trials. The most common trial status was completed (36%). The majority did not have a Food and Drug Administration-defined phase (67%), was randomized (81%), involved a single facility (72%), used a parallel assignment intervention model (80%), and used an open-label approach (45%). Eleven trials were associated with a publication, and the publication rate was 17%. Average enrollment was 86 participants, and mean trial duration was 51.4 months. Europe/UK/Russia/Turkey participated in the most trials (70%). Most of the trials were initiated after 2010 (87.5%). Procedure-related interventions (55%) were most common. Disability/function was the most common primary outcome assessed (61%). The low publication rate and the multitude of trials conducted after 2010 highlight the urgency and need for trial results to be published to establish an ideal therapeutic protocol. Since the majority of the trials involved a single institution and an open-label approach, reinforcing blinding and establishing multi-centered trials can improve the validity of the clinical trial results.

Keywords

References

  1. Court-Brown CM, Garg A, McQueen MM. The epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures. Acta Orthop Scand 2001;72:365-71.
  2. Barrett JA, Baron JA, Karagas MR, Beach ML. Fracture risk in the U.S. Medicare population. J Clin Epidemiol 1999;52:243-9.
  3. Handoll HH, Ollivere BJ, Rollins KE. Interventions for treating proximal humeral fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;12:CD000434.
  4. Chivot M, Lami D, Bizzozero P, Galland A, Argenson JN. Three- and four-part displaced proximal humeral fractures in patients older than 70 years: reverse shoulder arthroplasty or nonsurgical treatment. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2019;28:252-9.
  5. LaMartina J, Christmas KN, Simon P, et al. Difficulty in decision making in the treatment of displaced proximal humerus fractures: the effect of uncertainty on surgical outcomes. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2018;27:470-7.
  6. Schairer WW, Nwachukwu BU, Lyman S, Craig EV, Gulotta LV. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for treatment of proximal humerus fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2015;24:1560-6.
  7. Solberg BD, Moon CN, Franco DP, Paiement GD. Surgical treatment of three and four-part proximal humeral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009;91:1689-97.
  8. Sebastia-Forcada E, Cebrian-Gomez R, Lizaur-Utrilla A, Gil-Guillen V. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for acute proximal humeral fractures: a blinded, randomized, controlled, prospective study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2014;23:1419-26.
  9. Shukla DR, McAnany S, Kim J, Overley S, Parsons BO. Hemiarthroplasty versus reverse shoulder arthroplasty for treatment of proximal humeral fractures: a meta-analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2016;25:330-40.
  10. Hasty EK, Jernigan EW, Soo A, Varkey DT, Kamath GV. Trends in surgical management and costs for operative treatment of proximal humerus fractures in the elderly. Orthopedics 2017;40:e641-7.
  11. Acevedo DC, Vanbeek C, Lazarus MD, Williams GR, Abboud JA. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures: update on indications, technique, and results. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2014;23:279-89.
  12. Neer CS 2nd. Displaced proximal humeral fractures: I. classification and evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1970;52:1077-89.
  13. Olsson C, Petersson CJ. Clinical importance of comorbidity in patients with a proximal humerus fracture. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006;442:93-9.
  14. ClinicalTrials.gov [Internet]. National Library of Medicine; 2022[cited 2023 Dec 1]. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/
  15. Fares J, Kanojia D, Rashidi A, Ahmed AU, Balyasnikova IV, Lesniak MS. Diagnostic clinical trials in breast cancer brain metastases: barriers and innovations. Clin Breast Cancer 2019;19:383-91.
  16. Vanderbeek AM, Rahman R, Fell G, et al. The clinical trials landscape for glioblastoma: is it adequate to develop new treatments. Neuro Oncol 2018;20:1034-43.
  17. Johansson T. PTH 1-34 (teriparatide) may not improve healing in proximal humerus fractures. A randomized, controlled study of 40 patients. Acta Orthop 2016;87:79-82.
  18. Liaghat B, Brorson S. Effect of structured rehabilitation versus non-structured rehabilitation following non-surgical management of displaced proximal humerus fractures: a protocol for a randomised clinical trial. BMJ Open 2022;12:e064156.
  19. Cabana F, Page C, Svotelis A, Langlois-Michaud S, Tousignant M. Is an in-home telerehabilitation program for people with proximal humerus fracture as effective as a conventional face-to face rehabilitation program? A study protocol for a noninferiority randomized clinical trial. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil 2016;8:27.
  20. Wang X, Zhang H, Chen Y, et al. Is it useful and necessary to add a T2 paravertebral block to the regional anesthesia during proximal humeral fracture surgery in elderly patients? A prospective and randomized controlled trial. Front Surg 2022;9:755298.
  21. Wang X, Zhang H, Xie Z, Zhang Q, Jiang W, Zhang J. The effectiveness of additional thoracic paravertebral block in improving the anesthetic effects of regional anesthesia for proximal humeral fracture surgery in elderly patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2020;21:204.
