문화기술의 융합 (The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology)

  • 제10권4호
  • /
  • Pages.271-283
  • /
  • 2024
  • /
  • 2384-0358(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-0366(eISSN)
국제문화기술진흥원 (The International Promotion Agency of Culture Technology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

특수아동을 위한 교육실행에서 장애인교육법(IDEA)-인간작업모델(MOHO)간의 공통된 핵심원리 탐색

Exploring the Alignment between MOHO and IDEA Principles: A Qualitative Analysis in Special Education Settings

  • 한민경 (대구대학교 유아특수교육학과) ;
  • 이주영 (전북대학교 아동학과)
  • Min Kyung Han ;
  • Juyoung Lee (Dept. of Child Studies, Jeonbuk National University)
  • 투고 : 2024.04.20
  • 심사 : 2024.06.10
  • 발행 : 2024.07.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

연구는 인간 작업 모델(MOHO)과 장애인 교육법(IDEA)의 여섯 가지 원칙 간의 공통된 핵심원리를 도출하여, 다학제간 접근을 통한 특수교육 실행 활성화의 시사점을 찾는 것이다. 이를 위해 다학문적 특수교육 접근에 초점을 맞추어 인간 작업 모델(MOHO)과 장애인 교육법(IDEA) 원칙 간의 연결을 확립하고자 하였다. 인간작업 모델(MOHO), 장애인 교육법(IDEA) 원칙 및 작업치료사와 특수교육교사 간의 협력에 대한 학술 문헌을 조사하고 분석하였다. 주제 분석을 통해 반복되는 주제와 관계를 식별하여 인간 작업 모델(MOHO)의 이론적 기초와 장애인 교육법(IDEA)과의 공통된 핵심원리를 도출하였다. 이를 통해 작업치료의 핵심이론인 인간작업모델이 특수교육 활동에 접목되는 원리를 이해함을 지원하여, 특수교사-재활치료사들 간의 원활한 협력과 의사소통을 강화하는데 기초자료를 제공하였다.

The study seeks to examine the alignment between the Model of Human Occupation (MOHO) and the Six Principles of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) through qualitative analysis. The study utilizes a qualitative methodology that entails a comprehensive review of the existing literature to establish connections between MOHO and Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) principles, with a specific focus on collaborative special education environments. Data collection involves examining academic literature on MOHO, Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) principles, and the partnership between occupational therapists and special education teachers. Thematic analysis is employed to identify recurrent themes and relationships, offering valuable insights into the theoretical foundations of MOHO and its compatibility with the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA)The Model of Human Occupation (MOHO) highlights the significance of active engagement and meaningful participation in inclusive education. It promotes the development of independence and self-determination in occupational performance for children with special needs. Moreover, MOHO stresses the importance of offering tailored support and adjustments for these children.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. P. H. Lipkin, et al., "The Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) for Children With Special Educational Needs," PEDIATRICS, Vol. 136, No.6, pp. 1650-1662, 2015. 
  2. A. Jones, and C. Brown, "Collaborating for Success: Strategies for Effective Collaboration Between Occupational Therapists and Special Education Teachers," Journal of Occupational Therapy in Schools and Early Intervention, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 145-158, 2019. 
  3. V. Berry, and C. B. Sharma, C.B. "Case study: impact of interdisciplinary interventions in a 9-year-old male child with autism spectrum disorder", Advances in Autism, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 163-177, 2022. 
  4. D. P. Hallahan, P. C. Pullen, and J. M. Kauffman, Exceptional learners: An introduction to special education (15th ed.). Pearson Education. 2023. 
  5. J. O'Brien, E. Asselin, K. Fortier, and R. Janzegers, "Using Therapeutic Reasoning to Apply the Model of Human Occupation in Pediatric Occupational Therapy Practice," Journal of Occupational Therapy. Schools. 348-365, 2010. 
  6. R. Hughes, Socioeconomic diversity and physical activity: Using the Model of Human Occupation to explore physical activity behaviour. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Liverpool, 2021
  7. K. E., Samaneh, H. M., Afsoon, S. Narges, Y. Farzaneh, M. Tayebe and Z. Masoome, "Participation in Peer-Play Activities Among Children With Specific Learning Disability: A Randomized Controlled Trial," American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 73, 2019. 
  8. J. Park, J., Gross, D. P., Rayani, F., Norris, C. M., Roberts, M. R., James, C., and Esmail, S. Model of human occupation as a framework for implementation of motivational interviewing in occupational rehabilitation. Work, Vol. 62, No.4, pp. 629-641, 2019. 
  9. M. Shahbazi and S. K. Esmaeili, "Application of the Model of Human Occupation(MOHO) in Psychosocial Needs of Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes: A Case Study," Function & Disability Journal, Vol. 6, 2023. 
  10. D. Maciver, C. Hunter, L. Johnston, and K. Forsyth, "Using Stakeholder Involvement, Expert Knowledge and Naturalistic Implementation to Co-Design a Complex Intervention to Support Children's Inclusion and Participation in Schools: The CIRCLE Framework," Children (Basel). 2021 Vol. 11, No. 8, p. 217, 2021. 
  11. Saied, and A. S. Rusu, Theoretical Overview Of The Practicum Programs For Special Education Pre-Service Teachers. In I. Albulescu, &C. Stan (Eds.), Education, Reflection, Development, European Proceedings of Educational Sciences, Vol 2, pp. 609-616, European Publisher. 2022 
  12. M. L. Yell, and M. R. Bradley, "Why We Have Special Education Law: Legal Challenges to the IDEA," Exceptionaliy, Vol. 32, No, 2, pp. 109-122, 2019. 
  13. C. Pauline, and X. Fung, "A review on the case studies of using the model of human occupation," Asian Journal of Social Health and Behavior, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2020. 
  14. S. Lee, R. Taylor, G. Kielhofner, and G. Fisher, "Theory Use in Practice: A National Survey of Therapists Who Use the Model of Human Occupation," The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, Vol. 62, No. 1. pp. 106-117, 2008. 
  15. R. Thyagarajan, N. Swathi, R. Shanthi, K. Keerthi, M. Akhila Shree, Sd. Safa, & Rithika T, "Effectiveness of Multidisciplinary Team Intervention in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Pilot Study," International Journal of Indian Psychology, Vol, 11, No.3. 2022. 
  16. L. Smith, et al., "The Impact of Collaboration Between Occupational Therapists and Special Education Teachers on Student Outcomes," Journal of Occupational Therapy, Schools, & Early Intervention, 10(1), 45-56, 2017. 
  17. J. V. D'Agostinio, R. M. Rodgers, R. M., and A.C. Karpinski, The role of formative assessment in student achievement. In J. Hattie & E. M. Anderman (Eds.), Visible learning guide to student achievement: Schools edition (pp. 126- 131). Routledge. 2020. 
  18. C. A. Espin, K.R.S. McMaster, and M. M,.S., & Wayman, A measure of success: The influence of curriculum-based measurement on education. University of Minnesota Press. 2012. 
  19. L. S. Fuchs, D. Fuchs, C. L. Hamlett, and P. M. Stecker, "Bringing data-based individualization to scale: A call for the next-generation technology of teacher supports," Journal of Learning Disabilities, Vol. 54, No, 5, 319-333, 2021.