Nuclear Engineering and Technology

Korean Nuclear Society (한국원자력학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The volcanic aspect on determining Site of nuclear power plant in Indonesia: Gap analysis between standard and regulations

  • Widjanarko (Research Center for Safety, Metrology, and Nuclear Quality Technology) ;
  • Budi Santoso (Research Center for Safety, Metrology, and Nuclear Quality Technology) ;
  • Rismiyanto (Research Center for Safety, Metrology, and Nuclear Quality Technology) ;
  • Kurnia Anzhar (Research Center for Nuclear Reactor Technology) ;
  • Joko Waluyo (Research Center for Safety, Metrology, and Nuclear Quality Technology) ;
  • Gustini H. Sayid (Research Center for Safety, Metrology, and Nuclear Quality Technology) ;
  • Khusnul Khotimah (Research Center for Safety, Metrology, and Nuclear Quality Technology) ;
  • Nicholas Bertony Saputra (Research Center for Safety, Metrology, and Nuclear Quality Technology) ;
  • Agus Teguh Pranoto (Research Center for Safety, Metrology, and Nuclear Quality Technology) ;
  • Hadi Suntoko (Research Center for Nuclear Reactor Technology) ;
  • Siti Alimah (Research Center for Nuclear Reactor Technology) ;
  • Sriyana (Directorate of Environment, Maritime, Natural Resources, and Nuclear Policy) ;
  • Roni Cahya Ciputra (Research Center for Nuclear Material and Radioactive Waste Technology) ;
  • Alfitri Meliana (Directorate of Laboratory Management, Research Facilities, and Science and Technology Park, National Research and Innovation Agency)
  • Received : 2023.07.04
  • Accepted : 2024.04.09
  • Published : 2024.07.25
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The development of nuclear power plants is in three phases. The first phase is a consideration before the decision on the NPP construction program is approved, the second phase is the preparatory work for making contracts and preparing for the construction of NPP after the NPP construction policy is approved, and the third phase is contracting, licensing and building the first NPP. As a volcanically active country, Indonesia contains over 130 active volcanoes that are part of the Pacific Ring of Fire. The volcanic aspect is one of the safety factors considered while deciding the location of an NPP. Research on the potential of natural external risks to the determination of nuclear power plants in Indonesia, including the volcanic aspect, has been conducted based on the safety reference or safety guide of the IAEA and the Nuclear Energy Regulatory Body (BAPETEN) Regulation. Due to technological advancements, safety needs have evolved so the existing Indonesia National Standard (SNI) must be updated to comply with BAPETEN regulations. The substance in SNI 18-2034-1990 relating to volcanic features seems less relevant in actual conditions, given that more complete and exact criteria for determining a site guarantee the safety and health of residents and surrounding the environment site. The study intends to conduct a gap analysis of volcanic issues in SNI and volcanic regulations. The method used is identification requirements for volcanic aspects in SNI 18-2034-1990 about Determining Site of Nuclear Reactor Guidance with BAPETEN Chairman Regulation (BCR) number 4 of 2018 about Nuclear Installation Site Evaluation Safety Provisions and BCR number 5 of 2015 about Evaluation of Nuclear Installation Sites for Volcanic Aspects, and analysis uses a qualitative method of inductive techniques. The outcome of this research applies to suggesting a revision of SNI number 18-2034-1990, especially the volcanic aspect.