  22. Launonen AP, Fjalestad T, Laitinen MK, et al. Nordic Innovative Trials to Evaluate osteoPorotic Fractures (NITEP) Collaboration: the Nordic DeltaCon Trial protocol-non-operative treatment versus reversed total shoulder arthroplasty in patients 65 years of age and older with a displaced proximal humerus fracture: a prospective, randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2019;9:e024916.
  23. Fjalestad T, Iversen P, Hole MO, Smedsrud M, Madsen JE. Clinical investigation for displaced proximal humeral fractures in the elderly: a randomized study of two surgical treatments: reverse total prosthetic replacement versus angular stable plate Philos (The DELPHI-trial). BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2014;15:323.
  24. Fraser AN, Bjordal J, Wagle TM, et al. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty is superior to plate fixation at 2 years for displaced proximal humeral fractures in the elderly: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2020;102:477-85.
  25. Bones I, Karlberg AC, Liljeholm M, Fraser AN, Madsen JE, Fjalestad T. Pegs not superior to screws for fixation of fractures of the proximal humerus. J Orthop Surg Res 2022;17:66.
  26. Fjalestad T, Hole MO, Hovden IA, Blucher J, Stromsoe K. Surgical treatment with an angular stable plate for complex displaced proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial. J Orthop Trauma 2012;26:98-106.
  27. Launonen AP, Sumrein BO, Reito A, et al. Operative versus non-operative treatment for 2-part proximal humerus fracture: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. PLoS Med 2019;16:e1002855.
  28. Launonen AP, Lepola V, Flinkkila T, et al. Conservative treatment, plate fixation, or prosthesis for proximal humeral fracture: a prospective randomized study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2012;13:167.
  29. Helfen T, Siebenburger G, Mayer M, Bocker W, Ockert B, Haasters F. Operative treatment of 2-part surgical neck fractures of the proximal humerus (AO 11-A3) in the elderly: cement augmented locking plate PhilosTM vs. proximal humerus nail MultiLoc®. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2016;17:448.
  30. Hengg C, Nijs S, Klopfer T, et al. Cement augmentation of the proximal humerus internal locking system in elderly patients: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2019;139:927-42.
  31. Howard L, Berdusco R, Momoli F, et al. Open reduction internal fixation vs non-operative management in proximal humerus fractures: a prospective, randomized controlled trial protocol. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2018;19:299.
  32. Haislup BD, Rate WR, Civilette MD, Cohen AS, Bodendorfer BM, Gould HP. The 100 most impactful articles on the rotator cuff: an altmetric analysis of online media. J Exp Orthop 2022;9:92.
  33. Freehill MT, Murray IR, Calvo E, Ladermann A, Srikumaran U. Shoulder surgery postoperative immobilization: an international survey of shoulder surgeons. Biology (Basel) 2023;12:291.
  34. Vicenti G, Bizzoca D, Zaccari D, et al. Choice of treatments of the coronal shear fractures of the humerus: a national survey of Italian AO members. Injury 2023;54 Suppl 1:S78-84.
  35. Karimi D, Houkjaer L, Gundtoft P, Brorson S, Viberg B. Positive predictive value of humeral fractures in the Danish National Patient Registry. Dan Med J 2023;70:A10220612.
  36. Sumrein BO, Berg HE, Launonen AP, et al. Mortality following proximal humerus fracture-a nationwide register study of 147,692 fracture patients in Sweden. Osteoporos Int 2023;34:349-56.
  37. Mattila H, Keskitalo T, Simons T, Ibounig T, Ramo L. Epidemiology of 936 humeral shaft fractures in a large Finnish trauma center. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2023;32:e206-15.
  38. Van Bergen SH, Mahabier KC, Van Lieshout EM, et al. Humeral shaft fracture: systematic review of non-operative and operative treatment. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2023;143:5035-54.
  39. Cosic F, Kirzner N, Edwards E, Page R, Kimmel L, Gabbe B. The translated proximal humerus fracture: a comparison of operative and nonoperative management. J Orthop Trauma 2023;37:e341-8.
  40. Mayir B, Bilecik T, Cakir T, et al. Analysis of the publishing rate and the number of citations of general surgery dissertations. Turk J Surg 2017;33:33-6.
  41. Martinez-Catalan N. Conservative treatment of proximal humerus fractures: when, how, and what to expect. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2023;16:75-84.
  42. Walter N, Szymski D, Kurtz SM, et al. Proximal humerus fractures: epidemiology, comparison of mortality rates after surgical versus non-surgical treatment, and analysis of risk factors based on Medicare registry data. Bone Joint Res 2023;12:103-12.
  43. Kirkley A, Griffin S, Dainty K. Scoring systems for the functional assessment of the shoulder. Arthroscopy 2003;19:1109-20.
  44. Angst F, Schwyzer HK, Aeschlimann A, Simmen BR, Goldhahn J. Measures of adult shoulder function: Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (DASH) and its short version (QuickDASH), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Society standardized shoulder assessment form, Constant (Murley) Score (CS), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), Shoulder Disability Questionnaire (SDQ), and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2011;63 Suppl 11:S174-88.
  45. Day SJ, Altman DG. Statistics notes: blinding in clinical trials and other studies. BMJ 2000;321:504.