Anatomy and Cell Biology

Korean Association of Anatomists (대한해부학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Atlanto-occipital assimilation: embryological basis and its clinical significance

  • Hari Hara Hanusun N (Department of Anatomy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Akanksha Singh (Department of Anatomy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Pooja Poddar (Department of Anatomy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Jessy J P (Department of Anatomy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Neerja Rani (Department of Anatomy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Hitesh Gurjar (Department of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Seema Singh (Department of Anatomy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences)
  • Received : 2023.08.29
  • Accepted : 2023.10.30
  • Published : 2024.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Atlanto-occipital assimilation is an osseous embryological anomaly of the craniovertebral junction in which the atlas (C1) is fused to the occiput of skull. Embryologically, this assimilation may happen due to failure of the segmentation and separation of the caudal occipital and the cranial cervical sclerotome. The segmentation clock is maintained by NOTCH and WNT signalling pathways along with Hox genes and retinoic acid. This condition is likely to be a consequence of mutation in above mentioned genes. The knowledge of this assimilation may be crucial for the clinicians as it may lead to various neurovascular symptoms. The present case report involves the analysis of atlanto-occipital assimilation with its clinical significance and embryological basis.

Keywords

References

  1. Jadhav SD, Ambali MP, Patil RJ, Doshi MA, Roy PP. Assimilation of atlas in Indian dry skulls. J Krishna Inst Med Sci Univ 2012;1:102-6. https://doi.org/10.4103/2277-4025.298019
  2. Ranade AV, Rai R, Prabhu LV, Kumaran M, Pai MM. Atlas assimilation: a case report. Neuroanatomy 2007;6:32-3.
  3. Guebert GM, Yochum TR, Rowe LJ. Congenital anomalies and normal skeletal variants. In: Yochum TR, Rowe LJ, editors. Essentials of Skeletal Radiology. Williams and Wilkens; 1987. p.197-306.
  4. Bodon G, Glasz T, Olerud C. Anatomical changes in occipitalization: is there an increased risk during the standard posterior approach? Eur Spine J 2013;22(Suppl 3):S512-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2768-7
  5. Sadler TW. Langman's medical embryology. 14th ed. Wolters Kluwer; 2019.
  6. Carlson BM. Human embryology and developmental biology. 6th ed. Elsevier; 2019.
  7. Leucht P, Kim JB, Amasha R, James AW, Girod S, Helms JA. Embryonic origin and Hox status determine progenitor cell fate during adult bone regeneration. Development 2008;135:2845-54. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.023788
  8. Harcourt BT, Mitchell TC. Occipitalization of the atlas. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1990;13:532-8.
  9. Tachdjian MO. Congenital anomalies of the occiput and cervical spine. In: Tachdjian MO, editor. Pediatric orthopedics. WB Saunders; 1990. p.874-5.
  10. Chandraraj S, Briggs CA. Failure of somite differentiation at the cranio-vertebral region as a cause of occipitalization of the atlas. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1992;17:1249-51. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199210000-00021
  11. Warner WC. Pediatric cervical spine. In: Canale ST, Campbell WC, editors. Campbell's operative orthopaedics. 10th ed. Mosby; 2003. p.1736-1737.
  12. Wang S, Wang C, Liu Y, Yan M, Zhou H. Anomalous vertebral artery in craniovertebral junction with occipitalization of the atlas. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009;34:2838-42. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b4fb8b
  13. Hensinger RN. Osseous anomalies of the craniovertebral junction. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1986;11:323-33. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198605000-00006
  14. Hayes M, Parker G, Ell J, Sillence D. Basilar impression complicating osteogenesis imperfecta type IV: the clinical and neuroradiological findings in four cases. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1999;66:357-64. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.66.3.357
  15. Greenberg AD. Atlanto-axial dislocations. Brain 1968;91:655-84. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/91.4.655