Keywords

References

  1. R. Indonesia, Rencana pembangunan jangka menengah nasional 2020-2024, Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia 303 (2020). https://jdih.bappenas.go.id/peraturan/detailperaturan/1037.
  2. S. Suaedah, A.T. Hapsari, D. Mariana, Research Mapping based on National Research Priorities (PRN) Brin Strategic Plan 2022-2024, (n.d.). https://doi.org/10.37010/pnd.v1i3.941.
  3. IAEA, Country Nuclear Power Profiles 2018 Edition Indonesia, IAEA, 2018. https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/cnpp2018/countryprofiles/Indonesia/Indonesia.htm. (Accessed 28 March 2024).
  4. H. SusiatiSriyana, M.S. BahariFepriadi, M.J. Birmani, D. Priambodo, Y. D. AnggoroSuparman, A.C. Lesmana, A. Aryanto, Pembangkit Listrik Tenaga Nuklir di Indonesia (Upaya Berkelanjutan Menuju Net Zero Emission), Unisma Press, 2023, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7905583. Malang.
  5. B. Wang, F. Liu, C. Zhang, Y. Qiao, Y. Liu, Y. Yang, Y. Wang, Z. Shang, Q. Shi, Site selection considerations of spent nuclear fuel reprocessing plant in China, Energy Proc. 39 (2013) 382-386.
  6. A. Siti, S. Hadi, A. Kurnia, M. June, Study of the potential of natural external hazard on nuclear plant determination in Indonesia: Case study of Bangka sites. https://inis.iaea.org/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/52/004/52004401.pdf, 2018.
  7. H. Suntoko, Kajian Aspek Keselamatan Tapak Pltn di Ujunglemahabang, sebagai Lokasi yang Aman dari Bahaya Kejadian Ekternal Alamiah, in: Jurnal Pengembangan Energi Nuklir, vol. 12, 2010. https://jurnal.batan.go.id/index.php/jpen/article/view/1450.
  8. C.B. Connor, Volcanic hazards in site evaluation for nuclear installations. https://www.iaea.org/publications/8774/volcanic-hazards-in-site-evaluation-for-nuclear-installations, 2012.
  9. S. Setyowati, B.S. Hadi, A. Ashari, Pengembangan Sistem Informasi Bahaya Erupsi untuk Pengelolaan Kebencanaan di Lereng Selatan Gunungapi Merapi, Majalah Geografi Indonesia 27 (2013) 138-148. https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/mgi/article/view/13427.
  10. A.R. McBirney, L. Serva, M. Guerra, C.B. Connor, Volcanic and seismic hazards at a proposed nuclear power site in central Java, J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res. 126 (2003) 11-30.
  11. W.P. Aspinall, S.J. Charbonnier, C.B. Connor, L. Connor, A. Costa, L.M. Courtland, H. Delgado Granados, A. Godoy, K. Hibino, B.E. Hill, Volcanic hazard assessments for nuclear installations: methods and examples in site evaluation. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511635380.026, 2016.
  12. H. Suntoko, Pemilihan Tapak PLTN di Semenanjung Muria, Jurnal Pengembangan Energi Nuklir 1 (1999) 173-185. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/139555-none-fcb31c1a.pdf.
  13. A.R. McBirney, L. Serva, M. Guerra, C.B. Connor, Volcanic and seismic hazards at a proposed nuclear power site in central Java, J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res. 126 (2003) 11-30, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-0273(03)00114-8.
  14. W.A. Draniswari, F. Pratiwi, N. Ngadenin, I.G. Sukadana, T.B. Adimedha, R. C. Ciputra, E.N.S. Argianto, E. Aminarthi, V.D. Supraba, Distribution and mineralogical characteristic of raya volcanics, West Kalimantan, EKSPLORIUM 42 (2021) 77, https://doi.org/10.17146/eksplorium.2021.42.2.6511.
  15. I.G. Sukadana, Y.S.B. Susilo, A. Heriwaseso, E.E. Alhakim, Probabilistic analysis of theLaharic hazard assessment on experimental power reactor, puspiptek area, Serpong, in: J Phys Conf Ser, Institute of Physics Publishing, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1363/1/012031.
  16. BSN, Peraturan BSN 6 tahun 2018, BSN, jakarta. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Detai ls/171569/peraturan-bsn-no-6-tahun-2018, 2018.
  17. D.F. Channon, T. Sammut-Bonnici, Gap analysis, in: Wiley Encyclopedia of Management, Wiley, 2015, pp. 1-2, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118785317.weom120109.
