DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Zirconia removable prosthesis using a milled bar in patient with mandible anterior edentulous area with severe alveolar bone resorption: a case report

치조골 흡수가 심한 하악 전치부 부분 무치악 환자에서 Milled-bar를 이용한 지르코니아 가철성 보철물 수복 증례

  • Jin-Young Park (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Chang-Mo Jeong (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Mi-Jung Yun (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Jung-Bo Huh (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • So-Hyoun Lee (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Dae-Sung Kim (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
  • 박진영 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 정창모 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 윤미정 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 허중보 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 이소현 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 김대성 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보철학교실)
  • Received : 2023.10.12
  • Accepted : 2023.10.23
  • Published : 2024.07.31

Abstract

In patients with severe alveolar bone resorption on mandibular anterior edentulous areas, it can be difficult to place implants in the location for crowns, and to create the fixed prosthesis having an adequate emergence profile or embrasure, which makes maintenance difficult. Fabricating a removable zirconia prosthesis with a milled bar on poorly positioned implants can be a good option because of easy maintenance. In this case, the patient had severe bone resorption on mandibular anterior region, and large vertical space. We report on the aesthetical and easy-to-maintain results by placing two implants and fabricating a zirconia prosthesis using milled bar.

치조골의 흡수가 심한 하악 전치 부분 무치악 환자의 경우 치아가 위치해야 할 곳에 임플란트를 식립하기 어렵고, 적절한 출현윤곽이나 치간 공극을 가진 고정성 보철물을 만들 수 없어 유지관리가 어려워질 것이다. 적절한 위치에 놓여 있지 못한 임플란트 고정체에 절삭 가공 바(milled bar)를 이용한 지르코니아 보철물로 제작하는 것은 하나의 좋은 치료가 될 수 있고, 이 경우 유지 관리가 용이하도록 탈부착이 가능한 가철성 형태로도 제작할 수 있다. 이번 증례의 환자는 하악 전치부 무치악부에 심한 치조골 흡수를 보였던 환자로, 상악 전치부와의 수직적 공간이 매우 큰 상태였고 이상적인 곳에 임플란트 고정체를 식립할 수 없었다. 식립할 수 있는 곳에 2개의 임플란트를 심고 절삭 바와 어태치먼트를 사용하여 지르코니아 가철성 보철물을 제작하여 심미적으로 만족스럽고 유지 관리가 용이한 결과를 얻었기에 보고하는 바이다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This paper was supported by the grant of clinical research funding of the Dental Hospital of Pusan National University in 2022.

References

  1. Hahn KJ. Treatment plan for missing mandibular 4 incisors. J Korean Acad Esthet Dent 2016;25:25-34. https://doi.org/10.15522/jkaed.2016.25.1.25
  2. Gehrke SA. Importance of crown height ratios in dental implants on the fracture strength of different connection designs: an in vitro study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015;17:790-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12165
  3. Naert I, De Clercq M, Theuniers G, Schepers E. Overdentures supported by osseointegrated fixtures for the edentulous mandible: a 2.5-year report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1988;3:191-6.
  4. Trakas T, Michalakis K, Kang K, Hirayama H. Attachment systems for implant retained overdentures: a literature review. Implant Dent 2006;15:24-34. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.id.0000202419.21665.36
  5. Zitzmann NU, Marinello CP. Treatment plan for restoring the edentulous maxilla with implant-supported restorations: removable overdenture versus fixed partial denture design. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:188-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70155-1
  6. van Kampen F, Cune M, van der Bilt A, Bosman F. Retention and postinsertion maintenance of barclip, ball and magnet attachments in mandibular implant overdenture treatment: an in vivo comparison after 3 months of function. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:720-6. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0905-7161.2003.00961.x
  7. Pasciuta M, Grossmann Y, Finger IM. A prosthetic solution to restoring the edentulous mandible with limited interarch space using an implant-tissue-supported overdenture: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2005;93:116-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.09.024
  8. Chae SK, Cho WT, Choi JW, Bae EB, Bae JH, Bae GH, Huh JB. Comparison of retentive force and wear pattern of Locator® and ADD-TOC attachments combined with CAD-CAM milled bar. J Adv Prosthodont 2022;14:12-21. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2022.14.1.12
  9. Naert I, Gizani S, Vuylsteke M, van Steenberghe D. A 5-year randomized clinical trial on the influence of splinted and unsplinted oral implants in the mandibular overdenture therapy. Part I: Peri-implant outcome. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9:170-7. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1998.090304.x
  10. Walton JN, MacEntee MI, Glick N. One-year prosthetic outcomes with implant overdentures: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:391-8.
  11. Misch CE, Goodacre CJ, Finley JM, Misch CM, Marinbach M, Dabrowsky T, English CE, Kois JC, Cronin RJ Jr. Consensus conference panel report: crown-height space guidelines for implant dentistry-part 2. Implant Dent 2006;15:113-21. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.id.0000217907.18396.18
  12. Cheung MC, Hopcraft MS, Darby IB. Patient-reported oral hygiene and implant outcomes in general dental practice. Aust Dent J 2021;66:49-60. https://doi.org/10.1111/adj.12806
  13. Choi JW, Chae SK, Huh JB. Comparison of the retentive characteristics of two additional attachment used with an implant bar attachment. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2021;59:173-80. https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2021.59.2.173
  14. Yang TC, Maeda Y, Gonda T, Kotecha S. Attachment systems for implant overdenture: influence of implant inclination on retentive and lateral forces. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;22:1315-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02137.x