Nuclear Engineering and Technology

Korean Nuclear Society (한국원자력학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Does the nuclear engineering field perform worse in utilizing women? Evidence from South Korea

  • Jihye Kam (Department of Social Studies Education, Sungshin Women's University) ;
  • Sungyeol Choi (Department of Nuclear Engineering, Seoul National University) ;
  • Soohyung Lee (Graduate School of International Studies, Seoul National University, Global Labor Organization)
  • Received : 2023.08.24
  • Accepted : 2024.02.13
  • Published : 2024.07.25
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Despite its remarkable socioeconomic development, South Korea underperforms in terms of female labor force participation and women in leadership positions. As women appear to avoid nuclear engineering, we aim to evaluate its relative performance in attracting women to its labor force compared to other college majors. Using college-major level information from 2000, we test whether the female faculty share in nuclear engineering is lower than its counterparts. Although nuclear engineering has one of the lowest female faculty shares, its share exceeds that of agricultural science, business and economics, chemical engineering, chemistry, civil engineering, and industrial engineering once we properly control for gender composition among students and other compounding factors. In other words, once female students major in nuclear engineering, they are less likely to leave their fields compared to their counterparts in other disciplines. This result implies that if the nuclear engineering field aims to attract more women to its workforce, it is important to target them from the early stage of their careers.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) and the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MOTIE) of the Republic of Korea (No. 20224000000120).

References

  1. Nuclear Energy Agency, Gender Balance in the Nuclear Sector (NEA No. 7583), OECD Publishing, Paris, 2023.
  2. International Atomic Energy Agency, Toward Closing the Gender Gap in Nuclear Science, IAEA Bulletin, Vienna, February 11, 2019.
  3. International Atomic Energy Agency, Strengthening Capacity of Women in Nuclear Security Worldwide, IAEA Webinar, Vienna, July 21, 2021.
  4. P.C. Stern, T. Dietz, L. Kalof, Value orientations, gender, and environmental concern, Environ. Behav. 25 (5) (1993) 322-348. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916593255002
  5. M. Iqbal, R. Moss, I. Van Woerden, Peoples' Perception towards nuclear energy, Energies 15 (12) (2022) 4397.
  6. A. Sundstrom, A.M. McCright, Women and nuclear energy: examining the gender divide in opposition to nuclear power among Swedish citizens and politicians, Energy Res. Social Sci. 11 (2016) 29-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.08.008
  7. V.P. Nguyen, M.S. Yim, Examination of different socioeconomic factors that contribute to the public acceptance of nuclear energy, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 50 (5) (2018) 767-772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2018.02.005
  8. B.J. Canes, H.S. Rosen, Following in her footsteps? Faculty gender composition and women's choice of college majors, Ind. Labor Relat. Rev. 48 (3) (1995) 486-504. https://doi.org/10.1177/001979399504800308
  9. D.S. Rothstein, Do female faculty influence female students' educational and labor market attainments? Ind. Labor Relat. Rev. 48 (3) (1995) 515-530. https://doi.org/10.1177/001979399504800310
  10. E.P. Bettinger, B.T. Long, Do faculty serve as role models? The impact of instructor gender on female students, Am. Econ. Rev.: Papers and Proceedings 95 (2) (2005) 152-157. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282805774670149
  11. F. Hoffman, P. Oreopoulos, A professor like me: the influence of instructor gender on college achievement, J. Hum. Resour. 44 (2) (2009) 479-494.
  12. S.E. Carrell, M.E. Page, J.E. West, Sex and science: how professor gender perpetuates the gender gap, Q. J. Econ. 125 (3) (2010) 1101-1144. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2010.125.3.1101
  13. A.L. Griffith, Faculty gender in the college classroom: does it matter for achievement and major choice? South. Econ. J. 81 (1) (2014) 211-231. https://doi.org/10.4284/0038-4038-2012.100
  14. D.G. Smith, C.S. Turner, N. Osei-Kofi, S. Richards, Interrupting the usual: successful strategies for hiring diverse faculty, J. High Educ. 75 (2) (2004) 133-160. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2004.11778900
  15. R. van der Lee, N. Ellemers, Gender contributes to personal research funding success in The Netherlands, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112 (40) (2015) 12349-12353. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1510159112
  16. L.K. Kewley, Closing the gender gap in the Australian astronomy workforce, Nat. Astron. 5 (2021) 615-620. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-021-01341-z
  17. J.M. Jebsen, K.N. Baines, R.A. Oliver, I. Jayasinghe, Dismantling barriers faced by women in STEM, Nat. Chem. 14 (2022) 1203-1206. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-022-01072-2
  18. Y.M. Nam, WiN Korea chapter report, in: The 29th WiN Global Annual Conference, Tokyo, Japan, 2022. May 23-26.
  19. Educational, Official Act, Law No.19065, Ministry of Government Legislation, South Korea, 2022.
  20. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, Women in Science, UNESCO Institute for Statistics, Montreal, 2020 (FS/2020/SCI/60).
  21. Korea Atomic Industrial Forum, Survey on the Status of Nuclear Industries in 2021 (2022M2B5A1080842), Ministry of Science and ICT, Seoul, 2022.
  22. Korean Educational Development Institute, Education Statistics 2000-2022 (Ministry of Statistics Approval Number: 334001), KEDI Korean Educational Statistics Service, Sejong, 2022.
  23. W.M. Williams, S.J. Ceci, National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112 (17) (2015) 5360-5365. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1418878112