  18. I.T. Rusmanatmojo, B. Rohman, R.E. Harianto, A. Awalludin, The challenges from regulatory review and assessment of experimental power reactor site in Indonesia, in: AIP Conf Proc, AIP Publishing LLC, 2021 060018.
  19. A.N. Torres, A.L.M. Del Pozzo, G. Groppelli, M. del C.J. Viera, Risk scenarios for a future eruption in the Chichinautzin monogenetic volcanic field, South M'exico City, J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res. 433 (2023) 107733.
  20. C.-H. Chen, J.-S. Shen, Discussions on "the IAEA guidelines for assessing volcanic hazards at nuclear facilities,", J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res. 134 (2004) 339-342.
  21. J. Biggs, M.E. Pritchard, Global volcano monitoring: what does it mean when volcanoes deform? Elements 13 (2017) 17-22.
  22. T. Nakamura, S. Nakada, K. Iwata, T. Ono, F. Hamasaki, Safety assessment of nuclear power plant under volcanic phenomena-Background and technical basis of the revision of JEAG4625, J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 53 (2016) 929-943.
  23. T. Nakamura, S. Nakada, K. Iwata, T. Ono, F. Hamasaki, Safety assessment of nuclear power plant under volcanic phenomena part2-revision of JEAG4625 on the safety assessment of severe accident measures equipment and maintenance programme, J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 54 (2017) 1277-1291.
  24. A.A. Eluyemi, S. Sharma, S.J. Olotu, D.E. Falebita, A.A. Adepelumi, I.A. Tubosun, F.I. Ibitoye, S. Baruah, A GIS-based site investigation for nuclear power plants (NPPs) in Nigeria, Sci Afr 7 (2020) e00240.
  25. A.C.M. Volentik, C.B. Connor, L.J. Connor, C. Bonadonna, Aspects of volcanic hazard assessment for the Bataan nuclear power plant, Luzon Peninsula, Philippines. Volcanic and Tectonic Hazard Assessment for Nuclear Facilities, 2009, pp. 229-256.
  26. M. Ibrion, N. Paltrinieri, A.R. Nejad, Learning from non-failure of Onagawa nuclear power station: an accident investigation over its life cycle, Results in Engineering 8 (2020) 100185.
  27. A.M. Abudeif, A.A.A. Moneim, A.F. Farrag, Multicriteria decision analysis based on analytic hierarchy process in GIS environment for siting nuclear power plant in Egypt, Ann. Nucl. Energy 75 (2015) 682-692.
  28. BSN, SNI 18-2034-1990, Pedoman Penentuan Tapak Reaktor Nuklir, 1982. https://pesta.bsn.go.id/produk/detail/2383-sni18-2034-1990.
  29. BAPETEN, Peraturan Kepala Badan Pengawas Tenaga Nuklir Nomor 5 Tahun 2015 Tentang Evaluasi Tapak Instalasi Nuklir Untuk Aspek Kegunungapian, 2015. https://jdih.bapeten.go.id/id/dokumen/peraturan/peraturan-kepala-badan-no-5-tahun-2015-tahun-2015-tentang-evaluasi-tapak-instalasi-nuklir-untuk-aspek-kegunungapian.
  30. BAPETEN, Peraturan Badan Pengawas Tenaga Nuklir Republik Indonesia Nomor 4 Tahun 2018 Tentang Ketentuan Keselamatan Evaluasi Tapak Instalasi Nuklir, 2018. https://jdih.bapeten.go.id/unggah/dokumen/peraturan/372-full.pdf.
  31. Global Volcanism Program, Volcanoes of the World Database (V. 5.1.5; 15 December 2023, Smithsonian Institution, 2023. https://volcano.si.edu/gvp_votw.cfm.
  32. S. Loughlin, S. Barsotti, C. Bonadonna, E. Calder, 3.2 Geophysical risks: volcanic activity, in: Science for Disaster Risk Management 2017: Knowing Better and Losing Less, 2017, pp. 151-190. https://drmkc.jrc.ec.europa.eu/portals/0/Knowledge/ScienceforDRM/ch03_s01/ch03_s01_subch0302.pdf.
  33. J. Marti Molist, Assessing Volcanic Hazard: A Review, vol. 1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190699420.013.32.
  34. M. Yusuf, Gunung Kelud. Haura Publishing, Sukabumi, 2021. https://www.academia.edu/50254144/GuGunu_Kelud_Proses_dan_Budayanya.
  35. I. Pratomo, Klasifikasi gunung api aktif Indonesia, studi kasus Dari beberapa letusan gunung api dalam sejarah, Jurnal Geologi Indonesia 1 (2006) 209-227.
  36. A.S. Suryani, Dampak negatif abu vulkanik terhadap lingkungan dan Kesehatan, Info Singkat Kesejahteraan Sosial 6 (2014) 9-12. https://berkas.dpr.go.id/puslit/files/info_ssingka/Info%20Singkat-VI-4-II-P3DI-Februari-2014-67.pdf.
  37. E.S.D.M. PVMBG, Multiplatform application for hazard mitigation and assessment (MAGMA) Indonesia, PVMBG ESDM. https://magma.vsi.esdm.go.id/, 2024.